The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions
Tóm tắt
This is a study of the effectiveness of key UN institutions focussing on environment and sustainable development: the global conferences on development and the environment, the CSD and UNEP, primarily its co-ordinating functions. According to the indicators used to measure effectiveness here, it is concluded that the overall effectiveness of these institutions is quite low. This particularly applies to the CSD. UNEP has been quite effective in creating new institutions but has been less effective in co-ordinating them. As to the global conferences, their significance has been reduced over time.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agrawala, S. (1998). Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climatic Change, 39(4), 621–642.
Andonova, L. B., & Levy, M. A. (2003). Franchising global governance: Making sense of the Johannesburg Type II partnerships. In O. S. Stokke & Ø. B. Thommesen (Eds.), Yearbook of international cooperation on environment and development 2003/2004 (pp. 19–32). London: Earthscan.
Andresen, S. (1999). The international whaling regime: Order at the turn of the century? In D. Vidas & W. Østreng (Eds.), Order for the oceans at the turn of the century (pp. 215–231). Kluwer Law International.
Andresen, S. (2001). Global environmental governance: UN fragmentation and co-ordination. In O. S. Stokke & Ø. B. Thommesen (Eds.), Yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development 2001/2002 (pp. 19–25). London: Earthscan, for the Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Andresen, S., & Rosendal, K. (forthcoming). The role of the United Nations environmental programme in the co-ordination of multilateral environmental agreements. In F. Biermann, B. Siebenhuener, & A. Schreyogg (Eds.), International organisations in global environmental governance (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Routledge.
Andresen, S., & Skjærseth, J. B. (1999). Can international environmental secretariats promote effective co-operation? Paper presented at the United Nations University Conference on Synergies and Co-ordination between Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Tokyo.
Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49.
Bernauer, T. (1995). The effect of international environmental institutions: How we might learn more. International Organisations, 49(2), 351–377.
Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of intergovernmental organisations in international environmental politics. Global Environmental Change, 14, 189–193.
Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (Eds.) (2005). A world environmental organisation: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bigg, T. (2004). The world summit on sustainable development: Was it worthwhile? In T. Bigg (Ed.), Survival for a small planet (pp. 3–23). London: Earthscan.
Bigg, T., & Dodds, F. (1997). The UN commission on sustainable development. In F. Dodd (Ed.), The way forward beyond Agenda 21 (pp. 15–36). London: Earthscan.
Buenker, M. A. (2002). Progress at Bali––but not enough for Johannesburg! Environmental Policy and Law, 32(3–4), 140–145.
Carstensen, J. (2004). EC environmental law and multilateral environmental agreements for Europe. UNITAR paper on the EU environmental acquis.
Charnovitz, S. (2005). Towards a world environmental organization: Reflections upon a vital debate. In F. Biermann & S. Bauer (Eds.), A world environmental organisation: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance (pp. 87–117). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Chasek, P. (2000). The UN commission on sustainable development: The first five years. In P. Chasek (Ed.), The global environment in the twenty-first century: Prospects for international cooperation (pp. 378–398). New York: United Nations University.
Dodds, F., Chambers, B., & Kanie, N. (2002). International environmental governance: The question of reform: Key issues and proposals. Tokyo: United Nations University.
Downie, D. L., & Levy, M. (2000). The UN environmental programme at a turning point: Options for change. In P. Chasek (Ed.), The global environment in the twenty-first century: Prospects for international cooperation (pp. 355–378). New York: United Nations University Press.
ENB (Earth Negotiation Bulletin) (2007). Summary of the intergovernmental preparatory meeting for the fifteenth session of the commission on sustainable development, 5(243, March).
Elliott, L. (2005). The United Nations’ record on environmental governance: An assessment. In F. Biermann & S. Bauer (Eds.), A world environmental organisation: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance (pp. 27–57). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Esty, D., & Ivanova, M. (2002). Revitalizing global environmental governance: A function-driven approach. In D. Esty & M. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forests & Environmental Studies.
Grubb, M., Koch, M., Munson, A., Sullivan, F., & Thomson, K. (1993). The ‘Earth Summit’ agreements: A guide and assessment. London: Earthscan.
Gulbrandsen, L. (2003). UN conference diplomacy on environment and development: From norm-creation to lack of action? Internasjonal Politikk, 61(1), 3–28 (In Norwegian).
Gulbrandsen, L., & Humphreys, D. (2006). International initiatives to address tropical timber logging and trade. FNI Report 4/2006. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Heggelund, G., & Backer, E. B. (2007). China and UN environmental policy: Institutional growth, learning and implementation. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
Hyvarinen, J., & Brack, D. (2000). Global environmental institutions: Analysis and options for change. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Ivanova, M. (2005). Can the anchor hold? Rethinking the United Nations Environment Programme for the 21st century. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
Ivanova, M. (2007). Designing the United Nations environmental programme: A story of compromise and confrontation. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
Jacob, T. (2002). Reflections on Johannesburg: The larger context. Memo, DuPont.
Kaasa, S. (2005). The commission on sustainable development: A study of institutional design, distribution of capabilities and entrepreneurial leadership. FNI Report 5/2005. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Kaasa, S. (2007). The UN commission on sustainable development: Which mechanisms explains its accomplishments? Global Environmental Politics, 7(3), forthcoming.
Levy M., Young, O. R., & Zurn, M. (1995). The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations, Oxford University Press 1(3), 267–330.
Linnér, B.-O., & Sellin, H. (2005). The road to Rio: Early efforts on environment and development. In A. C. Kallhauge, G. Sjøstedt, & E. Corell (Eds.), Global challenges furthering the multilateral process for sustainable development (pp. 58–74). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.
Mee, L. (2005). The role of UNEP and UNDP in multilateral environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements, 5(3), 227–263.
Meyerson, F. (2003). Burning the bridge to the 21st century: The end of the era of integrated conferences? Environment and Security Report, 9, 6−12.
Miles, E. L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J. B., & Carlin, E. M. (Eds.) (2002). Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Najam, A. (2003). The case against a new international environmental organization. Global Governance, 9(3), 367–384.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation and engagement. International Environmental Agreements, 5(3), 303–321.
Najam, A., Papa, M., & Taiyab, N. (2006) Global environmental governance: A reform agenda. IISD - International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Najam, A., Poling, J., Yamagishi, N., Straub, D., Sarno, J., Ritter, S., & Kim, E. (2002). From Rio to Johannesburg: Progress and prospects. Environment, 44(7), 26–38.
Oberthur, S. (2002). Clustering of multilateral environmental agreements: Potentials and limitations. International Environmental Agreements, 2, 317–340.
Rosendal, G. K. (2007). Norway in UN environmental policies: Ambitions and influence. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
Rosendal, G. K., & Andresen, S. (2003). UNEP’s role in enhancing problem-solving capacity in multilateral environmental agreements: Coordination and assistance in the biodiversity conservation cluster. FNI Report 10/2003. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Rutherford, P. (2003). Talking the talk: Business discourse at the world summit on sustainable development. Environmental Politics, 12(2), 145–150.
Seyfang, G. (2003). Environmental mega-conferences––from Stockholm to Johannesburg and beyond. Global Environmental Change, 13, 223–228.
Speth, J. G. (2003). Perspectives on the Johannesburg summit. Environment, 45(1), 26–29.
Töpfer, K. (2002). From Rio to earth summit. Foreword. In F. Dodds (Ed.), Earth Summit 2002: A new deal. London: Earthscan.
United Nations (2006). Delivering as one report of the Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel. New York: United Nations.
Upton, S. (2004). The international framework for action: Is the CSD the best we can do? In T. Bigg (Ed.), Survival for a small planet (pp. 85–101). London: Earthscan.
Victor, D. (1999). The market of international environmental protection services and the perils of coordination. Background paper presented at the United Nations University Conference on Synergies and Co-ordination between Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Tokyo.
Wagner, L. (2005). A commission will lead them: The UN commission on sustainable development and UNCED follow-up. In A. C. Kallhauge, G. Sjøstedt, & E. Corell (Eds.), Global challenges furthering the multilateral process for sustainable development (pp. 103–123). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.
Wapner, P. (2003). World summit on sustainable development: Toward a post-Jo’burg environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 1–9.
Wettestad, J. (1999). Designing effective international regimes: The key conditions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Yamin, F. (1998). The CSD reporting process: A quiet step forward for sustainable development. In H. O. Bergesen, G. Parmann, & Ø. B. Thommessen (Eds.), Yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development 1998/1999 (pp. 42–62). London: Earthscan Publications.
Young, O. (2007). Designing environmental governance systems––The diagnostic method. IHDP Update, 1, 9–11.