Investigating the Dynamic Influence of Hydrological Model Parameters on Runoff Simulation Using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting-2-Based Multilevel-Factorial-Analysis Method

MDPI AG - Tập 10 Số 9 - Trang 1177
Shuai Zhou1, Yimin Wang1, Jianxia Chang1, Aijun Guo1, Ziyan Li1
1State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

Tóm tắt

Hydrological model parameters are generally considered to be simplified representations that characterize hydrologic processes. Therefore, their influence on runoff simulations varies with climate and catchment conditions. To investigate the influence, a three-step framework is proposed, i.e., a Latin hypercube sampling (LHS-OAT) method multivariate regression model is used to conduct parametric sensitivity analysis; then, the multilevel-factorial-analysis method is used to quantitatively evaluate the individual and interactive effects of parameters on the hydrologic model output. Finally, analysis of the reasons for dynamic parameter changes is performed. Results suggest that the difference in parameter sensitivity for different periods is significant. The soil bulk density (SOL_BD) is significant at all times, and the parameter Soil Convention Service (SCS) runoff curve number (CN2) is the strongest during the flood period, and the other parameters are weaker in different periods. The interaction effects of CN2 and SOL_BD, as well as effective hydraulic channel conditions (CH_K2) and SOL_BD, are obvious, indicating that soil bulk density can impact the amount of loss generated by surface runoff and river recharge to groundwater. These findings help produce the best parameter inputs and improve the applicability of the model.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Joseph, 2013, Using a parallelized MCMC algorithm in R to identify appropriate likelihood functions for SWAT, Environ. Model. Softw., 46, 292, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.012

Gashaw, 2018, Modeling the hydrological impacts of land use/land cover changes in the Andassa watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia, Sci. Total Environ., 619, 1394, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.191

Her, 2017, Implications of spatial and temporal variations in effects of conservation practices on water management strategies, Water Manag., 180, 252, 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.004

Vilaysane, 2015, Hydrological Stream Flow Modelling for Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Using SWAT Model in the Xedone River Basin, Lao PDR, Procedia Environ. Sci., 28, 380, 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.047

Li, 2010, Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: A case study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in northwest China, J. Hydrol., 385, 76, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.025

Ficklin, 2014, SWAT hydrologic model parameter uncertainty and its implications for hydroclimatic projections in snowmelt-dependent watersheds, J. Hydrol., 519, 2081, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.082

Wu, 2012, Automating calibration, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models using the R package Flexible Modeling Environment (FME): SWAT as an example, Environ. Model. Softw., 317, 99, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.013

Zhang, 2016, Moving SWAT model calibration and uncertainty analysis to an enterprise Hadoop-based cloud, Environ. Model. Softw., 84, 140, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.024

Kouchi, D.H., Esmaili, K., Faridhosseini, A., Sanaeinejad, S.H., Khalili, D., and Abbaspour, K.C. (2017). Sensitivity of Calibrated Parameters and Water Resource Estimates on Different Objective Functions and Optimization Algorithms. Water, 9.

Trudel, M., Doucet-Généreux, P.L., and Leconte, R. (2017). Assessing River Low-Flow Uncertainties Related to Hydrological Model Calibration and Structure under Climate Change Condition. Climate, 5.

Muleta, 2012, Improving Model Performance Using Season-Based Evaluatio, J. Hydrol. Eng., 17, 191, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000421

2014, Investigation of Pb (II) adsorption onto pumice samples: Application of optimization method based on fractional factorial design and response surface methodology, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 16, 819, 10.1007/s10098-013-0673-8

Thiele, 2017, Is there variation across individuals in processing? Bayesian analysis for systems factorial technology, J. Math. Psychol., 81, 40, 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.002

Saleh, 2018, Polyamide magnetic palygorskite for the simultaneous removal of Hg (II) and methyl mercury; with factorial design analysis, J. Environ. Manag., 211, 323, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.050

Tang, 2018, Interaction-based feature selection using Factorial Design, Neurocomputing, 281, 47, 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.058

Meng, 2018, Impacts of recent climate change on the hydrology in the source region of the Yellow River basin, J. Hydrol., 558, 301

Wang, 2018, Quantifying the streamflow response to frozen ground degradation in the source region of the Yellow River within the Budyko framework, J. Hydrol., 558, 301, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.050

Lan, 2010, Response of runoff in the source region of the Yellow River to climate warming, Quat. Int., 226, 60, 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.03.006

Meng, X., and Wang, H. (2017). Significance of the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT Model (CMADS) of East Asia. Water, 9.

Meng, X., Wang, H., Cai, S., Zhang, X., Leng, G., Lei, X., Shi, C., Liu, S., and Shang, Y. (2016). The China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT Model (CMADS) Application in China: A Case Study in Heihe River Basin. Preprints.

Meng, 2017, Investigating spatiotemporal changes of the land-surface processes in Xinjiang using high-resolution CLM3.5 and CLDAS: Soil temperature, Sci. Rep., 7, 13286, 10.1038/s41598-017-10665-8

Zhao, F., Wu, Y., Qiu, L., Sun, Y., Sun, L., Li, Q., Niu, J., and Wang, G. (2018). Parameter Uncertainty Analysis of the SWAT Model in a MountainLoess Transitional Watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Water, 10.

Vu, T.T., Li, L., and Jun, K.S. (2018). Evaluation of MultiSatellite Precipitation Products for Streamflow Simulations: A Case Study for the Han River Basin in the Korean Peninsula, East Asia. Water, 10.

Liu, J., Shanguan, D., Liu, S., and Ding, Y. (2018). Evaluation and Hydrological Simulation of CMADS and CFSR Reanalysis Datasets in the QinghaiTibet Plateau. Water, 10.

Cao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, M., Lei, X., Guo, B., Yang, L., Zeng, Z., and Qu, J. (2018). Application of SWAT Model with CMADS Data to Estimate Hydrological Elements and Parameter Uncertainty Based on SUFI-2 Algorithm in the Lijiang River Basin, China. Water, 10.

Shao, G., Guan, Y., Zhang, D., Yu, B., and Zhu, J. (2018). The Impacts of Climate Variability and Land Use Change on Streamflow in the Hailiutu River Basin. Water, 10.

Meng, 2017, Hydrological modeling in the Manas River Basin using Soil and Water Assessment Tool driven by CMADS, Tehnički Vjesnik, 24, 525

Zhang, 2017, Application of SWAT Model Driven by CMADS in Hunhe River Basin in Liaoning Province. J. N. China. Univ, Water Resour. Electr. Power, 385, 1

Zuo, 2012, Distributed hydrological simulation using swat and sufi-2 in the wei river basin, J. Beijing Norm. Univ., 48, 490

Zhang, 2013, Application of SWAT Model Based SUFI-2Algorithm to Runoff Simulation in Xiushui Basin, Water Resour. Power, 31, 24

Wu, 2015, Evaluating uncertainty estimates in distributed hydrological modeling for the Wenjing River watershed in China by GLUE, SUFI-2, and ParaSol methods, Ecol. Eng., 76, 110, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.014

Abbaspour, 2015, A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model, J. Hydrol., 524, 733, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027

Yang, 2008, Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China, J. Hydrol., 358, 1, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012

Zhou, 2011, Factorial two-stage stochastic programming for water resources management, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 25, 67, 10.1007/s00477-010-0409-9

Martens, 2010, Multi-level binary replacement (MBR) design for computer experiments in high-dimensional nonlinear systems, J. Chemometr., 24, 748, 10.1002/cem.1366

Gitau, 2010, Regionalization of SWAT model parameters for use in ungauged watersheds, Water, 2, 849, 10.3390/w2040849

Che, Q. (2006). Distributed Hydrological Simulation Using SWAT in Yellow River Source Region. [Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou University].

Jia, 2017, Impacts of vegetation on water and heat exchanges in the source region of Yellow River, Plateau Meteorol., 36, 424

Zeng, 2004, The Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Its Spatial Distribution of Alpine Grassland in the Source Region of the Yellow River, Acta Geogr. Sin., 59, 497

Chen, 2016, Vegetation-soil-hydrology interaction and expression of parameter variations in ecohydrological models, J. Beijing Norm. Univ., 52, 362

Yi, 2012, Preliminary Study for the Influences of Grassland Degradation on Soil Water Retention in the Source Region of the Yellow River, J. Nat. Res., 27, 1708

Liu, X.M. (2013). Effect of Soil Sample Initial State on Hydrological Process on Red Soil Slope. [Master’s Thesis, Hunan University].

Hu, H.H. (2011). The Research on the Hydrological Cycle Based on the Synergistic Effect of Vegetation and Frozen Soil in the Source Region of Yangtze and Yellow River. [Ph.D. Thesis, Lanzhou University].