SME Engagement with Open Innovation: Commitments and Challenges towards Collaborative Innovation

Dahlander, 2021, How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward, Res. Policy, 50, 104218, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104218 Chaudhary, 2022, Way off the mark? Open innovation failures: Decoding what really matters to chart the future course of action, J. Bus. Res., 142, 1010, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.062 Nguyen, 2021, A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Open Innovation on Performance, J. Manag. Organ., 1 Bigliardi, 2020, The influence of open innovation on firm performance, Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., 12, 10.1177/1847979020969545 Corral de Zubielqui, 2019, Social media, Open Innovation & HRM: Implications for performance, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 144, 334, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.014 Stefan, 2022, The dark side of open innovation: Individual affective responses as hidden tolls of the paradox of openness, J. Bus. Res., 38, 360, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.028 Grimaldi, 2021, A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation, J. Bus. Res., 123, 156, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.043 Bigliardi, 2021, The past, present and future of open innovation, Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 24, 1130, 10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296 Adam, 2021, Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: The role of external support, J. Innov. Entrep., 10, 1, 10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6 Hameed, 2018, Determinants of firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R&D department: An empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s, J. Glob. Entrep. Res., 8, 29, 10.1186/s40497-018-0112-8 Matt, 2020, SME 4.0: The Role of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in the Digital Transformation, 3 Lim, 2020, The impact of the global crisis on the growth of SMEs: A resource system perspective, Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep., 36, 492, 10.1177/0266242620950159 Almeida, 2021, Open-Innovation Practices: Diversity in Portuguese SMEs, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7 Cheng, 2021, Establishing a typology of open innovation strategies and their differential impacts on innovation success in an Asia-Pacific developed economy, Asia Pac. J. Manag., 38, 65, 10.1007/s10490-019-09656-2 Teh, 2020, Enablers of Innovation Performance among Malaysian SMEs in Industrial Revolution 4.0, Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., 4, 14 Ovuakporie, 2021, Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance, Res. Policy, 50, 104146, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104146 Abhari, 2022, Limiting factors of open innovation organizations: A case of social product development and research agenda, Technovation, 102526 Bertello, 2022, Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: An analysis of pre-competitive projects in university-industry-government collaboration, Int. Entrep. Manag. J., 18, 89, 10.1007/s11365-020-00727-1 Chesbrough, 2003 Brunswicker, 2018, The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms Practices, Measures, and Risks: A survey of large firms examines how firms approach open innovation strategically and manage knowledge flows at the project level, Res.-Technol. Manag., 61, 35 Maradana, 2017, Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries, J. Innov. Entrep., 6, 1, 10.1186/s13731-016-0061-9 Chang, 2022, Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior of New Employees: Effects of Mentoring Functions and Supervisor Need for Achievement, SAGE Open, 12, 10.1177/21582440211068515 Jafarpanah, 2020, Association between organizational citizenship behavior and patient safety culture from nurses’ perspectives: A descriptive correlational study, BMC Nurs., 19, 10.1186/s12912-020-00416-y Urbini, 2020, Promoting Individual and Organizational OCBs: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement, Behav. Sci., 10, 10.3390/bs10090138 Ficapal-Cusí, 2020, Linking perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and knowledge sharing with prosocial organizational behavior of altruism and civic virtue, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su122410289 Smith, 1983, Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents, J. Appl. Psychol., 68, 653, 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653 Organ, 1989, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 294, 10.2307/258426 Vance, 2006, Employee Engagement and Commitment, SHRM Found., 1, 1 Naz, 2020, A Study in the Relationship between Supportive Work Environment and Employee Retention: Role of Organizational Commitment and Person–Organization Fit as Mediators, SAGE Open, 10, 10.1177/2158244020924694 Engelsberger, 2021, Multicultural skills in open innovation: Relational leadership enabling knowledge sourcing and sharing, Pers. Rev., 51, 980, 10.1108/PR-10-2019-0539 Badir, 2020, Employee-level open innovation in emerging markets: Linking internal, external, and managerial resources, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 48, 891, 10.1007/s11747-019-00674-6 Caprar, 2022, Beyond “Doing as the Romans Do”: A review of research on countercultural business practices, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 10.1057/s41267-021-00479-2 Narula, 2019, Applying and advancing internalization theory: The multinational enterprise in the twenty-first century, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 50, 1231, 10.1057/s41267-019-00260-6 Hristov, 2022, The cultural dimension as a key value driver of the sustainable development at a strategic level: An integrated five-dimensional approach, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 10.1007/s10668-022-02345-z Wiener, 2019, Cultural prerequisites for participating in open foresight, R D Manag., 49, 703, 10.1111/radm.12363 Kratzer, 2017, Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 119, 128, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.022 Yun, 2020, The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su12125076 Wiener, 2018, Open foresight: The influence of organizational context, Creat. Innov. Manag., 27, 56, 10.1111/caim.12238 Morrison-Smith, 2020, Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review, SN Appl. Sci., 2, 1096, 10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 D. Deichmann I. Rozentale R. Barnhoorn Open Innovation Generates Great Ideas, So Why Aren’t Companies Adopting Them? Available online: https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:pure.eur.nl:publications%2F2a3958f9-f5d7-4e28-9e2d-47a508878898 (accessed on 1 June 2022) Kim, 2018, The role of problem-solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 4, 4, 10.3390/joitmc4020004 McPhillips, 2020, Trouble in Paradise? Barriers to Open Innovation in Regional Clusters in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6 Naqshbandi, 2015, What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation?, Qual. Quant., 49, 2123, 10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5 Jeong, 2019, Exploring Relationships among Organizational Culture, Empowerment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the South Korean Professional Sport Industry, Sustainability, 11, 10.3390/su11195412 Tsui, 2006, Organizational culture in China: An analysis of culture dimensions and culture types, Manag. Organ. Rev., 2, 345, 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00050.x Stoian, 2017, SME Networks and International Performance: Unveiling the Significance of Foreign Market Entry Mode, J. Small Bus. Manag., 55, 128, 10.1111/jsbm.12241 Naqshbandi, 2022, The linkage between open innovation, absorptive capacity and managerial ties: A cross-country perspective, J. Innov. Knowl., 7, 100167, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100167 Villa, 2017, From SMEs networks towards collaborative management, Procedia Manuf., 13, 1297, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.060 Yoon, 2021, How Can Personnel Performance Evaluation Systems Be Improved?, SAGE Open, 11, 10.1177/2158244020986538 Basic, 2022, How Does Open Businss Model Transform Elements of Innovation Culture into Open Innovation Practices of High and Low Internationalisation Firms?, J. Knowl. Econ. Naqshbandi, 2011, A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours, Organizational Structures and Open Innovation, Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., 2, 182 Sancho-Zamora, 2022, The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 10.3390/ijerph19020842 Greco, 2015, Open innovation actions and innovation performance: A literature review of European empirical evidence, Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 18, 150, 10.1108/EJIM-07-2013-0074 Hossain, 2015, A review of literature on open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, J. Glob. Entrep., 5, 6, 10.1186/s40497-015-0022-y Li, 2022, The more we get together, the more we can save? A transaction cost perspective, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 62, 102434, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102434 Brown, 2021, A process model for collaboration in circular oriented innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 125499, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125499 Obradović, 2021, Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda, Technovation, 102, 102221, 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221 He, 2020, Strategic Alliance Research in the Era of Digital Transformation: Perspectives on Future Research, Br. J. Manag., 31, 589, 10.1111/1467-8551.12406 Huang, 2019, Huawei’s Competition Strategy: A Financial Perspective, 10.1007/978-981-13-7507-1_2 Bengtsson, 2015, Open to a select few? Matching partners and knowledge content for open innovation performance, Creat. Innov. Manag., 24, 72, 10.1111/caim.12098 Serrano, 2018, Should we make or buy? An update and review, Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., 24, 137, 10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.05.004 Naoyuki Yoshino, 2016, Major challenges facing small and medium-sized enterprises in Asia and solutions for mitigating them, ADBI Work. Pap. Ser., 564, 1 Toh, 2022, Integration and appropriability: A study of process and product components within a firm’s innovation portfolio, Strateg. Manag. J., 43, 1075, 10.1002/smj.3351 Agostini, 2015, The impact of formal and informal appropriability regimes on SME profitability in medium high-tech industries, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 27, 405, 10.1080/09537325.2014.1003207 Teixeira, 2019, Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs, J. Innov. Knowl., 4, 154, 10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002 Yacoub, 2020, Appropriability mechanisms for manufacturing and service firms: The contingencies of openness and knowledge intensity, R D Manag., 50, 551, 10.1111/radm.12411 Chang, 2020, Green Open Innovation Activities and Green Co-Innovation Performance in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Sector, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 10.3390/ijerph17186677 Kim, 2018, Determinants of firm’s innovation-related external knowledge search strategy: The role of potential absorptive capacity and appropriability regime, Int. J. Innov. Manag., 22, 1850044, 10.1142/S1363919618500445 Hall, 2017, Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from the UK, Econ. Innov. New Technol., 26, 42, 10.1080/10438599.2016.1202513 Da Silva, 2019, Open innovation and IPRs: Mutually incompatible or complementary institutions?, J. Innov. Knowl., 4, 248, 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.010 Holgersson, 2022, Value capture in open innovation markets: The role of patent rights for innovation appropriation, Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 25, 320, 10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0114 Laursen, 2014, The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration, Res. Policy, 43, 867, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004 Latour, 2005 Law, 2016, Actor-network theory, and material semiotics Muller, 2015, Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space, Geogr. Compass, 9, 27, 10.1111/gec3.12192 Callon, 2001 Dwiartama, 2014, Exploring agency beyond humans: The compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking, Ecol. Soc., 19, 10, 10.5751/ES-06805-190328 Moller, 2020, Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment, Ind. Mark. Manag., 90, 380, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.013 Cropanzano, 2005, Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review, J. Manag., 31, 874 Rogelberg, 2007 Cook, 1961, Social Exchange Theory Cook, 2013, Social Exchange Theory, 10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_3 Cropanzano, 2017, Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies, Acad. Manag. Ann., 11, 479, 10.5465/annals.2015.0099 Oparaocha, 2016, Towards building internal social network architecture that drives innovation: A social exchange theory perspective, J. Knowl. Manag., 20, 534, 10.1108/JKM-06-2015-0212 Chernyak-Hai, 2018, The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?, Ind. Organ. Psychol., 11, 456, 10.1017/iop.2018.5 Tornblom, 2012 Chang, 2015, Age differences in online social networking: Extending socioemotional selectivity theory to social network sites, J. Broadcasting Electron. Media, 59, 221, 10.1080/08838151.2015.1029126 Tomlinson, 2013, The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multidimensional analysis, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 141, 316, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.012 Boon, 2018, Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., 29, 34, 10.1080/09585192.2017.1380063 Henseler, 2010, Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models: An Illustration of Available Procedures, 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31 Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Mark. Res., 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 Hair, 2017 Frey, 2018, Pilot studies, 10.4135/9781506326139.n518 Hair, 2010 SME Corp Request for SME CORP Available online: https://www.smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/resources/2020-02-14-08-25-09/request-for-sme-corp-malaysia-data (accessed on 1 June 2022) S.K. Thompson Simple Random Sampling, Chapter 2 Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118162934.ch2 (accessed on 1 June 2022) Bryman, 2011