Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening

Alderson, 2004, Practitioners’ views about equity within prenatal screening services, Sociology, 38, 61, 10.1177/0038038504039361 Baillie, 2000, Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormality: Women's reactions to false positive results, British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 377, 10.1348/135910700168991 Bricker, 2000, Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and women's views, Health Technology Assess, 4, 16, 10.3310/hta4160 Brown, 2004 Casper, 1998 Charmaz, 1983, The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation, 109 Draper, 2002, ‘It was a real good show’: The ultrasound scan, fathers and the power of visual knowledge, Sociology of Health and Illness, 24, 771, 10.1111/1467-9566.00318 Fox, 2000, Medical uncertainty revisited Getz, 2003, Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: Advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas, Social Science & Medicine, 56, 2045, 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00200-9 Green, 2003, Women's experiences of prenatal screening and diagnosis, 56 Harris, 2004, “Seeing the baby”: Pleasures and dilemmas of ultrasound technologies for primiparous Australian women, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18, 23, 10.1525/maq.2004.18.1.23 Henry, 2003, Investing in mothering, 185 Heyman, B., Lewando-Hundt, G., Sandall, J., Spencer, K., & Williams, C. (submitted). On being at higher risk: A qualitative study of ‘innovative’ and ‘standard’ prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies. Health, Risk and Society. Illich, 1976 Kerr, 2004 Kitzinger, J., & Williams, C. (in press). Forecasting science future: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate. Social Science & Medicine. Lofland, 1984 McCreight, 2004, A grief ignored: Narratives of pregnancy loss from a male perspective, Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 326, 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00393.x Michaels, 1999, Introduction: The fetal imperative, 1 Mitchell, 2001 Mitchell, 1998, Baby's first picture: The cyborg fetus of ultrasound imaging, 105 NICE. (2003). Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy, pregnant woman. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, Commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Nicolaides, 2000, The 11–14 week scan, Ballieres Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 14, 581, 10.1053/beog.2000.0098 Pilnick, 2004, Presenting and discussing nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in the UK, Midwifery, 20, 82, 10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00056-1 Press, 1997, Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis, Social Science & Medicine, 45, 979, 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7 Rapp, 1999 Rothman, 1989 Sandall, J., Pitson, L., Williams, C., Lewando-Hundt, G., Spencer, K., & Heyman, B. (submitted). ‘Going with the flow’: First trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in an innovative one-stop clinic. Routinisation and constraints on informed decision making. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Spencer, 2004, Factors affecting women's preference for type of prenatal screening test for chromosomal anomalies, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 24, 735, 10.1002/uog.1768 Spencer, 2003, Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: A review of three years prospective experience, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110, 1 Strauss, 1990 Taylor, 1998, Image of contradiction: Obstetrical ultrasound in American culture, 15 Throsby, 2004 Tymstra, 1986, False positive results in screening tests: Experiences of parents of children screened for congenital hypothyroidism, Family Practice, 3, 92, 10.1093/fampra/3.2.92 Weber, 1990 Webster, 2002, Innovative health technologies and the social: Redefining health, medicine and the body, Current Sociology, 50, 443, 10.1177/0011392102050003009 Weinans, 2000, How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, 20, 705, 10.1002/1097-0223(200009)20:9<705::AID-PD904>3.0.CO;2-C Weiss, 1995, Sex-selective abortion: A relational approach, Hypatia, 12, 202, 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01360.x Williams, 2003, The personalization of the fetus, or, ‘He looks just like his father!’, MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 13, 47 Williams, 2005, Framing the fetus in medical work: Rituals and practices, Social Science & Medicine, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.003 Williams, C. (in press). Dilemmas in fetal medicine: Premature application of a technology or responding to women's choice? Sociology of Health and Illness. Williams, 2001, Conflicting perceptions of the fetus: Person, patient, ‘nobody’, commodity?, New Genetics and Society, 20, 225, 10.1080/14636770120092994 Williams, 2002, Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: A qualitative case study, Prenatal Diagnosis, 22, 216, 10.1002/pd.289 Williams, 2002, Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening, Social Science & Medicine, 55, 743, 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00200-3