Comparing Outcomes of Medial Parapatellar and Subvastus Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2010 Hofmann, 1991, Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop, 70 Roysam, 2001, Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial, J Arthroplasty, 16, 454, 10.1054/arth.2001.22388 Weinhardt, 2004, Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 124, 401, 10.1007/s00402-004-0692-3 Cila, 2002, Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 122, 65, 10.1007/s004020100319 Faure, 1993, Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 8, 511, 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80216-0 Cameron, 2001, Subvastus versus medial parapatellar arthrotomy in total knee arthroplasty, J Appl Res, 1, 95 Holtby, 1996, Osteonecrosis and resorption of the patella after total knee replacement: a case report, Clin Orthop, 155, 10.1097/00003086-199607000-00024 Kayler, 1988, Surgical interruption of patella blood supply by total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop, 221 Matsueda, 2000, Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop, 161, 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00020 Cushner, 2003, The subvastus approach to the knee, J Knee Surg, 16, 52 Knezevich, 1992, Comparison of subvastus quadriceps-sparing and standard quadriceps-splitting approaches in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Orthop Trans, 16, 615 Sporer, 2006, The minimally invasive subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty, J Knee Surg, 19, 58 Bourke, 2010, Systematic review of medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 25, 728, 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.008 2009, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Main text. Version 5.0.2 Jadad, 1996, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized and controlled trials: is blinding necessary, Control Clin Trials, 17, 1, 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 Khan, 2005, Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty (protocol), Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD005329 Bridgman, 2009, Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial, Knee, 16, 216, 10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.012 Insall, 1989, Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system, Clin Orthop, 248, 13, 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004 Dawson, 1998, Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 63, 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859 Podsiadlo, 1991, The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons, J Am Geriatr Soc, 39, 142, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x Russell, 2007, Goniometry via the internet, Aust J Physiother, 52, 136, 10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70051-X Garson, 2011, Linear mixed models: Heirarchical, linear, random effects, multilevel, random coefficients, and repeated measures models Conaghan, 2007, Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement, Arthritis Rheum, 57, 1363, 10.1002/art.23091 Karachalios, 2008, Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90-B, 584, 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20122