Rethinking Justices' and Committees' Strategies in Segal's Separation of Powers Game

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 106 - Trang 131-135 - 2001
Tim Groseclose1, Sara Schiavoni2
1Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, U.S.A
2Department of Political Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, U.S.A

Tài liệu tham khảo

Groseclose, T., Levitt, S. and Snyder, J. (1999). Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers. American Political Science Review 93: 33-50. McCarty, N. and Poole, K. (1995). Veto power and legislation: An empirical analysis of executive-legislative bargaining from 1961–1986. Journal of Law, Economics, andOrganization 11: 282-312. Schiavoni, S. (1998). Constraints on the Court, congressional preferences, and the spinal tap fallacy. Manuscript. Ohio State University. Segal, J.A. (1997). Separation-of-powers games in the positive theory of Congress and Courts. American Political Science Review 91: 28-44. Segal, J.A. (1998). Correction to 'separation-of-powers games in the positive theory of Congress and Courts'. American Political Science Review 92: 923-926.