A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey

Awasthi, 2011, A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality, Comput. Ind. Eng., 61, 637, 10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.019

Beirão, 2007, Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study, Transp. Policy, 14, 478, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009

Celik, 2013, An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul, Transp. Res. Part E: Log. Transp. Rev., 58, 28, 10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006

Chen, 2010, Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 2790, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.012

Chou, 2011, An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted SERVQUAL method, Appl. Soft Comput., 11, 2117, 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.07.010

De Oña, 2013, Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach, Transp. Policy, 29, 219, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001

Dell'Olio, 2011, The quality of service desired by public transport users, Transp. Policy, 18, 217, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005

Eboli, 2008, A stated preference experiment for measuring service quality in public transport, Transp. Plan. Technol., 31, 509, 10.1080/03081060802364471

Eboli, 2011, A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger's point of view, Transp. Policy, 18, 172, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007

Eboli, 2009, A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality, J. Public Transp., 12, 21, 10.5038/2375-0901.12.3.2

European Local Transport Information Service, 2010. Norwich Rail station interchange. Available from: 〈http://www.eltis.org/study_sheet.phtml?study_id=2623&lang1=enS〉 (accessed 06.06.14.).

Federal Transit Administration, 2010

Filipović, 2009, Comparative analysis of the basic features of the expected and perceived quality of mass passenger public transport service in Belgrade, Transport, 24, 265, 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-273

Foote, 2004, Making buses better in Chicago: strategic implementation of customer-derived performance measures from 1995 to 2001, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 1884, 18, 10.3141/1884-03

Gerçek, 2004, A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul, Transportation, 31, 203, 10.1023/B:PORT.0000016572.41816.d2

Hassan, 2013, A multi-dimensional framework for evaluating the transit service performance, Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 50, 47

Istanbul Ulasim A.S. (IUAS), 2013 [online]. Available from: 〈http://www.istanbul-ulasim.com.tr/en〉 (accessed 25.11.13.).

Ju, 2012, Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 3112, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035

Kuo, 2011, A novel interval-valued fuzzy MCDM method for improving airlines' service quality in Chinese cross-strait airlines, Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 47, 1177, 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.007

Kuo, 2012, A soft computing method of performance evaluation with MCDM based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Appl. Soft Comput., 12, 476, 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.020

Lee, L.W., Chen, S.M., 2008. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetic, Taipei, 3260–3265

Mendel, 2006, Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 14, 808, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879986

Mouwen, 2013, Does competitive tendering improve customer satisfaction with public transport? A case study for the Netherlands, Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 51, 29

Nathanail, 2008, Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the Hellenic railways, Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 42, 48

Opricovic, 2004, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 156, 445, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Opricovic, 1998

Parasuraman, 1988, SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring perceptions of service quality, J. Retail., 64, 2

Pucher, 2005, Public transport reforms in Seoul: innovations motivated by funding crisis, J. Public Transp., 8, 41, 10.5038/2375-0901.8.5.3

Redman, 2013, Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review, Transp. Policy, 25, 119, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005

Transportation Research Board, 2003

Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK), 2013 [online]. Available from: 〈http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist〉 (accessed 25.11.13.).

Tyrinopoulos, 2008, Public transit user satisfaction: variability and policy implications, Transp. Policy, 15, 260, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002

Tzeng, 2005, Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation, Energy Policy, 33, 1373, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014

Vahdani, 2010, Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 47, 1231, 10.1007/s00170-009-2241-2

Wall, 2007, Improving bus service quality and information in Winchester, Transp. Policy, 14, 165, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.12.001

Wan, 2013, The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Knowl.-Based Syst., 52, 65, 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.019

Zak, 2011, The methodology of multiple criteria decision making/aiding in public transportation, J. Adv. Transp., 45, 1, 10.1002/atr.108