Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: Characteristics and future potential
Tóm tắt
The concept of small-scale forest ownership means different things to different people in different countries. Traditionally, within Europe, many small-scale forest owners were economically dependent on their forests, either for home or commercial use, usually linked with farming activities. However, many small-scale forest owners are no longer economically dependent on their forests and these owners appear to increasingly focus their management on amenity functions rather than on production functions. These changes in forest ownership are related to more general trends in rural dynamics. As a result of these dynamics, increasingly rural development is not focused on agricultural modernisation, but on rural restructuring. A description of how forest owners themselves perceive their forests has been made on the basis of a survey amongst 1401 small-scale forest owners in eight European countries. Data were collected on ownership and management characteristics as well as on the perspectives regarding the future of the rural area in which the forests are located. The median forest size varies between 1.3 ha in Greece to 4.5 ha in Spain. About 30% of the forest owners have an indifferent attitude to their forests. This group includes many absentee owners and retired local owners, who own only forest lands but who are not economically dependent on these forests. Almost 40% of the forest owners are only modestly interested in forest management; often they have an environmental management orientation. This group includes many hobby owners and part-time employed people. Only one-third of the private forest owners are still economically dependent on their forests; they have predominantly a multifunctional management orientation. The survey findings suggest that policies to stimulate forestry development should be diversified in respect to these different types of small-scale forest owners.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Boon, T.E., Meilby, H. and Thorsen B.J. (2004), ‘Forest owner typology to improve policy-practice communication’, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(4): 45–55.
COST Action E30, (2001), Economic integration of urban consumers’ demand and rural forestry production, European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST), Brussels, http://cost.cordis.lu/sre/pdf/E30-e.pdf, accessed 14th February 2005.
De Deugd, M. and Elands, B.H.M. (2001), Comparative Characterisation of Case-study Areas, working paper, Multifor.RD research project, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Elands, B.H.M. (2004), ‘Call for a local say in forest policies and programmes’, in G. Buttoud, B. Solberg, I. Tikkanen and B. Pajari (eds), The Evaluation of Forest Policies and Programmes, EFI Proceedings No. 52, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 123–134.
Elands, B.H.M. and Wiersum, K.F. (2001), ‘Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses’, Forest Policy and Economics, 3(1): 5–16.
Elands, B.H.M. and Wiersum, K.F. (2003), Forestry and rural development in Europe. Research results and policy implications of a comparative European study, Nature Forest in Society Report 2003-2, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Elands, B.H.M., O’Leary, T.N. and Wiersum, K.F. (2004a), ‘What do urbanised and rural societies expect from their forests?’, in Proceedings IUFRO European Regional Conference ‘Forestry Serving Urbanised Societies’, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 27–30, 2002, IUFRO World Series Vol. 14, pp. 233–254.
Elands, B.H.M., O’Leary, T.N., Boerwinkel, H.W.J. and Wiersum, K.F. (2004b), ‘Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe’, Forest Policy and Economics, 6(5): 469–482.
Glück, P. and Weiss, G. (eds) (1996), Forestry in the context of rural development; future research needs, EFI Proceedings No. 15, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland.
Harrison, S., Herbohn, J. and Niskanen, A. (2002), ‘Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: what’s in a name?’, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 1(1): 1–11.
Hoggart, H., Buller, H. and Black, R. (1995), Rural Europe: Identity and Change, Edward Arnold, London.
Karppinen, H. (1997), ‘Objectives of non-industrial private forest owners: regional differences and future trends in Finland’, in O. Saastamoinen and S. Tikka (eds), Proceedings of Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Mekrijärvi, Finland, March 1996, Scandinavian Forest Economics, 36: 197–213.
Kusel, J. (2001), ‘Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities’, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 31(1/2): 359–384.
Kvarda, E. (2004), ‘Non-agricultural forest owners in Austria, a new type of forest ownership’, Forest Policy and Economics 6(5): 459–467.
Marsden, T. (1998), ‘New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces’, Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1): 107–117.
Praestholm, S. (2002), ‘Hobby landowners and aforestation in Europe: perspectives for sustainable land use planning’, paper presented at ISOMUL 2002 Conference ‘Collaborative Planning for the Metropolitan Landscape’, Bellingham, Washington State.
Schraml, U. (2004), ‘Rise and fall of programmatic approaches in German small-scale forest owner research’, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Contributions of Family-farm Enterprises to Sustainable Rural Development, Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultat der Universitat Freiburg und Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Wurttember, Berichte Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Vol. 51, pp. 80–93.
UN-ECE/FAO, (1992), The Forest Resources of the Temperate Zones, The UN-ECE/FAO 1990 Forest Resource Assessment, Vol. 1, General Forest Resource Information, United Nations, New York.
Van der Ploeg, J.D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannioin, J., Marsden, T., De Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzman, E. and Ventura, F. (2000), ‘Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory’, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4): 391–408.
Van der Ploeg, J.D. and Wiersum, K.F. (1996), ‘Styles of forest management by small forest owners, characteristics and scope for rural development’, in P. Glück and G. Weiss (eds), Forestry in the Context of Rural Development: Future Research Needs, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, EFI Proceedings No. 15, pp. 45–57.
Wiersum, K.F. and Van Laar, J. (1999), ‘The changing social role of farm woodlands in the Netherlands’, in P.J. Burgess, E.D.R. Brierley, J. Morris and J. Evans (eds), Farm Woodlands for the Future, Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, pp. 23–29.
Wiersum, K.F. and Elands, B.H.M. (eds) (2002), The Changing Role of Forestry in Europe: Perspectives for Rural Development, Nature Forest in Society 2002–02, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Wiersum, K.F., Elands, B.H.M. and O’Leary, T.N. (2004), ‘Landowners’ perspectives on the future of rural Europe: consequences for farm forestry’, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Contributions of Family-farm Enterprises to Sustainable Rural Development. Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultat der Universitat Freiburg und Forstliche Forschung, Vol. 51, pp.105–126.
Ziegenspeck, S., Hardter, U. and Schraml, U. (2004), ‘Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change’, Forest Policy and Economics, 6(5): 447–458.