Lapse tables for lapse risk management in insurance: a competing risk approach

European Actuarial Journal - Tập 8 - Trang 97-126 - 2018
Xavier Milhaud1, Christophe Dutang2
1ISFA, Laboratoire SAF, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
2Laboratoire Manceau de Mathématiques, Université du Maine, Le Mans, France

Tóm tắt

This paper deals with the crucial problem of modeling policyholders’ behaviours in life insurance. We focus here on the surrender behaviours and model the contract lifetime through the use of survival regression models. Standard models fail at giving acceptable forecasts for the timing of surrenders because of too much heterogeneity, whereas the competing risk framework provides interesting insights and more accurate predictions. Numerical results follow from using Fine and Gray model (J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):496–509, 1999) on an insurance portfolio embedding Whole Life contracts. Through backtests, this framework reveals to be quite efficient and recovers the empirical lapse rate trajectory by aggregating individual predicted lifetimes. These results could be particularly useful to design future insurance product. Moreover, this setting allows to calibrate experimental lapse tables, simplifying the lapse risk management for operational teams.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arenare SA (2016) 2016 insurance industry risk factor review. Technical report, Willkie Farr and Gallagher LLP Augustyniak M, Boudreault M (2015) On the importance of hedging dynamic lapses in variables annuities. Risk Reward Soc Actuar 66:12–16 Bacinello AR (2005) Endogenous model of surrender conditions in equity-linked life insurance. Insur Math Econ 37:270–296 Bacinello AR, Biffis E, Millossovich P (2008) Pricing life insurance contracts with early exercise features. J Comput Appl Math 233(1):27–35 Beyersmann J, Allignol A, Schumacher M (2012) Competing risks and multistate models with R. Use R!. Springer, Berlin Browne MW (2000) Cross-validation methods. J Math Psychol 44(1):108–132 Buchardt K (2014) Dependent interest and transition rates in life insurance. Insur Math Econ 55:167–179 Buchardt K, Moller T, Schmidt KB (2015) Cash flows and policyholder behaviour in the semi-Markov life insurance setup. Scand Actuar J 660–688:2015 Conwill S (2016) Life insurance risks: observations on solvency II and the modeling of capital needs. Technical report, Milliman, White Paper Cox SH, Lin Y (2006) Annuity lapse rate modeling: tobit or not tobit? Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg Dickinson Gibbons J, Chakraborti S (2003) Nonparametric statistical inference. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York Eling M, Kochanski M (2013) Research on lapse in life insurance: what has been done and what needs to be done? J Risk Insur 14(4):392–413 Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):496–509 Fleming TR, Harrington DP (2013) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York Gray B (2014) cmprsk: Subdistribution analysis of competing risks. R package version 2.2-7 Gray RJ (1988) A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 16:1141–1154 Kim C (2005) Modeling surrender and lapse rates with economic variables. N Am Actuar J 9(4):56–70 Kuo W, Tsai C, Chen WK (2003) An empirical study on the lapse rate: the cointegration approach. J Risk Insur 70:489–508 Laurent JP, Norberg R, Planchet F (2016) Modelling in life insurance—a management perspective. EAA series. Springer, Berlin Martinussen T, Scheike TH (2006) Dynamic regression models for survival data. Springer, Berlin Milhaud X (2013) Exogenous and endogenous risk factors management to predict surrender behaviours. ASTIN Bull 43(3):373–398 Outreville JF (1990) Whole-life insurance lapse rates and the emergency fund hypothesis. Insur Math Econ 9:249–255 Pepe MS (1991) Inference for events with dependent risks in multiple endpoint studies. J Am Stat Assoc 86:770–778 R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Russell DT, Fier SG, Carson JM, Dumm RE (2013) An empirical analysis of life insurance policy surrender activity. J Insur Issues 36(1):35–37 Scheike TH, Zhang M-J (2011) Analyzing competing risk data using the r timereg package. J Stat Softw 38:1–15 Sharara I, Hardy M, Saunders D (2010) A comparative analysis of U.S., Canadian and Solvency II capital adequacy requirements in life insurance. Technical report, Society of Actuaries Sun P, Mo X (2011) Variable annuity dynamic lapse study: a data mining approach. Technical report, Milliman