Comparative Evaluation of the Antioxidant Capacities, Organic Acids, and Volatiles of Papaya Juices Fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum

Journal of Food Quality - Tập 2018 - Trang 1-12 - 2018
Ronghao Chen1, Wenxue Chen1, Haiming Chen1, Guanfei Zhang1, Weijun Chen1
1College of Food Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan, 570228, China

Tóm tắt

Fermentation of foods by lactic acid bacteria is a useful way to improve the nutritional value of foods. In this study, the health-promoting effects of fermented papaya juices by two species, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum, were determined. Changes in pH, reducing sugar, organic acids, and volatile compounds were determined, and the vitamin C, total phenolic content, and flavonoid and antioxidant capacities during the fermentation process were investigated. Juices fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum had similar changes in pH and reducing sugar content during the 48 h fermentation period. Large amounts of aroma-associated compounds and organic acids were produced, especially lactic acid, which increased significantly (p<0.05) (543.18 mg/100 mL and 571.29 mg/100 mL, resp.), improving the quality of the beverage. In contrast, the production of four antioxidant capacities in the fermented papaya juices showed different trends after 48 hours’ fermentation by two bacteria. Lactobacillus plantarum generated better antioxidant activities compared to Lactobacillus acidophilus after 48 h of fermentation. These results indicate that fermentation of papaya juice can improve its utilization and nutritional effect.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S5

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.016

10.1007/s00217-005-0159-y

10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.018

10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.012

10.1016/j.tifs.2013.03.006

10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.005

10.1016/j.foodres.2007.10.010

10.1080/07373937.2011.566968

2004, Journal of Microbiology, 42, 315

10.1016/j.foodres.2010.11.035

10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.130

10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.003

10.1017/S0007114510003740

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x

10.1016/j.ifset.2015.09.018

10.1002/jsfa.4092

10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.103

10.1038/nature06856

10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.021

10.1016/j.lwt.2014.10.036

10.1021/jf070903c

10.1016/j.tifs.2012.01.006

10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.026

10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.010

10.1016/j.fm.2011.02.011

10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.013

10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.013

10.1016/j.jff.2014.03.009

10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.023

10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.095

10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.048

10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.062

10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.050

10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.006

10.1007/s13197-015-1914-0

10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.082

10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.019

10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.124

10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.058

10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.001

10.1016/j.jff.2014.06.008

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.09.016

10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.048

10.1007/s10068-012-0171-5

10.1021/jf401240p

10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.09.007

10.1016/j.jff.2017.03.018

10.1007/s11694-017-9491-8

10.1016/j.lwt.2016.09.026

10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.089

10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.095

10.1002/jsfa.3343

10.1111/jfpp.12944

10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.042

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.09.016

10.1016/j.ifset.2011.10.008

10.1016/j.lwt.2014.11.013

10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.124

10.1128/AEM.02189-06

10.1051/lait:1991541

10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.070

10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.088

10.1271/bbb.80743

10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02369.x

10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.116

10.1016/j.fm.2015.10.018

10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.022

10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.025

10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.031

10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.011

10.1002/9780470113554.ch78

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.006

10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01945.x

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.10.017

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.02.014