Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: A qualitative study

Laura Anne Jacox1, Paul Mihas2, Christina Cho3, Feng-Chang Lin4, Ching-Chang Ko1
1Orthodontics Department, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC
2Howard W. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
3Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass.
4Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bauer, 2001, The digital transformation of oral health care. Teledentistry and electronic commerce, J Am Dent Assoc, 132, 204, 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0156 van der Zande, 2013, Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies, Br Dent J, 215, E21, 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1146 Alford, 2011, Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the Suresmile method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy, Angle Orthod, 81, 383, 10.2319/071810-413.1 Brown, 2015, Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148, 1067, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.029 Fox, 2005, Longer orthodontic treatment may result in greater external apical root resorption, Evid Based Dent, 6, 21, 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400304 Khalaf, 2014, Factors affecting the formation, severity and location of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, J Oral Maxillofac Res, 5, e4, 10.5037/jomr.2014.5104 Sachdeva, 2012, Treatment time: Suresmile vs conventional, Orthodontics (Chic), 13, 72 Sameshima, 2001, Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part II. Treatment factors, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, 511, 10.1067/mod.2001.113410 Saxe, 2010, Efficiency and effectiveness of Suresmile, World J Orthod, 11, 16 Segal, 2004, Meta analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption, Orthod Craniofac Res, 7, 71, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00286.x Tufekci, 2011, Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, Angle Orthod, 81, 206, 10.2319/051710-262.1 Weber, 2013, Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of customized vs conventional preadjusted bracket systems, J Clin Orthod, 47, 261 Uribe, 2014, Patients', parents', and orthodontists' perceptions of the need for and costs of additional procedures to reduce treatment time, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, S65, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.015 Clark, 2007, Increasing practice efficiency and profitability using In-Ovation Self-ligating Brackets, Dentsply GAC, 1 Phipps, 2004, Seven keys to on-time finishing, J Clin Orthod, 38, 155 Matthews, 2016, Factors influencing adoption of new technologies into dental practice, JDR Clin Transl Res, 1, 77, 10.1177/2380084415627129 Rubin, 2012 Carter, 2014, The use of triangulation in qualitative research, Oncol Nurs Forum, 41, 545, 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 Mackay, 2017, Acquisition of a digital intraoral scanning device: an examination of practice volume changes and the economic impact via an interrupted time series analysis, J Clin Dent, 1 Noble, 2009, Future practice plans of orthodontic residents in the United States, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, 357, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.024 Park, 2016, Trends in the use of digital study models and other technologies among practicing orthodontists, J Clin Orthod, 50, 413 Saldaña, 2016 Silver, 2014 Anand, 2015, Retrospective investigation of the effects and efficiency of self-ligating and conventional brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148, 67, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.029 Penning, 2017, Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a randomized controlled clinical trial, J Dent Res, 96, 1498, 10.1177/0022034517720913 Kattner, 1993, Comparison of Roth appliance and standard edgewise appliance treatment results, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 103, 24, 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70100-3 Proffit, 2014 Wismeijer, 2014, Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (intraoral scan) of dental implants, Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, 1113, 10.1111/clr.12234 Yuzbasioglu, 2014, Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes, BMC Oral Health, 14, 10, 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10 Baumgaertel, 2009, Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, 19, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016 Berco, 2009, Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, 17.e1, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.021 Costalos, 2005, Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, 624, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.017 Fleming, 2011, Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review, Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, 1, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x Hilgers, 2005, Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, 803, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034 Kau, 2005, Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics, J Orthod, 32, 282, 10.1179/146531205225021285 Quimby, 2004, The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models, Angle Orthod, 74, 298 Zilberman, 2003, Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models, Angle Orthod, 73, 301