Designing fecal pellet surveys for snowshoe hares
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, 2001, The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 29, 1294
Anderson, 2003, Response to Engeman: index values rarely constitute reliable information, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 31, 288
Ausband, 2005, Effects of precommercial thinning on snowshoe hare habitat use during winter in low-elevation montane forests, Can. J. For. Res., 35, 206, 10.1139/x04-152
Bailey, 2004, Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders, Ecol. Appl., 14, 692, 10.1890/03-5012
Campbell, 2004, Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods, J. Appl. Ecol., 41, 1185, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00964.x
Chandler, 1995, Sampling adults of Eoscarta carnifex (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and their associated symptoms on sugarcane, J. Econ. Entomol., 88, 1301, 10.1093/jee/88.5.1301
Cho, 1995, Spatial distribution and sampling procedures for Frankliniella spp. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in staked tomato, J. Econ. Entomol., 88, 1658, 10.1093/jee/88.6.1658
Darveau, 1998, Riparian forest strips as habitat for snowshoe hare in a boreal balsam fir forest, Can. J. For. Res., 28, 1494, 10.1139/x98-110
de Bellefeuille, 2001, Clear-cutting and regeneration practices in Quebec boreal balsam fir forest: effects on snowshoe hare, Can. J. For. Res., 31, 41, 10.1139/x00-140
Forys, 1997, Comparison of 2 methods to estimate density of an endangered lagomorph, J. Wildl. Manage, 61, 86, 10.2307/3802417
Fuller, 2007, Winter habitat selection by Canada Lynx in Maine: prey abundance or accessibility?, J. Wildl. Manage., 71, 1980, 10.2193/2006-288
Fuller, 1986, Density-related changes in winter distribution of snowshoe hares in north-central Minnesota, J. Wildl. Manage., 50, 261, 10.2307/3801908
Green, 1970, On fixed precision level sequential sampling, Res. Popul. Ecol., 12, 249, 10.1007/BF02511568
Griffin, 2007, Precommercial thinning reduces snowshoe hare abundance in the short term, J. Wildl. Manage., 71, 559, 10.2193/2004-007
Hodges, 1999, Proximate factors affecting snowshoe hare movements during a cyclic population low phase, Ecoscience, 6, 487, 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682558
Hodges, 2000, The ecology of snowshoe hares in Northern Boreal Forests, 117
Hodges, 2000, Ecology of snowshoe hares in Southern Boreal and Montane Forests, 163
Homyack, 2007, Effects of precommercial thinning on snowshoe hares in Maine, J. Wildl. Manage., 71, 4, 10.2193/2005-481
Homyack, 2006, Quantifying densities of snowshoe hares in Maine using pellet plots, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 34, 74, 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[74:QDOSHI]2.0.CO;2
Hood, G. M., 2005. PopTools version 2.7.1. Available at http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools.
Kloor, 1999, Conservation biology—Lynx and biologists try to recover after disastrous start, Science, 285, 320, 10.1126/science.285.5426.320
Krebs, 1987, Estimation of snowshoe hare population density from turd transects, Can. J. Zool., 65, 565, 10.1139/z87-087
Krebs, 2001, Estimation of snowshoe hare population density from pellet plots—a further evaluation, Can. J. Zool., 79, 1, 10.1139/z00-177
Langbein, 1999, Techniques for assessing the abundance of brown hares, Lepus europaeus, Mamm. Rev., 29, 93, 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1999.00040.x
Malloy, 2000, Snowshoe hare, Lepus americanus, fecal pellet fluctuations in western Montana, Can. Field Nat., 114, 409
Massei, 1998, Fallow deer and wild boar pellet group disappearance in a Mediterranean area, J. Wildl. Manage., 62, 1086, 10.2307/3802561
McCann, 2008, Using pellet counts to estimate snowshoe hare numbers in Minnesota, J. Wildl. Manage., 72, 955, 10.2193/2007-083
McKelvey, 2002, Effects of plot size and shape on pellet density estimates for snowshoe hares, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 30, 751
McKelvey, 2001, Population estimation with sparse data: the role of estimators versus indices revisited, Can. J. Zool., 79, 1754, 10.1139/z01-139
MicroSoft Inc., 2003. Microsoft Office Professional Edition.
Mills, 2005, Pellet count indices compared to mark-recapture estimates for evaluating snowshoe hare density, J. Wildl. Manage., 69, 1053, 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1053:PCICTM]2.0.CO;2
Murray, 2005, Assessment of potential bias with snowshoe hare fecal pellet-plot counts, J. Wildl. Manage., 69, 385, 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0385:AOPBWS>2.0.CO;2
Murray, 2002, Estimating low-density snowshoe hare populations using fecal pellet counts, Can. J. Zool., 80, 771, 10.1139/z02-027
Newbury, 2005, The effects of clearcutting on snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) relative abundance in central Labrador, For. Ecol. Manage., 210, 131, 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.013
Potvin, 2005, Response of beaver, moose, and snowshoe hare to clear-cutting in a Quebec boreal forest: a reassessment 10 years after cut, Can. J. For. Res., 35, 151, 10.1139/x04-151
Prugh, 2004, Snowshoe hare pellet-decay rates and aging in different habitats, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 32, 386, 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[386:SHPRAA]2.0.CO;2
Roppe, 1978, Effects of fire on wildlife in a lodgepole pine forest, Southwest. Nat., 23, 279, 10.2307/3669776
Ruggiero, 2000, The scientific basis for lynx conservation: qualified insights, 443
StatSoft Inc., 1995. Statistica for Windows, Version 5. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Sullivan, 2002, Influence of conventional and chemical thinning on stand structure and diversity of plant and mammal communities in young lodgepole pine forest, For. Ecol. Manage., 170, 173, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00775-7
Sullivan, 2006, Influence of repeated fertilization on forest ecosystems: relative habitat use by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), Can. J. For. Res., 36, 2080, 10.1139/x06-093
Taylor, 1961, Aggregation, variance and the mean, Nature, 189, 732, 10.1038/189732a0
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2000. Determination of threatened status for the contiguous U.S. distinct population segment of the Canada Lynx and related rule. Federal Register 65, pp. 16052–16086.
Vernes, 1999, Pellet counts to estimate density of a rainforest kangaroo, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 27, 991
Walsh, 2001, Estimates of forest elephant abundance: projecting the relationship between precision and effort, J. Appl. Ecol., 38, 217, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00578.x
