On tests and indices for evaluating structural models

Personality and Individual Differences - Tập 42 - Trang 825-829 - 2007
Peter M. Bentler1
1University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Psychology and Statistics, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bentler, 1990, Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Bentler, 1995 Bentler, P. M. (in press). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. Bentler, 1980, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Browne, 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit, 136 Browne, 2002, When fit indices and residuals are incompatible, Psychological Methods, 7, 403, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403 Curran, 1996, The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 1, 16, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 de Leeuw, 1988, Model selection in multinomial experiments, 118 Hu, 1995, Evaluating model fit, 76 Hu, 1992, Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 Jöreskog, 1982, Recent developments in structural equation modeling, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404, 10.2307/3151714 Lee, 1995, A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1995.tb01067.x MacCallum, 2003, Working with imperfect models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 113, 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_5 MacCallum, 1992, Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 Maydeu-Olivares, 2006, A cautionary note on using G2(dif) to assess relative model fit in categorical data analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 55, 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_4 McDonald, 2002, Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses, Psychological Methods, 7, 64, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64 Schilling, 2005, High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature, Psychometrika, 70, 1 Stout, 1990, A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation, Psychometrika, 55, 293, 10.1007/BF02295289 Yuan, 2004, On chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737, 10.1177/0013164404264853 Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (in press-a). Structural equation modeling. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (in press-b). Robust procedures in structural equation modeling. In S.-Y. Lee (Ed.). Handbook of structural equation models. Amsterdam: Elsevier.