Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review

Fletcher, 2013 Harder, 2014, Some notes on critical appraisal of prevalence studies: comment on: "The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence, Int J Health Pol Manag, 3, 289, 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.99 Wagner, 1998, Medindo a corrêencia da doença: prevalência ou incidência?, J Pediatr (Rio J, 74, 157 Oxman, 2006, Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting, Health Res Pol Syst, 4, 14, 10.1186/1478-4505-4-14 Rotily, 2013, What is the impact of disease prevalence upon health technology assessment?, Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 27, 853, 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.08.018 Borges Migliavaca, 2020, How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study, BMC Med Res Methodol, 20, 96, 10.1186/s12874-020-00975-3 Shamliyan, 2010, A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 1061, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.014 Sterne, 2016, ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions, BMJ, 355, i4919, 10.1136/bmj.i4919 Whiting, 2011, QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, Ann Intern Med, 155, 529, 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 Sterne, 2019, RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, 366, l4898, 10.1136/bmj.l4898 Al-Jader, 2002, Developing a quality scoring system for epidemiological surveys of genetic disorders, Clin Genet, 62, 230, 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2002.620308.x Boyle, 1998, Guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies, Evid Based Ment Health, 1, 37, 10.1136/ebmh.1.2.37 Giannakopoulos, 2012, A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence, Clin Oral Invest, 16, 781, 10.1007/s00784-011-0557-4 Hoy, 2012, Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement, J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 934, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 Loney, 1998, Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem, Chronic Dis Can, 19, 170 Shamliyan, 2011, Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 637, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.006 Silva, 2001, A tool for assessing the usefulness of prevalence studies done for surveillance purposes: the example of hypertension, Rev Panam Salud Publica, 10, 152, 10.1590/S1020-49892001000900002 Munn, 2014, The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence, Int J Health Pol Manag, 3, 123, 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71 Munn, 2015, Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data, Int J Evid Based Healthc, 13, 147, 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054 2016, 106 Avis, 1994, Reading research critically. II. An introduction to appraisal: assessing the evidence, J Clin Nurs, 3, 271, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1994.tb00400.x Downes, 2016, Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS), BMJ Open, 6, 7, 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458 Berra, 2008, [A tool (corrected) for the critical appraisal of epidemiological cross-sectional studies], Gac Sanit, 22, 492, 10.1157/13126932 The University of Manchester. Centre for occupational and environmental health (COEH) - critical appraisal.http://research.bmh.manchester.ac.uk/epidemiology/COEH/undergraduate/specialstudymodules/criticalappraisal/Accessed 1 August 2020 Downs, 1998, The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions, J Epidemiol Community Health, 52, 377, 10.1136/jech.52.6.377 DuRant, 1994, Checklist for the evaluation of research articles, J Adolesc Health, 15, 4, 10.1016/1054-139X(94)90381-6 Fowkes, 1991, Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines, BMJ, 302, 1136, 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1136 Gardner, 1986, Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 292, 810, 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810 Glynn, 2006, A critical appraisal tool for library and information research, Libr Hi Tech, 24, 387, 10.1108/07378830610692154 Kmet, 2004, 2 Law, 1998, 20, 13 Margetts, 2002, Evidence-based nutrition-review of nutritional epidemiological studies, South Afr J Clin Nutr, 15, 68 Slim, 2003, Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument, ANZ J Surg, 73, 712, 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x Hong, 2018 Wells, 2014 2018 2004 Wong, 2008, Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours, Emerging Themes Epidemiol, 5, 23, 10.1186/1742-7622-5-23 Viswanathan, 2012, Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies, J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 163, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.008 Viswanathan, 2013 2018 Sanderson, 2007, Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography, Int J Epidemiol, 36, 666, 10.1093/ije/dym018 Jarde, 2012, Methodological quality assessment tools of non-experimental studies: a systematic review, An Psicol, 28, 617