Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics
Tóm tắt
The notion of ‘core documents’, first introduced in the context of co-citation analysis and later re-introduced for bibliographic coupling, refers to the representation of the core of a publication set according to given criteria. In the present study, the notion of core documents is extended to the combination of citation-based and textual links. It is shown that core documents defined this way can be used to represent and describe document clusters and topics at different levels of aggregation. Methodology is illustrated using the example of two ISI Subject Categories selected from applied and social sciences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek—analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Jünger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 77–103). New York: Springer.
Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, Part 1: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233–251.
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis, Part II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 252–266.
Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195–221.
Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & de Moor, B. (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1548–1572.
Janssens, F., Zhang, L., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes. Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 683–702.
Lamirel, J.C., Ta A.P., & Attik, M. (2008), Novel labeling strategies for hierarchical representation of multidimensional data analysis results. In: A. Gammerman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (Track 595-138, pp. 169–174), 11–13 Feb 2008, Innsbruck, Austria. Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.
Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30, 78–82.
Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature—new measure of relationship between 2 documents. JASIS, 24(4), 265–269.
Zhang, L., Glänzel, W., & Liang, L. (2009). Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators. Scientometrics, 81(3), 821–838.
Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30(1), 333–351.