Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting Enhances Survival in Diabetic Patients

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) - Tập 126 Số 25 - Trang 2935-2942 - 2012
Malcolm J. Dorman1, Paul Kurlansky1, Ernest A. Traad1, David L. Galbut1, Melinda Zucker1, George Ebra1
1From the Florida Medical Center, Tenet Healthcare Corp, Fort Lauderdale (M.J.D.), and Florida Heart Research Institute, Miami (M.J.D., P.A.K., E.A.T., D.L.G., M.Z., G.E.).

Tóm tắt

Background— The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an unprecedented rate, affecting nearly 8% of the population. Previous studies have demonstrated a potential benefit for surgical over interventional revascularization in this group of patients. Similarly, studies have shown the superiority of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting in select populations. However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA grafting in diabetics. Therefore, we studied the long-term results of BIMA versus SIMA grafting in a large population of diabetic patients in whom BIMA grafting was broadly applied. Methods and Results— Between February 1972 and May 1994, 1107 consecutive diabetic patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with either SIMA (n=646) or BIMA (n=461) grafting. Optimal matching with the propensity score was used to create matched SIMA (n=414) and BIMA (n=414) cohorts. Cross-sectional follow-up (6 weeks to 30.1 years; mean, 8.9 years) determined long-term survival. There was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between matched SIMA and BIMA groups (operative mortality, 10 of 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P =0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P =0.179); total complications, 71 of 414 [17.1%] versus 71 of 414 [17.1%]; P =1.000). Late survival was significantly enhanced with the use of BIMA grafting (median survival: SIMA, 9.8 years versus BIMA, 13.1 years; P =0.001). Use of BIMA was found to be associated with late survival on Cox regression ( P =0.003). Conclusion— Compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA grafting in propensity score–matched patients provides diabetics with enhanced survival without any increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes public health resource. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm. Accessed February 29 2012.

Boyle JP Thompson TJ Gregg EW Barker LE Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence mortality and prediabetes prevalence. Pop Health Metrics. 2010;8:29. http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/8/1/29. Accessed February 29 2012.

American Heart Association. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/Diabetes/WhyDiabetesMatters/Cardiovascular-Disease-Diabetes_UCM_313865_Article.jsp#.T07niXn16KI. Accessed February 29 2012.

10.1161/circulationaha.106.658948

10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.050

10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02065-X

10.1161/circ.96.6.1761

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3

10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X

10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00470-0

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.006

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.094

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.055

10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078

10.1080/01621459.1989.10478868

10.1161/circulationaha.108.832444

10.1161/01.cir.0000085995.87982.6e

10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.10.048

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.077

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.082

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.061

10.1186/1749-8090-3-35

10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70188-1

10.1161/circulationaha.106.615427

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.004

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.059

10.1510/icvts.2007.164343

10.1097/00001573-200211000-00003

Goyal V, Pinto RJ, Mukherjee K, Travedi A, Sharma S, Bhattacharya S. Alteration in pulmonary mechanics after coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison using internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts. Indian Heart J. 1994;46:345–348.

Gideon S, Meir A, Battler A, Shapira Y, Vidne BA, Ben-Dor I. Bilateral skeletonized internal mammary versus single-pedicled internal mammary grafting in the elderly. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9:294–298.

10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00695-9

10.1056/NEJM198808253190802

10.1016/0003-4975(92)90073-D

10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00029-1

10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70011-X

10.1186/1745-6215-7-7

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.053

10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.031

10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.028

10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03040-5

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Tập 126 Số 25

2935-2942

Thông tin tác giả