Production pathways for profitability and valuing ecosystem services for willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications

Sustainable Production and Consumption - Tập 36 - Trang 281-291 - 2023
David Livingstone1,2, Beatrice M. Smyth1, Erin Sherry3, Simon T. Murray4, Aoife M. Foley1,5, Gary A. Lyons2, Christopher R. Johnston2
1Queen's University Belfast, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ashby Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AH, Northern Ireland, UK
2Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
3Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX Northern Ireland, UK
4CASE (Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy), Queen's University Belfast, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
5Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adenuga, 2020, Analysis of the effect of alternative agri-environmental policy instruments on production performance and nitrogen surplus of representative dairy farms, Agric. Syst., 184 Agostini, 2021, Biofuels from perennial energy crops on buffer strips: a win-win strategy, J. Clean. Prod., 297, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126703 Balaine, 2020, Land use policy can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms, Land Use Policy, 92 Bank of Ireland UK, 2021Bank of Ireland UK. (2021). Personal communication. Börjesson, 1999, Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—II: economic valuation, Biomass Bioenergy, 16, 155, 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00081-6 Bressler, 2017, Valuation of ecosystem services of commercial shrub willow (Salix spp.) woody biomass crops, Environ. Monit. Assess., 189, 10.1007/s10661-017-5841-6 Buckley, 2012, Supply of an ecosystem service-farmers'willingness to adopt riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments, Environ. Sci. Policy, 24, 101, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.022 Buckley, 2019 Burke Cathcart, 2021, An economic analysis of anaerobic digestate fuel pellet production: can digestate fuel pellets add value to existing operations?, Clean. Eng. Technol., 3 Christen, 2013, Buffers for biomass production in temperate European agriculture: a review and synthesis on function, ecosystem services and implementation, Biomass Bioenergy, 55, 53, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.053 Committee on Climate Change DAERA, 2015 DAERA, 2018 DAERA DAERA, 2020 DAERA, 2020 DAERA, 2021 DAERA, 2022 Daily, 1997 Dias, 2017, Life cycle assessment of thermal energy production from short-rotation willow biomass in Southern Ontario, Canada, Appl. Energy, 204, 343, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.051 2018 2018 Ferrarini, 2017, Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: a state-of-the-art review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 73, 277, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052 González-García, 2014, Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of forest operations in Europe: environmental and energy profiles, J. Clean. Prod., 66, 188, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.067 Hammar, 2017, Climate impact assessment of willow energy from a landscape perspective: a Swedish case study, GCB Bioenergy, 9, 973, 10.1111/gcbb.12399 Hauk, 2014, Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass - a review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 29, 435, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.103 Hawkins, 2021 Hénault-Ethier, 2018, Potential efficiency of grassy or shrub willow buffer strips against nutrient runoff from soybean and corn fields in southern Quebec,Canada, J. Environ. Qual., 48, 352, 10.2134/jeq2016.10.0391 2020 Jiang, 2022, A sustainable agricultural supply chain considering substituting organic manure for chemical fertilizer, Sustain.Prod.Consum., 29, 432, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.025 Laurett, 2021, Sustainable development in agriculture and its antecedents, barriers and consequences – an exploratory study, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 27, 298, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.032 Leahy, 2020, Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris agreement, Front.Sustain.Food Syst., 4, 1 Livingstone, 2021, Willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications to reduce strain on the food-energy-water nexus, Biomass Bioenergy, 144 Livingstone, 2022, Life cycle assessment of a short-rotation coppice willow riparian buffer strip for farm nutrient mitigation and renewable energy production, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 158, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112154 Longato, 2019, Bioenergy and ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in marginal agricultural lands: a remote-sensing-based assessment method, J. Clean. Prod., 237, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117672 McDowall, 2021 Murphy, 2014, Energy requirements and environmental impacts associated with the production of short rotation willow (Salix sp.) chip in Ireland, GCB Bioenergy, 6, 727, 10.1111/gcbb.12111 NISRA, 2021 O'Brien, 2014, A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms, J. Dairy Sci., 97, 1835, 10.3168/jds.2013-7174 Ritchie, 2020 Rosenqvist, 2005, Economics of using wastewater irrigation of willow in Northern Ireland, Biomass Bioenergy, 29, 83, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.04.001 2018 Savoie, 2013, Harvest of short-rotation woody crops in plantations with a biobaler, Energy Power Eng., 05, 39, 10.4236/epe.2013.52A006 SEAI Sinnott, 1999, volume 6 Ssegane, 2016, The economics of growing shrub willow as a bioenergy buffer on agricultural fields: a case study in the Midwest Corn Belt, Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin., 6, 246 Tagliafierro, 2013, Landscape economic valuation by integrating landscape ecology into landscape economics, Environ. Sci. Policy, 32, 26, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.001 Teagasc, 2015 2023 Ulster Bank, 2021Ulster Bank. (2021). Personal communication. Zumpf, 2021, Influence of shrub willow buffers strategically integrated in an Illinois corn-soybean field on soil health and microbial community composition, Sci. Total Environ., 772, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145674