Foundations for contest success functions

Economic Theory - Tập 43 - Trang 81-98 - 2008
Luis Corchón1, Matthias Dahm2
1Departamento de Economía, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
2Departament d’Economia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus (Tarragona), Spain

Tóm tắt

In the literature, the outcome of contests is either interpreted as win probabilities or as shares of the prize. With this in mind, we examine two approaches to contest success functions (CSFs). In the first, we analyze the implications of contestants’ incomplete information concerning the ‘type’ of the contest administrator. While in the case of two contestants this approach can rationalize prominent CSFs, we show that it runs into difficulties when there are more agents. Our second approach interprets CSFs as sharing rules and establishes a connection to bargaining and claims problems which is independent of the number of contestants. Both approaches provide foundations for popular CSFs and guidelines for the definition of new ones. “The strategic approach also seeks to combine axiomatic cooperative solutions and non-cooperative solutions. Roger Myerson recently named this task the ‘Nash program’.”(Rubinstein 1985, p. 1151)

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alcalde J., Dahm M.: Tullock and Hirshleifer: a meeting of the minds. Rev Econ Des 11, 101–124 (2007) Anbarci N., Skaperdas S., Syropoulos C.: Comparing bargaining solutions in the shadow of conflict: how norms against threats can have real effects. J Econ Theory 106, 1–16 (2002) Baik K.H.: Difference-form contest success functions and effort levels in contests. Eur J Polit Econ 14, 685–701 (1998) Baye M.R., Hoppe H.C.: The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games. Games Econ Behav 44, 217–226 (2003) Bossert W.: An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 25, 205–220 (1993) Che Y.-K., Gale I.: Difference-form contests and the robustness of all-pay auctions. Games Econ Behav 30, 22–43 (2000) Chun Y., Thomson W.: Bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 24, 19–33 (1992) Clark D., Riis C.: Contest success functions: an extension. Econ Theory 11, 201–204 (1998) Corchón L.: The allocative effects of rent-seeking. J Public Econ Theory 2(4), 483–491 (2002) Dagan N., Serrano R., Volij O.: A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games Econ Behav 18, 55–72 (1997) Dagan N., Volij O.: The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach. Math Soc Sci 26, 287–297 (1993) Dixit A.K.: Strategic behavior in contests. Am Econ Rev 77(5), 891–898 (1987) Epstein G.S., Nitzan S.: The politics of randomness. Soc Choice Welf 27, 423–433 (2006) Esteban, J., Sákovics, J.: A theory of agreements in the shadow of conflict (2006, unpublished manuscript) Fullerton R.L., McAfee R.P.: Auctioning entry into tournaments. J Polit Econ 107, 573–605 (1999) Garfinkel, M. R., Skaperdas, S.: Economics of conflict: an overview. In: Sandler, T., Hartley, K. (eds.) Handbook of Defense Economics, vol. 2, Chap. 22, pp. 649–709. Amsterdam: North Holland (2007) Gradstein M.: Optimal contest design: volume and timing of rent seeking in contests. Eur J Polit Econ 14(4), 575–585 (1998) Gradstein M.: Intensity of competition, entry and entry deterrence in rent-seeking contests. Econ Polit 7, 79–91 (1995) Hillman A.L., Riley J.G.: Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Polit 1(1), 17–39 (1989) Hirshleifer J.: Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio vs. difference models of relative success. Public Choice 63, 101–112 (1989) Hirshleifer J., Riley J.: The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992) Hotelling H.: Stability in competition. Econ J 39, 41–57 (1929) Jia H.: A stochastic derivation of contest success functions. Public Choice 135(3–4), 125–130 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9242-1 Konrad, K.A.: Strategy in contests—an introduction, WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2007–01 (2007) Lazear E.P., Rosen S.: Rank-order tournaments and optimum labor contracts. J Polit Econ 89(5), 841–864 (1989) McFadden D..: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P.(eds) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York (1974) Nitzan S.: Modelling rent-seeking contests. Eur J Polit Econ 10, 41–60 (1994) Rubinstein A.: A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences. Econometrica 53(5), 1151–1172 (1985) Salop S.C.: Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J Econ 10, 141–156 (1979) Skaperdas S.: Contest success functions. Econ Theory 7, 283–290 (1996) Szidarovszky F., Okuguchi K.: On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games. Games Econ Behav 18, 135–140 (1997) Tullock, G.: Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G. (eds.) Toward a theory of the rentseeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97–112 (1980) Wärneryd K.: Distributional conflict and jurisdictional organization. J Public Econ 69, 435–450 (1998)