How children experience creative writing in the classroom
Tóm tắt
The structure of a child’s writing experience stems from the affect, embodiment, and materiality of their immediate engagement with activities in the classroom. When a child’s movements and emotions are restricted, so too is their writing. This engagement shapes the experiential landscape of classroom writing, and the way that children perceive, value and feel about writing, affects their motivation which predicts their writing attainment. This paper reveals the structure of children’s consciousness while expressing ideas through creative writing. It does so by presenting an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the writing experience in the classroom. In the study, eight Year 6 (11–12 years old) children from a school in Perth, Australia were interviewed, and qualitative data were analysed to interpret the essential components of the writing experience. The results produced three main themes (sub-themes noted in brackets): The Writing World (Watching, Ideas from Elsewhere, Flowing); The Self (Concealing & Revealing, Agency, Adequacy); and Schooled Writing (Standards, Satisfying Task Requirements, Rules of Good Writing). The themes indicate a binary experience of writing where the child’s consciousness shifts between their imagination (The Writing World) and the task before them (Schooled Writing), and each affects the way the experience of the self appears to the writer. When comparing the experience with that of authors, one notices that the experience of words as authorial tools is missing. The results imply that the writing environment, and the individual’s response to it, may restrict the engagement and the phenomenality of writing.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bevan, M. (2014). A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 136–144.
Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Boldt, G., Lewis, C., & Leander, K. (2015). Moving, feeling, desiring, teaching. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(4), 430–441.
Brilliant, J. (2005). Writing as an act of courage: The inner experience of developmental writers. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(7), 505–516.
Brown, B. (2001). Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, 28(1), 1–22.
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (in press). Literacy-as-event: Accounting for relationality in literacy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education.
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2018). Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69.
Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Pahl, K., & Roswell, J. (2014). The (im)materiality of literacy: the significance of subjectivity to new literacies research. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 90–103.
Collins, S. (2003). Compelled to connect: A phenomenological study of the experience of writing. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Cremin, T., & Myhill, D. (2012). Writing voices: Creating communities of writers. Oxford: Routledge.
Dickson, A., Allan, D., & O’Carroll, R. E. (2008). Biographical disruption and the experience of loss following a spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Health, 23(4), 407–425.
Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2014). Embodied Composition in real virtualities: Adolescents’ literacy practices and felt experiences moving with digital, mobile devices in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 428–452.
Enriquez, G. (2014). Embodiments of ‘struggle’: The melancholy, loss, and interactions with print of two ‘struggling readers’. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 45(1), 105–122.
Fine, E. (2015). The drive to write: Inside the writing lives of five fiction authors. Antioch University, New Hampshire.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Gardner, P. (2013). Writing in context: Reluctant writers and their writing at home and at school. English in Australia, 46(1), 71–81.
Gardner, P. (2014). Who am I? Compositions of the self: An autoethnographic, rhizotextual analysis of two poetic texts. English in Education, 48(3), 230–249.
Gardner, P. (2018). Writing and writer identity: the poor relation and the search for voice in ‘personal literacy’. Literacy, 52(1), 11–19.
Gillespie, A., Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2013). Fifth-grade students’ knowledge about writing process and writing genres. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 565–588.
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Goodman, G. (2008). Coming to critical constructivism: Roots and branches. In G. Goodman (Ed.), Educational psychology: An application of critical constructivism (pp. 33–52). New York: Peter Lang.
Grainger, T., Goouch, K., & Lambirth, A. (2005). Creativity and writing: Developing voice and verve in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Harrell, J. (2006). The adult creative writer: A phenomenological study. University of Idaho, Idaho.
Healey, B. (2018). How children experience writing: An interpretative phenomenological analysis, Master’s thesis, Murdoch University, Perth Australia.
Healey, B. & Merga, M. (2017). A phenomenological perspective of children’s writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 40(3), 199–209.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Bremen and Freiburg Lectures: Insights into that which is and basic principles of thinking (A. J. Mitchell, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kellogg, R. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2012). Rereading ‘A pedagogy of multiliteracies’: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merchant, G. (2017). Hands, fingers and iPad. In C. Burnett, G. Merchant, A. Simpson, & M. Walsh (Eds.), The Case of the iPad: Mobile literacies in education. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2012). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 18(2), 316–369.
Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide to researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage Publications.
Thrift, N. (2010). Understanding the material practices of glamour. In M. Gregg & G.J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 289–308). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Turpin, G., Barley, V., Beail, N., Scaife, J., Slade, P., Smith, J.A., & Walsh, S. (1997). Standards for research projects and theses involving qualitative methods: Suggested guidelines for trainees and courses. Clinical Psychology Forum, 108, 3–7.
van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. California: Left Coast Press.
van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. California: Left Coast Press.
van Manen, M., & Adams, C. (2009). The phenomenology of space in writing online. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41 (1), 10–21.
Wilson, H. (2009). A phenomenological study of writers and the epistemological and ontological implications of teaching writing. Walden University, Minneapolis.
Zumbrunn, S., Ekholm, E., Stringer, J.K., McKnight, K., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2017). Student experiences with writing: Taking the temperature of the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 70 (5), 1–11.