Sensitivity study of meteorological parameters on mineral aerosol mobilization, transport, and distribution

American Geophysical Union (AGU) - Tập 108 Số D15 - 2003
Chao Luo1, N. M. Mahowald1, John del Corral1
1Institute for Computational Earth Systems Science University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California USA

Tóm tắt

Predicting mineral aerosol distributions is a difficult task due to the episodic nature of the sources and transport. Here we show comparisons between a 22‐year simulation of mineral aerosols and satellite and in situ observations. Our results suggest that the model does a good job of predicting atmospheric mineral aerosol distributions, with some discrepancies. In addition, there are differences between our model results and previously published results [e.g., Ginoux et al., 2001]. We conduct several tests of the sensitivity of mineral aerosol simulations to the meteorological data sets and mobilization parameterizations in order to understand the differences. Comparisons between model simulations using National Center for Atmospheric Research/National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP/NCAR) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Data Assimilation Office (NASA DAO) reanalysis data sets show that the model results with the two data sets are fairly consistent but with some important differences. The sensitivity analysis shows that differences between simulated dust near Australia are likely due to differences in both source parameterization and surface winds. Differences over East Asia are dominated by differences in meteorology. The sensitivity analysis also shows that we cannot tell from comparisons with observations whether the cultivation source is active nor eliminate it because of the large uncertainty in meteorology and source parameterization.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1029/1999RG000066

10.1029/JD095iD13p22389

10.1029/97JD00796

10.1029/93JD02456

P. Y. Belly 1964

Bonan G. B. A land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological hydrological and atmospheric studies: Technical description and user's guide Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN‐417+STR Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res. Boulder Colo. 1996.

10.1029/2002GL016446

10.1029/2000JD900525

10.1038/17276

10.1029/2000JD900384

10.1029/2001GL013205

10.1029/96JD01818

10.1126/science.278.5339.827

10.1007/s00585-999-0149-7

10.1029/JD093iD11p14233

10.1029/97JD00960

10.1029/2000JD000053

10.1029/1999JD901084

10.1029/96GB02344

10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5

10.1029/96JD04009

10.1111/j.1365-3091.1982.tb01713.x

10.1029/96JD02955

Jickells T. D., 2001, Biogeochemistry of Iron in Seawater

S. Kriedenweis G. Tyndall M. Barth F. Dentener J. Lelieveld M. Mozurkewich G. Brasseur J. Orlando G. Tyndal 1999 Oxford Univ. Press New York

10.1029/97JD02084

10.1029/1999JD900084

10.1029/2002JD002097

10.1029/95JD00690

10.1029/PA005i001p00001

10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<0474:GVALUN>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2403:RFOATD>2.0.CO;2

10.1029/JC086iC04p03236

10.1007/978-94-009-0503-0_4

10.1038/320735a0

10.1007/BF02179824

10.1029/2000RG000095

10.1029/97JD02087

10.1029/2001GL013204

10.1126/science.287.5456.1227

M. Schulz Y. Balkanski W. Guelle C. Moulin C. E. Lambert 1996 Kluwer Acad. Norwell Mass.

J. Seinfeld S. Pandis 1996 John Wiley Hoboken N. J.

10.1038/381681a0

10.1029/94JD01928

10.1029/95JD02051

10.1029/98JD02345

10.1029/97JD01864

10.1029/2001JD000963

10.1007/s003820050219

10.1038/35037561

10.1029/JB084iB09p04643

10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0840:AOGMPU>2.0.CO;2

10.1029/2002JD002775