Demand articulation in the open-innovation paradigm
Tóm tắt
In the marketing literatures, “articulation of demand” is quoted as an important competency of market-driving firms. In this paper, therefore, I will demonstrate how the concept of “demand articulation” was effective in formulating corporate policies for technology and market development, and also in government policies for accelerating the commercialization process of emerging technologies. In order to comprehend empirically what really means “demand articulation”, i.e., how “market-driving” is different from “market-driven,” we conducted a quantitative analysis of market growth paths in three different kinds of product categories. We came to the arguments of “business model” creation, which will bring the concept of “demand articulation” into a reality under an emerging business environment of open innovation. In order for the concept of “open innovation” to be effective, the accumulation and advanced utilization of big-data is an absolute necessity. In other words, the combination of business model creation, accompanied by the accumulation of big data and its advanced utilization, can make the arguments of market-driving more plausible, and make the accuracy of demand articulation more enhanced. As far as business model itself is concerned, the experimentation and simulation of alternative business models becomes possible with the sheer existence of big-data. These are necessary conditions for IoT (Internet of Things) to be brought into a reality.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbate J. Inventing the Internet. The MIT Press; 1999.
Alice J. and Branscomb L. Beyond Spinoff. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1992. p. 19.
Anderson P, Tushman L. Managing through Cycles of Technological Changes, Research Technology Management.1991.
Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press. 2003.
Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom R. The dual-edged role of the business model in leveraging corporate technology investments. In: Branscomb L, Auerswald P, editors. Taking Technical Risks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. p. 57–68.
Christensen C, Rosenbloom R. “Explaining the attacker’s advantage: technological patterns, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy. 1995;24:233–57.
Cupertino Silicon Valley Press. Steve Jobs: His Own Words and Wisdom, Cupertino Silicon Valley Press. 2011.
Foster R. Innovation: the Attacker’s Advantage. New York: Summit Books; 1986.
Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Pinter Publishers. 1987.
Gaddis J. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press. 2005.
Gomory R. “From the ‘Ladder of Science’ to the Product Development Cycle,” Harvard Business Review 67, no. 6: 99–105; Gomory and Schmitt, “Science and Product,”. 1989. p. 1131.
Gomory R, Schmitt R. Science and product. Science. 1988;240:1131.
Hamel G, Prahalad C. Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing, Harvard Business Review. 1991. p. 81–92.
Kline S, Rosenberg N. An Overview of Innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N, editors. The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington D.C: National Academy Press; 1986. p. 275–305.
Kodama F. Technology Fusion and the New R&D, Harvard Business Review. 1992.
Kodama F. Analyzing the Innovation Process for Policy \Formulation: Research Agenda drawn from the Japanese Experiences, Chapter 12, OECD Tokyo Workshop on Social Sciences and Innovation. 2000. p. 117–23.
Kodama F. Measuring emerging categories of innovation: modularity and business model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2004;71:623–33.
Kodama F. Emerging Patterns of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press. 1995.
Lundvall B., Jurowetzki R., Lema R. “Combining the Global Value Chain and the Innovation System perspectives,” Paper prepared for the 11th Asialics International Conference 2014, Daegu, Korea. 2014.
Mason K, Leek S. Learning to build a supply network: an exploration of dynamic business models. Journal of Management Studies. 2008;45(4):774–99.
National Research Council. International Competition in Advanced Technology: Decision for America. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1983.
National Research Council. New Strategies for New Challenges: Corporate Innovation in the United States and Japan, Committee on Japan Office of Japan Affairs, Office of international Affairs. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1999.
Nelson R, editor. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
Nelson R, Winter S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press; 1982. p. 256.
Newsweek, Convergence: Embracing a Millennium of Change, Special Advertising Section of Newsweek June 21, 1999.
Numagami T. History of Liquid Crystal Display Technology (in Japanese), Hakuto Shyboh. 1999.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Case Study of Electronics with Particular Reference to the Semiconductor Industry. Paris: joint working paper of the Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy and the Industry Committee on Technology and the Structural Adaptation of Industry; 1977. p. 133–63.
Osaki M, Gemba K, Kodama F. “Market growth models in which the potential market size increases with time,” PICMET (Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology). 2001. p. 788–96.
Oshima K, Kodama F. Japanese Experiences in Collective Industrial Activity: An Analysis of Engineering Research Associations. In: Fusfeld H, Nelson R, editors. Technical Cooperation and International Competitiveness. New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 1988. p. 93–103.
Randazzese L. “Semiconductor Subsidies,” Scientific American. 1996. p. 46–9.
Ritala P, Sainio L. Coopetition for radical innovation: technology, market and business-model perspectives. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2014;26:2.
Rosenberg N. Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1976. p. 108–25.
Rosenberg, N. (1994): “Uncertainty and Technological Change,” paper presented at Growth and Development: The Economics of the 21st Century. Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, June 3–4, 1994.
Sakane M. Limitless Challenge of Managing No.1 Company (in Japanese Kagirinai Dantosu-keiei-eno Chousen), Nikka-Giren Publishing. 2006 p. 46.
Sharif M, Ramanathan K. Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1981;20:63–87.
Sheth J, Sisodia R. Revisiting marketing’s lawlike generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1999;27(1):71–87.
Sigurdson J. Industry and State Partnership in Japan: The Very Large Scale Integrated Circuits Project, Research Policy Institute, discussion paper no. 168. Sweden: University of Lund; 1986. p. 86–93.
Tongur S, Engwall M. The business model dilemma of technology shifts. Technovation. 2014;34:9.
Yoshida S. My autobiography, Nikkei Shimbun (Japan Economic Newspaper), June 2007. 2007.