Pyrolysis Temperature Effects on Biochar–Water Interactions and Application for Improved Water Holding Capacity in Vineyard Soils

Soil Systems - Tập 3 Số 2 - Trang 27
Jon A. Marshall1, Richard A. Muhlack2, Benjamin J. Morton1, Lewis Dunnigan1, David J. Chittleborough3,4, Philip Kwong1
1School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
2School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond (Adelaide), SA 5064, Australia
3School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
4Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia

Tóm tắt

Grapevine cane and stalks were considered for pyrolysis at 400 to 700 °C to produce biochar for increasing the water holding capacity of vineyard soil. Feedstocks were pyrolysed using a continuous feed reactor and the resulting biochars characterized in terms of physico-chemical properties, including water retention performance. Hydrophobicity was found in biochar from both feedstocks pyrolysed at 400 °C, but not at higher temperatures. At low soil matric potential, the pyrolysis temperature was the defining variable in determining water retention whereas at higher pressures, the feedstock was the more important variable. Available water content (AWC) of biochar increased with increasing pyrolysis temperatures, with optimal results obtained from grapevine cane at a pyrolysis temperature of 700 °C, which had an AWC 23% higher than a typical clay type soil. Principal component analysis showed variability in water retention of these biochars to be closely associated with the zeta potential, as well as the carbon and ionic content, suggesting that surface charge and hydrophobicity are key properties determining water holding capacity. Pure biochars were superior in water retention performance to typical sandy soils, and so biochar amendment of these soil types may improve water holding (particularly at field capacity). Further study with pot or field trials is recommended to confirm water retention behaviour and assess the feasibility of application under different viticultural scenarios.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Masulili, 2010, Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil 1. The characteristics of rice husk biochar and its influence on the properties of acid sulphate soils and rice growth in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, J. Agric. Sci., 2, 39

Abel, 2013, Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soils, Geoderma, 202, 183, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.003

Basso, 2013, Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils, Gcb Bioenergy, 5, 132, 10.1111/gcbb.12026

Sun, 2014, Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-space properties of clayey soil, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 177, 26, 10.1002/jpln.201200639

2017, Biochar and soil physical properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 81, 687, 10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017

Jeffery, 2015, Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil, Geoderma, 251, 47, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.022

Hardie, 2014, Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability?, Plant Soil, 376, 347, 10.1007/s11104-013-1980-x

Major, 2012, Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna oxisol amended with biochar, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 1076, 10.2134/jeq2011.0128

Kinney, 2012, Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures, Biomass Bioenergy, 41, 34, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.033

Das, 2015, The love-hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: A perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 512, 682, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.061

Dunnigan, 2018, Production of biochar from rice husk: Particulate emissions from the combustion of raw pyrolysis volatiles, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 1639, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.107

Gray, 2014, Water uptake in biochars: The roles of porosity and hydrophobicity, Plant Soil, 61, 196

Muhlack, 2018, Sustainable wineries through waste valorisation: A review of grape marc utilisation for value-added products, Waste Manag., 72, 99, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.011

Kozlowzki, 1983, Water relations of grapevines, Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Volume VII, 137

Coombe, 1992, Irrigation—Principals and Practices, Viticulture Practices, Volume 2, 104

Medrano, 2015, Improving water use efficiency of vineyards in semi-arid regions. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 35, 499, 10.1007/s13593-014-0280-z

Roberts, 2010, Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: Estimating the energetic, economic and climate change potential, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 827, 10.1021/es902266r

Wheal, 2011, A cost-effective acid digestion method using closed polypropylene tubes for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis of plant essential elements, Anal. Methods, 3, 2854, 10.1039/c1ay05430a

Lastoskie, 1993, Pore size distribution analysis of microporous carbons: A density functional theory approach, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 4786, 10.1021/j100120a035

Kameyama, 2012, Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse-derived Biochar Application on Nitrate Leachin in Calcaric Dark Red Soil, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 1131, 10.2134/jeq2010.0453

Cresswell, 2008, The Adequacy of Pressure Plate Apparatus for Determining Soil Water Retention, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 41, 10.2136/sssaj2006.0182

Bittelli, 2009, Errors in Water Retention Curves Determined with Pressure Plates, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 1453, 10.2136/sssaj2008.0082

1980, A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892, 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

Grant, 2010, Application of the Groenevelt-Grant soil water retention model to predict the hydraulic conductivity, Aust. J. Soil Res., 48, 447, 10.1071/SR09198

Dunnigan, 2018, Production of biochar and bioenergy from rice husk: Influence of feedstock drying on particulate matter and the associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions, Atmos. Environ., 190, 218, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.028

Atkinson, 2010, Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review, Plant Soil, 337, 1, 10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5

Yao, 2011, Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: Characterization and phosphate removal potential, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 6273, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006

Jung, 2015, Kinetic study on phosphate removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from peanut shell as renewable adsorptive media, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 3363, 10.1007/s13762-015-0766-5

Cheng, 2008, Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: Changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 72, 1598, 10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010

Pattiya, 2011, Bio-oil production via fast pyrolysis of biomass residues from cassava plants in a fluidised-bed reactor, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 1959, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.117

Kasozi, 2010, Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars), Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 6189, 10.1021/es1014423

Marshall, 2017, Recovery of phosphate from calcium-containing aqueous solution resulting from biochar-induced calcium phosphate precipitation, J. Clean. Prod., 165, 27, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.042

Keiluweit, 2010, Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar), Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1247, 10.1021/es9031419

Chen, 2008, Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5137, 10.1021/es8002684

Raykov, T., and Marcoulides, G.A. (2008). An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Manly, B.F.J. (2005). Multivariate Statisctical Methods: A Primer, Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Karhu, 2011, Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—Results from a short-term pilot field study, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 140, 309, 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005

Novak, 2012, Biochars Impact on Soil-Moisture Storage in an Ultisol and Two Aridisols, Soil Sci., 177, 310, 10.1097/SS.0b013e31824e5593

Blackwell, 2010, Effect of banded biochar on dryland wheat production and fertiliser use in south-western Australia: An agronomic and economic perspective, Aust. J. Soil Res., 48, 531, 10.1071/SR10014

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Soil Systems

Tập 3 Số 2

27

Thông tin tác giả