Measuring environmental efficiency of agricultural water use: A Luenberger environmental indicator

Journal of Environmental Management - Tập 145 - Trang 314-320 - 2014
Md A.S. Azad1, Tihomir Ancev2
1School of Economics, 206 Biomedical Building (C81), The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
2School of Economics, 217 Biomedical Building (C81), The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Azad, 2010, Using ecological indices to measure economic and environmental performance of irrigated agriculture, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1731, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.003 Barros, 2007, Comparing productivity change in Italian and Portuguese seaports using the Luenberger indicator approach, Marit. Econ. Logist., 9, 138, 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100176 Bellenger, 2009, An economic approach to environmental indices, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2216, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.004 Boussemart, 2003, Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices: theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration, Bull. Econ. Res., 55, 391, 10.1111/1467-8586.00183 Brandouy, 2010, Portfolio performance gauging in discrete time using a Luenberger productivity indicator, J. Bank. Financ., 34, 1899, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.015 Briec, 2004, A Luenberger–Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indicator: its relation to the Hicks–Moorsteen productivity index and the Luenberger productivity indicator, Econ. Theory, 23, 925, 10.1007/s00199-003-0403-2 Chambers, 1996 Chambers, 1996, Productivity growth in APEC countries, Pac. Econ. Rev., 1, 181, 10.1111/j.1468-0106.1996.tb00184.x Chung, 1997, Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach, J. Environ. Manag., 51, 229 Epure, 2011, Bank productivity and performance groups: a decomposition approach based upon the Luenberger productivity indicator, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 211, 630, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.041 Falavigna, 2013, Environmental efficiency, productivity and public funds: the case of the Italian agricultural industry, Agric. Syst., 121, 73, 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.07.003 Färe, 2004, Environmental performance: an index number approach, Resour. Energy Econ., 26, 343, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.10.003 Färe, 2001, Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth, J. Reg. Sci., 41, 381, 10.1111/0022-4146.00223 Grafton, 2010 Guironnet, 2007, Human capital allocation and over education: a measure of French productivity (1987, 1999), Econ. Model., 24, 398, 10.1016/j.econmod.2006.09.003 Hoang, 2011, Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: a nutrient balance approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 62, 462, 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.05.009 Kumar, 2006, Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist–Luenberger index, Ecol. Econ., 56, 280, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.02.004 Kumar, 2009, Measurement of environmental efficiency and productivity: a cross-country analysis, Environ. Dev. Econ., 14, 473, 10.1017/S1355770X08005032 Managi, 2003, Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices in Japan, 1955–1995, Appl. Econ. Lett., 10, 581, 10.1080/1350485032000100170 Nakano, 2008, Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry, Energy Policy, 36, 201, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.003 Oh, 2010, A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index, J. Prod. Anal., 34, 183, 10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y Quiggin, 2001, Environmental economics and the Murray-Darling river system, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 45, 67, 10.1111/1467-8489.00134 Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2012, Environmental impact, export intensity, and productivity interactions: an empirical index analysis of the agri-food industry in Spain, Can. J. Agric. Econ., 60, 33, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2011.01230.x Williams, 2011, The Luenberger indicator and productivity growth: a note on the European savings banks sector, Appl. Econ., 43, 747, 10.1080/00036840802599859 Zhang, 2011, Productivity growth and environmental regulations – accounting for undesirable outputs: analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist-Luenberger index, Ecol. Econ., 70, 2369, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.019