Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks

Soft Computing - Tập 14 - Trang 451-463 - 2009
F. J. Cabrerizo1, J. M. Moreno2, I. J. Pérez3, E. Herrera-Viedma3
1Department of Software Engineering and Computer Systems, Distance Learning University of Spain, Madrid, Spain
2Department of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
3Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

Tóm tắt

Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts, while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more flexible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 24:201–222 Ben-Arieh D, Chen Z (2006) Linguistic labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision-making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36:558–568 Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1977) Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proceedings of 1977 IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1303–1309 Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:255–268 Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus for a fuzzy majority in group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27:126–132 Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Inform Technol Decis Making 8:109–131 Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48 Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attributive decision making: theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1993) On aggregation operations of linguistic labels. Int J Intell Syst 8:351–370 Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H (1993) Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using OWA (ordered weighted average) operators. Control Cybern 22:78–86 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:175–190 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Int J Approx Reason 16:309–334 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 88:31–49 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1998) Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94:287–308 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161 Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez M (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:354–370 Herrera-Viedma E (2001) An information retrieval system with ordinal linguistic weighted queries based on two weighting elements. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 9:77–88 Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402 Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658 Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877 Herrera-Viedma E, Pasi G, López-Herrera AG, Porcel C (2006) Evaluating the information quality of web sites: a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(4):538–549 Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) A group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37:176–189 Herrera-Viedma E, López-Herrera AG (2007) A model of information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst 22:1197–1214 Kacprzyk J (1987) On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek J (ed) The analysis of fuzzy information. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–130 Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1986) Soft consensus measure for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control Cybernet 15:309–323 Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34:316–323 Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31 Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H, Fedrizzi M (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D (2008) Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Comput 12:289–299 Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:2 279–290 Montero J (2008) The impact of fuzziness in social choice paradoxes. Soft Comput 12:177–182 Nurmi H (2008) Fuzzy social choice: a selective retrospect. Soft Comput 12:281–288 Roubens M (1997) Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 90:199–206 Spillman B, Bezdek J, Spillman R (1979) Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets. Kybernetes 8:203–211 Spillman B, Spillman R, Bezdek J (1980) A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups. In: Wang PP, Chang SK (eds) Fuzzy automata and decision processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 331–356 Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 18:183–190 Yager RR, Filev DP (1994) Parameterized and-like and or-like OWA operators. Int J Gen Syst 22:297–316 Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9:149–184