Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation

Research Policy - Tập 40 - Trang 702-713 - 2011
Kieron Flanagan1, Elvira Uyarra1, Manuel Laranja2
1Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
2Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (ISEG) (School of Economics and Management) Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Portugal

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aghion, 2009, Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: linking policy research and practice in ‘STIG Systems’, Research Policy, 38, 681, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.016 Bache, 2004 Bardach, 2006, Policy dynamics Barrett, 2004, Implementation studies: time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20years of implementation studies, Public Administration, 82, 249, 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x Baumgartner, 1993 Baumgartner, 2002 1989 Bobrow, 2006, Social and cultural factors: constraining and enabling Borrás. S., 2009. “The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance” CIRCLE Working Paper 2009/2, Lund University. Braun, 2006, The mix of policy rationales in science and technology policy, Melbourne Journal of Politics, 31, 8 Braun, 2008, Lessons on the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies, Science and Public Policy, 35, 289, 10.3152/030234208X310347 Branscomb, 1998, Challenges to technology policy Bressers, 2005, Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context Callon, 1986, Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay Caracostas, 2007, The policy-shaper's anxiety at the innovation kick Chaminade, 2006, From theory to practice. The use of the systems of innovation approach to innovation policy Claeys, 2006, Policy mix and debt sustainability: evidence from fiscal policy rules, Empirica, l33, 89, 10.1007/s10663-006-9009-9 David, 1987, Some new standards for the economics of standardization in the information age Dunleavy, 1994, From old public administration to new public management, Public Money & Management, 14, 9, 10.1080/09540969409387823 Edquist, 2000 Elzinga, 1995, Changing policy agendas in science and technology ETAN Expert Working Group, 1998. Climate Change and the Challenge for Research and Technological Development (RTD) Policy–ETAN Working Paper (Directorate General XII Directorate D – Environment and Climate RTD Programme, Directorate AS – RTD Actions: Strategy and Coordination; Directorate General Joint Research Center, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies). Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., 2008. Policy Mix for R&D in the Northwest of England (Policy Mix Project. Available from: http://www.policymix.eu/policymixtool/doc.cfm?pageid=204&docid=200). Galli, 1997, Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems Edler, 2007, Public procurement and innovation—resurrecting the demand side, Research Policy, 36, 949, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003 Gunningham, 1999, Regulatory pluralism: designing policy mixes for environmental protection, Law & Policy, 21, 49, 10.1111/1467-9930.00065 Hay, 1999, Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1, 317, 10.1111/1467-856X.00018 Hay, 2002 Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 Hood, 1983 Hood, 2007, Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the Tools of Government after decades, Governance, 20, 127, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x Howells, 2006, Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy, 35, 715, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 Howlett, 2005, What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes, and policy-implementation styles Howlett, 2003 John, 2003, Is There life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: using evolutionary theory to explain policy change?, Policy Studies Journal, 31, 481, 10.1111/1541-0072.00039 Kay, 2006 Kerr, 2002, Saved from extinction: evolutionary theorising, politics and the state, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4, 330, 10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00008 Kingdon, 1984 Klappholz, 1964, Value judgements and economics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 97, 10.1093/bjps/XV.58.97 Kuhlmann, 2006, How is innovation influenced by science and technology policy governance? Transatlantic comparisons Kuhn, 1962 Landry, 2005, Choice of policy instruments: confronting the deductive and the interactive approaches Laranja, 2008, Policies for science, technology and innovation: translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting, Research Policy, 37, 823, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006 Lascoumes, 2007, Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation, Governance, 20, 1, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x Lindblom, 1958, Tinbergen on policy-making, Journal of Political Economy, 66, 531, 10.1086/258104 Lindblom, 1959, The science of “Muddling Through, Public Administration Review, 19, 79, 10.2307/973677 Linder, 1998, The study of policy instruments: four schools of thought Majone, 1989 March, 2006, The logic of appropriateness Metcalfe, 1994, Evolutionary economics and technology policy, The Economic Journal, 931, 10.2307/2234988 Moreau, 2004, The role of the state in evolutionary microeconomics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 847, 10.1093/cje/beh038 Morlacchi, 2009, Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: a reflexive overview, Research Policy, 38, 571, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.021 Mundell, R., 1962. The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability. IMF Staff Papers, March 1962, pp. 70–77. Nauwelaers, 2008, Conclusions and perspectives: adapting old policy institutions to new challenges Nelson, 1977 Paraskevopoulou E., 2010. “Analyzing the institutional innovation process through an evolutionary lens”, paper presented at the International Schumpeter Society Conference 2010 on Innovation, Organisation, Sustainability and Crises, Aalborg, June 21–24, 2010. Pelikan, 2003, Why economic policies need comprehensive evolutionary analysis Pelikan, 2003 Peters, 2005, The future of instruments research Pollitt, 2008 Rhodes, 2006, Policy network analysis Ringeling, 2005, Instruments in four: the elements of policy design Ruivo, 1994, ‘Phases’ or ‘paradigms’ of science policy?, Science and Public Policy, 21, 157 2002 Scharpf, 1997 Schmitter, 1985, Neo-corporatism and the state Slembeck, 1997, The formation of economic policy: a cognitive-evolutionary approach to policy-making, Constitutional Political Economy, 8, 225, 10.1023/A:1009027913985 Smith, K., 1994. New directions in research and technology policy: identifying the key issues. STEP Report R-01, STEP Group, Oslo, ISSN 0804-8185. Smits, 2004, The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 4, 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621 Soete, L., Corpakis, D., 2003. R&D for competitiveness and employment—the role of benchmarking. IPTS report February 2003, p. 71. Available from: http://www.jrc.es/home/report/english/articles/vol71/welcome.htm. Sorrel, 2003, Carbon trading in the policy mix, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 420, 10.1093/oxrep/19.3.420 Steinmo, 2003, The evolution of policy ideas: tax policy in the 20th century, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5, 206, 10.1111/1467-856X.00104 STRATA/ETAN Expert Group, 2002. Benchmarking national R&D policies: the impact of RTD on competitiveness and employment. Report of an Independent STRATA/ETAN Expert Working Group to the European Commission. Stroick, S., Jenson, J., 1999. What is the Best Policy Mix for Canada's Young Children? Study no. F-09. Canadian Policy Research Network, Ottawa. Tinbergen, 1952 Tinbergen, 1956 UNU/MERIT, Technopolis Group, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Wise Guys Limited, Joanneum Research and ZEW, 2009. Policy Mixes for R&D in Europe, Final Report of the project “Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments” Contract No. DG-RTD-2005-M-01-02. Uyarra, 2010, What is evolutionary about regional systems of innovation?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 115, 10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y Uyarra, 2010, From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 681, 10.1068/c0961 Van den Bergh, 2009 van Lente, 2003, Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 247, 10.1142/S1363919603000817 Van Nispen, 1998, On instruments and instrumentality: a critical assessment Wegner, 2003, Evolutionary markets and the design of institutional policy Wieczorek, A.J., Hekkert, M.P., Smits, R., 2009. Contemporary innovation policy and instruments: challenges and implications. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series No. 09.12. Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht. Wildavsky, 1979 Witt, 2003, Economic policy making in evolutionary perspective, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 77, 10.1007/s00191-003-0148-x