Understanding the Factors that Influence Perceptions of Post-Wildfire Landscape Recovery Across 25 Wildfires in the Northwestern United States

Environmental Management - Tập 61 - Trang 85-102 - 2017
C. Kooistra1, T. E. Hall1, T. Paveglio2, M. Pickering3
1Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA
2Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, Moscow, USA
3Public Health Program, Eastern Washington University, Spokane, USA

Tóm tắt

Disturbances such as wildfire are important features of forested landscapes. The trajectory of changes following wildfires (often referred to as landscape recovery) continues to be an important research topic among ecologists and wildfire scientists. However, the landscape recovery process also has important social dimensions that may or may not correspond to ecological or biophysical perspectives. Perceptions of landscape recovery may affect people’s attitudes and behaviors related to forest and wildfire management. We explored the variables that influence people’s perceptions of landscape recovery across 25 fires that occurred in 2011 or 2012 in the United States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana and that represented a range of fire behavior characteristics and landscape impacts. Residents near each of the 25 fires were randomly selected to receive questionnaires about their experiences with the nearby fire, including perceived impacts and how the landscape had recovered since the fire. People generally perceived landscapes as recovering, even though only one to two years had passed. Regression analysis suggested that perceptions of landscape recovery were positively related to stronger beliefs about the ecological role of fire and negatively related to loss of landscape attachment, concern about erosion, increasing distance from the fire perimeter, and longer lasting fires. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analysis indicated that the above relationships were largely consistent across fires. These findings highlight that perceptions of post-fire landscape recovery are influenced by more than vegetation changes and include emotional and cognitive factors. We discuss the management implications of these findings.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams J, Kelly E, Shindler B, Wilton J (2005) Value orientation and forest management: the forest health debate. Environ Manage 36(4):495–505 Absher JD, Vaske JJ, Shelby, LB (2009) Residents’ responses to wildland fire programs: a review of cognitive and behavioral studies. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-223. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA Barbero R, Abatzoglou JT, Larkin NK, Kolden CA, Stocks B (2015) Climate change presents increased potential for very large fires in the contiguous United States. Int J Wildland Fire 24(7):892–899 Baruch Y (1999) Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Hum Relat 52(4):421–438 Bickel R (2007) Multilevel analysis for applied research: it’s just regression! Guilford, New York Blanchard B, Ryan RL (2007) Managing the wildland–urban interface in the northeast: perceptions of fire risk and hazard reduction strategies. North J Appl For 24(3):203–208 Borrie WT, McCool S, Whitmore JG (2006) Wildland fire effects on visits and visitors to the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Int J Wilderness 12(1):32–38 Brenkert-Smith H (2006) The place of fire. Nat Hazards Rev 7(3):105–113 Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE (2005) State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: A synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangel Ecol Manag 58(1):1–10 Brunson MW, Shindler BA (2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Soc Natur Resour 17(8):661–678 Burley D, Jenkins P, Laska S, Davis T (2007) Place attachment and environmental change in coastal Louisiana. Organ Environ 20(3):347–366 Burns MR, Cheng AS (2007) Framing the need for active management for wildfire mitigation and forest restoration. Soc Nat Resour 20(3):245–259 Burns MR, Taylor JG, Hogan JT (2008) Integrative healing: the importance of community collaboration in post-fire recovery and pre-fire planning. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, p 81–97 Cohn PJ, Williams DR, Carroll MS (2008) Wildland-urban interface residents’ views on risk and attribution. In: Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds) Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, p 23–43 Cox RS, Perry KME (2011) Like a fish out of water: reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. Am J Commun Psychol 48(3-4):395–411 Davenport MA, Anderson DH (2005) Getting from sense of place to place-based management: an interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Soc Nat Resour 18(7):625–641 Diaz J, Dayal A (2008) Sense of place: a model for community based psychosocial support programs. Australas J Disaster Trauma Stud 1:1174–4707 Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken Doerr SH, Santín C (2016) Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world. Philos Trans R Soc B 371(1696):20150345 Eisenhauer BW, Krannich RS, Blahna DJ (2000) Attachments to special places on public lands: an analysis of activities, reasons for attachments, and community connections. Soc Nat Resour 13:421–444 Eisenman D, McCaffrey S, Donatello I, Marshal G (2015) An ecosystems and vulnerable populations perspective on solastalgia and psychological distress after a wildfire. EcoHealth 12(4):602–610 Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods 12(2):121–138 Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage, London Gobster PH (1999) An ecological esthetic for forest landscape management. Landsc J 18(1):54–64 Gobster PH (1994) The esthetic experience of sustainable forest ecosystems. In: Covington WW, Debano LF (eds) Sustainable ecological systems: implementing an ecological approach to land management (GTR RM-247). USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, p 246–255 Greider T, Garkovitch L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol 59(1):1–24 Gunderson K, Watson A (2007) Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Soc Nat Resour 20(8):705–721 Harvey BJ, Donato DC, Turner MG (2016) High and dry: post‐fire tree seedling establishment in subalpine forests decreases with post‐fire drought and large stand‐replacing burn patches. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25(6):655–669 Heck RH, Thomas SL, Tabata LN (2014) Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge, New York Hodgson RW (2007) Emotions and sensemaking in disturbance: community adaptation to dangerous environments. Hum Ecol Rev 14(2):233–242 Hull RB, Robertson DP, Kendra A (2001) Public understandings of nature: a case study of local knowledge about “natural” forest conditions. Soc Nat Resour 14(4):325–340 Irwin A (2001) Sociology and the environment. Polity Press, Cambridge Islas PV, Vergara DG (2012) Perceived visual landscape changes in a fire prone environment: a multi-method approach. J Environ Psychol 32(2):144–157 Kent B, Gebert K, McCaffrey S, Martin W, Calkin D, Schuster E, Martin I, Wise Bender H, Alward G, Kumagai Y, Cohn P, Carroll M, Williams D, Ekarius C (2003) Social and economic issues of the Hayman Fire. In: Graham RT (ed) Hayman Fire case study (RMRS-GTR-114). USDA Forest Service, Ogden, p 315–396 Kline P (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge, London Kneeshaw K, Vaske JJ, Bright AD, Absher JD (2004) Situational influences of acceptable wildland fire management actions. Soc Nat Resour 17(6):477–489 Kumagai Y, Carroll MS, Cohn P (2004) Coping with interface wildfire as a human event: lessons from the disaster/hazards literature. J For 102(6):28–32 Lannom KO, Tinkham WT, Smith AM, Abatzoglou J, Newingham BA, Hall TE, Morgan P, Strand EK, Paveglio TP, Anderson JW, Sparks AM (2014) Defining extreme wildland fires using geospatial and ancillary metrics. Int J Wildland Fire 23(3):322–337 Lentile LB, Morgan P, Hudak AT, Bobbitt MJ, Lewis SA, Smith AM, Robichaud PR (2007) Post-fire burn severity and vegetation response following eight large wildfires across the western United States. Fire Ecol 3(1):91–108 Lewis JL (2008) Perceptions of landscape change in a rural British Columbia community. Landsc Urban Plan 85(1):49–59 Lindner JR, Murphy TH, Briers GE (2001) Handling nonresponse in social science research. J Agric Educ 42(4):43–53 McCaffrey S (2015) Community wildfire preparedness: a global state-of-the-knowledge summary of social science research. Curr Rep 1(2):81–90 McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B (2013) Social science research related to wildfire management: An overview of recent findings and future research needs. Int J Wildland Fire 22(1):15–24 McCaffrey SM (2006) Prescribed fire: What influences public approval? In: Dickinson MB (ed) Fire in eastern oak forests: delivering science to land managers, proceedings of a conference (GTR NRS-P-1). USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, p 192–198 McCaffrey SM, Olsen CS (2012) Research perspectives on the public and fire management: a synthesis of current social science on eight essential questions (GTR NRS-104). USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square McFarlane BL, McGee TK, Faulkner H (2012) Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories. Int J Wildland Fire 20(8):921–931 Mendez SR, Carroll M, Blatner KA, Findley AJ, Walker GB, Daniels SE (2003) Smoke on the hill: a comparative study of wildfire and two communities. West J Appl For 18(1):60–70 Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Alexandre PM (2015) Adapting to wildfire: rebuilding after home loss. Soc Natur Resour 28(8):839–856 Moody JA, Shakesby RA, Robichaud PR, Cannon SH, Martin DA (2013) Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes. Earth Sci Rev 122:10–37 Morgan P, Moy M, Droske CA, Lewis SA, Lentile LB, Robichaud PR, Hudak AT, Williams CJ (2015) Vegetation response to burn severity, native grass seeding, and salvage logging. Fire Ecol 11(2):31–58 Moritz MA, Hurteau MD, Suding KN, D’Antonio CM (2013) Bounded ranges of variation as a framework for future conservation and fire management. Ann NY Acad Sci 1286(1):92–107 Nelson KC, Monroe MC, Johnson JF (2005) The look of the land: homeowner landscape management and wildfire preparedness in Minnesota and Florida. Soc Nat Resour 18(4):321–336 Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York Olsen CS, Shindler BA (2010) Trust, acceptance, and citizen–agency interactions after large fires: influences on planning processes. Int J Wildland Fire 19(1):137–147 Paccagnella O (2006) Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Eval Rev 30(1):66–85 Paveglio T, Brenkert-Smith H, Hall T, Smith AM (2015b) Understanding social impact from wildfires: advancing means for assessment. Int J Wildland Fire 24(2):212–224 Paveglio T, Kooistra C, Hall T, Pickering T (2016) Understanding the effect of large wildfires on residents’ well-being: what factors influence wildfire impact? For Sci 62(1):59–69 Paveglio T, Moseley C, Carroll MS, Williams DR, Davis EJ, Fischer AP (2015a) Categorizing the social context of the wildland urban interface: adaptive capacity for wildfire and community “archetypes. For Sci 61(2):298–310 Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks Robichaud PR, Beyers JL, Near DG (2000) Evaluating the effectiveness of post-fire rehabilitation treatments (RMRS-GTR-63). USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins Ryan RL, Hamin EM (2008) Wildfires, communities, and agencies: stakeholders’ perceptions of post-fire forest restoration and rehabilitation. J For 106(7):370–379 Ryan RL, Hamin EM (2009) Wildland‐urban interface communities’ response to post-fire salvage logging. West J Appl For 24(1):36–41 Ryan RL, Hamin EM (2006) Engaging communities in post-fire restoration: forest treatments and community-agency relations after the Cerro Grande fire. In: McCaffrey SM (ed) The public and wildland fire management: Social science findings for managers (GTR NRS-1). USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, p 87–96 Schroeder S, Schneider IE (2010) Wildland fire and the wilderness visitor experience. Int J Wilderness 16(1):20–25 Sheehan T, Bachelet D, Ferschweiler K (2015) Projected major fire and vegetation changes in the Pacific Northwest of the conterminous United States under selected CMIP5 climate futures. Ecol Model 317:16–29 Shindler B, Brunson M, Stankey G (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis (PNW-GTR-537). USDA Forest Service, Portland Sieber SS, Medeiros PM, Albuquerque UP (2011) Local perception of environmental change in a semi-arid area of Northeast Brazil: a new approach for the use of participatory methods at the level of family units. J Agric Environ Ethics 24(5):511–531 Sivo SA, Saunders C, Chang Q, Jiang JJ (2006) How low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in IS questionnaire research. J Assoc Inf Syst 7(6):351–412 Smucker KM, Hutto RL, Steele BM (2005) Changes in bird abundance after wildfire: importance of fire severity and time since fire. Ecol Appl 15(5):1535–1549 Spies TA, White EM, Kline JD, Bailey J, Bolte J, Platt E, Olsen CS, Jacobs D, Shindler B, Steen-Adams MM, Hammer R (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 19(3):9 Spigel KM, Robichaud PR (2007) First-year post-fire erosion rates in Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Hydrol Process 21(8):998–1005 Stephenson C, Handmer J, Betts R (2013) Estimating the economic, social and environmental impacts of wildfires in Australia. Environ Hazards 12(2):93–111 Subirós VJ, Rodríguez‐Carreras R, Varga D, Ribas A, Úbeda X, Asperó F, Llausàs A, Outeiro L (2016) Stakeholder perceptions of landscape changes in the Mediterranean mountains of the North‐Eastern Iberian Peninsula. Land Degrad Dev 27(5):1354–1365 Taylor JG, Daniel TC (1984) Prescribed fire: public education and perception. J For 82(6):361–365 Theobald DM, Romme WH (2007) Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface. Landsc Urban Plan 83(4):340–354 Toman E, Shindler B, Olsen CS (2008b) Communication strategies for post-fire planning: lessons learned from forest communities. In: Chavez DJ, Absher JD, Winter PL (eds) Fire social science research from the Pacific Southwest Research Station: studies supported by National Fire Plan funds (GTR PSW-GTR-209). USDA Forest Service, Albany, p 165–179 Toman E, Stidham M, McCaffrey S, Shindler B (2013) Social science at the wildland-urban interface: a compendium of research results to create fire-adapted communities (GTR NRS-111). USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square Toman EL, Shindler B, Absher J, McCaffrey S (2008a) Post-fire communications: the influence of site visits on local support. J For 106(1):25–30 Tuan YF (1977) Space and place. Arnold, London Vining J, Merrick MS (2008) The influence of proximity to a national forest on emotions and fire-management decisions. Environ Manage 41(2):155–167 Westerling AL, Bryant BP, Preisler HK, Holmes TP, Hidalgo HG, Das T, Shrestha SR (2011) Climate change and growth scenarios for California wildfire. Clim Change 109(1):445–463 Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313(5789):940–943 Wimberly MC, Liu Z (2014) Interactions of climate, fire, and management in future forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Manage 327:270–279 Woltman H, Feldstain A, MacKay JC, Rocchi M (2012) An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):52–69 Zaksek M, Arvai JL (2004) Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Anal 24(6):1503–1514