20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis

Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4601 Bateman, 2003, Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values, Land Economics, 79, 235, 10.2307/3146869 Bateman, I., Munro, A., 2005. Household vs. Individual Valuation: What's the Difference? European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, Bremen. Bijmolt, 2001, Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements, Marketing Letters, 12, 157, 10.1023/A:1011117103381 Bojö, J., 1985. Kostnadsnyttoanalys av fjällnära skogar: Fallet Vålådalen (Cost-benefit analysis of mountainous forests: the Vala Valley Case). Research Report, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics. Boman, 1995, Estimating costs and genetic benefits of various sizes of predator populations: the case of Bear, Wolf, Wolverine and Lynx in Sweden, Journal of Environmental Management, 43, 349, 10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90259-7 Bostedt, G., 1997. Public goods in Swedish forests: essays on nonmarket valuation and environmental policy. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Bostedt, G., Mattson, L., 1991. Skogens betydelse för turismen: En samhällsekonomisk pilotstudie (The importance of forests for tourism: a pilot cost-benefit analysis). Arbetsrapport 141, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. Bostedt, 1995, The value of forests for tourism in Sweden, Annals of Tourism Research, 22, 671, 10.1016/0160-7383(95)00007-S Boyle, 2003, Contingent valuation in practice Brouwer, 1999, A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies, Regional Environmental Change, 1, 47, 10.1007/s101130050007 Button, 1995, What can meta-analysis tell us about transport?, Regional Studies, 29, 507, 10.1080/00343409512331349143 Cameron, 2002, Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 391, 10.1006/jeem.2001.1210 Carson, 2004 Carson, 1996, Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods, Land Economics, 72, 80, 10.2307/3147159 Carson, 2001, Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 173, 10.1023/A:1011128332243 Desvousges, 1998 Eiswerth, 1997, Adjusting benefits transfer values for inflation, Water Resources Research, 33, 2381, 10.1029/97WR01983 Florax, 2002 Framstad, 2002, Evaluering av barskogvernet i Norge (Evaluation of the conservation of coniferous forests in Norway), NINA Fagrapport, 54 Fredman, 1995, The existence of existence value: a study of the economic benefits of an endangered species, Journal of Forest Economics, 1, 307 Fredman, 2001, Wilderness purism, willingness to pay and management preferences: a study of Swedish mountain tourists, Tourism Economics, 7, 5, 10.5367/000000001101297702 Garnes, A.S., Winther, G., 1991. Holdninger til og betalingsvillighet for flersidig skogbruk og barskogvern i Norge (Attitudes and WTO for multiple use forestry and forest preservation in Norway). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Hanemann, 1994, Valuing the environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 19, 10.1257/jep.8.4.19 Hanley, 1998, Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, 413, 10.1023/A:1008287310583 Hoen, H.F., Veisten, K., 1994. En undersøkelse blant brukere av Oslomarka: synspunkter på skogtilstand og skogbehandling (A survey of the users of Oslomarka: attitudes towards forest scenary and forestry practices). Skogforsk 6/94. Hoen, 1993, Multiple-use forestry and preservation of coniferous forests in Norway: a study of attitudes and Willingness-to-pay, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 266, 10.1080/02827589309382776 Holgen, 2000, Recreation values of boreal forest stand types and landscapes resulting from different silvicultural systems: an economic analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 60, 173, 10.1006/jema.2000.0377 Horne, 2005, Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment, Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 189, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026 Horowitz, 2003, Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and the income effect, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 537, 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00216-0 Hökby, 2003, Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden, Environmental and Resource Economics, 26, 361, 10.1023/B:EARE.0000003581.97411.75 Jakus, 2006, Temporal reliability in contingent valuation (with a restrictive research budget), 249 Johansson, 1989, Valuing public goods in a risky world: an experiment, 39 Johansson, 1989, Svenska folkets miljöbudget, Ekonomisk Debatt, 6, 472 Johansson, 1988, How is the willingness to pay for Moose hunting affected by the stock of Moose? An empirical study of Moose-hunters in the county of Västerbotten, Journal of Environmental Management, 163 Johnston, 2003, Modeling relationships between use and nonuse values for surface water quality: a meta-analysis, Water Resources Research, 39, 10.1029/2003WR002649 Johnston, 2005, Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 221, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04018.x Kahneman, 1992, Valuing public-goods – the purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S 2000 Kniivilä, M., 2004. Contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis of nature conservation: a case study in North Karelia, Finland. D.Sc. (Agriculture and Forestry) Thesis, University of Joensuu. Kniivilä, 2002, Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in Eastern Finland, Journal of Forest Economics, 8, 131, 10.1078/1104-6899-00008 Kriström, 1989, On the benefits of preserving virgin forests in Sweden, Scandinavian Forest Economics, 141 Kriström, 1990, A nonparametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies, Land Economics, 66, 135, 10.2307/3146363 Kriström, B., 1990b. Valuing environmental benefits using the contingent valuation method – an econometric analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Umeå University. Laitila, 2006, A multi-attribute extension of discrete-choice contingent valuation for valuation of angling site characteristics, Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 10.1080/00222216.2006.11950072 Lehtonen, 2003, Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland, Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 195, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00035-2 Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Li, C.-Z., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005a. Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation: the case of forest conservation in southern Finland, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Economics. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Ovaskainen, V., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005b. Influence of Logit Model Assumptions on Estimated Willingness to Pay for Forest Conservation in Southern Finland, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Economics. Leidal, K., 1996. Verdsetting av et bynært rekreasjonsområde: en betinget verdsettingsundersøkelse av området rundt Eigevannet i Kristiansand kommune (Valuation of an urban recreation area: a contingent valuation study of the Eige Lake area in Kristiansand municipality). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Li, 1996, Semiparametric estimation of the binary choice model for contingent valuation, Land Economics, 72, 462, 10.2307/3146909 Li, 1995, Discrete-choice under preference uncertainty – an improved structural model for contingent valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 256, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1017 Li, 2004, Using choice experiments to value the Natura 2000 Nature conservation programs in Finland, Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 361, 10.1007/s10640-004-9455-4 List, 2001, What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 241, 10.1023/A:1012791822804 Loomis, 1996, Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 18, 197, 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8 Mattsson, 1993, The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests – an economic-analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426, 10.1080/02827589309382789 Mattsson, 1994, How do different forest management-practices affect the non-timber value of forests – an economic-analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 41, 79, 10.1006/jema.1994.1035 Mitchell, R.C., Carson, R.T., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Murphy, 2005, A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, 313, 10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z Mäntymaa, E., Mönkkönen, M., Siikamäki, J., Svento, R., 2002. Estimating the demand for biodiversity – vagueness band and open-ended questions. In: van Ierland, E.C., Weikard, H.P., Wesseler, J. (Eds.), Proceedings: Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics. Navrud, 1992 2006 Olsson, C., 1993. Linbanan i Norsjö – En skogsinriktad turistattraktion. En undersökning av betalningsvilja för att uppleva skog och natur (The cable car in Norsjö – a forest based tourist attraction). Master, Handelshögskolan i Umeå. Ovaskainen, 2005, Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49, 379, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2005.00309.x Pattanayak, S.K., Wing, J.M., Depro, B.M., van Houtven, G., de Civita, P., Stieb, D.M., Hubbel, B., 2002. International Health Benefits Transfer Application Tool: The Use of PPP and inflation indices. Prepared for Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division, Health Canada. Pouta, E., 2003. Attitude-behavior framework in contingent valuation of forest conservation. Ph.D., University of Helsinki. Pouta, 2004, Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 229, 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00170-8 Pouta, 2005, Sensitivity to scope of environmental regulation in contingent valuation of forest cutting practices in Finland, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 539, 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.002 Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005. Meta analysis of forest valuation studies. Working paper (In Finnish). Pouta, 2000, Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland, Forestry, 73, 119, 10.1093/forestry/73.2.119 Pouta, 2002, Willingness to pay in different policy-planning methods: insights into respondents’ decision-making processes, Ecological Economics, 40, 295, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00274-9 Quiggin, 1998, Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 58, 10.2307/3180268 Rabin, 1998, Psychology and Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVI, 11 Rekola, 2005, Public preferences for uncertain regeneration cuttings: a contingent valuation experiment involving Finnish private forests, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 635, 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.003 Rekola, 2000, Incommensurable preferences in contingent valuation: the case of Natura 2000 Network in Finland, Environmental Conservation, 27, 260, 10.1017/S0376892900000291 Rosenberger, 2000, Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: in-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database, Water Resources Research, 36, 1097, 10.1029/2000WR900006 Rosenberger, 2000, Panel stratification in meta-analysis of economic studies: an investigation of its effects in the recreation valuation literature, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32, 131 Sandsbråten, L., 1997. Verdsetting av miljøgoder i Oslomarka: en betinget verdsettingsundersøkelse i privat og kommunal skog i Indre Oslomarka (Valuation of environmental goods in Oslomarka: a contingent valuation survey of private and municipality owned forest in inner Oslomarka). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Sayman, 2005, Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA–WTP disparity: a meta analytical framework, Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 289, 10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.002 Schläpfer, 2006, Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 57, 415, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.019 Shrestha, 2001, Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation, Ecological Economics, 39, 67, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00193-8 Shrestha, 2003, Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity, Environmental & Resource Economics, 25, 79, 10.1023/A:1023658501572 Siikamäki, J., Layton, D., in press. Discrete choice survey experiments: a comparison using flexible methods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, forthcoming. Simensen, K., Wind, M., 1990. Holdninger til og betalingsvillighet for ulike skogbehandlinger i fjellskog: En empirisk undersøkelse av hirkjølen statsallmenning (attitudes and wtp for different forestry practices in mountainous forests: a survey of the hirkjolen common). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Skagestad, E., 1996. Friluftsliv og Skogbruk – En spørreundersøkelse blant turgjengere i ytre Oslomarka, Romeriksåsen, på vinterstid (Recreation and forestry – a survey of hikers in the outer Oslomarka, Romeriksåsen, in the winter time). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Smith, 1990, Signals or noise – explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 419, 10.2307/1242344 Smith, 1996, Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ‘‘scope’’ test? A meta-analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0045 Smith, 2002, Is meta-analysis a Noah's Ark for non-market valuation?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 271, 10.1023/A:1015567316109 Stanley, 2001, Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 131, 10.1257/jep.15.3.131 Stanley, 2005, Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys, Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 299, 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00249.x Strand, 2005, Individual and household values of mortality reductions with intrahousehold bargaining, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31, 217, 10.1007/s11166-005-3555-6 Strand, J., Wahl, T.S., 1997. Verdsetting av kommunale friområder i Oslo: en betinget verdsettingsstudie (Valuation of Municipality Recreation Areas in Oslo: A Contingent Valuation Study). SNF Report 82/97. Sundberg, S., Söderqvist, T., 2004. The economic value of environmental change in Sweden: a survey of studies. Report 5360, Naturvårdsverket. Tyrväinen, 2001, Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland, Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 75, 10.1006/jema.2001.0421 Tyrväinen, 1998, The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method, Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, 105, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00103-0 Vatn, A., Framstad, E., Solberg, B., 2005. Tiltak og virkemidler for vern av biodiversitet i skog og våtmarker. Rapport TemaNord 2005, Nordisk Ministerråd, København. Veisten, K., 1993. Samfunnsøkonomisk verdsetting av å oppretthalde artsmangfaldet i norske skogar: med testing for feilkilder ved betinga verdsetting (Social valuation of the preserving biodiversity in Norwegian forests: with multiple bias testing). Master Thesis, University of Oslo. Veisten, K., Hoen, H.F., 1994. Om haldningar til – og betalingsvilje for endringar i skogbehandlinga i Noreg: resultat frå to nasjonale undersøkingar (On attitudes and WTP for changes in forest practices in Norway: results from two national surveys). Skogforsk 4/94, Skogforsk. Veisten, 2006, Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats, Applied Economics, 38, 735, 10.1080/00036840500400152 Veisten, K., Hoen, H.F., Navrud, S., Strand, J., 1993. Valuing biodiversity in Norwegian forests: a contingent valuation study with multiple bias testing. Memo No. 7, Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Veisten, 2004, Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities, Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 317, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.008 Veisten, 2004, Sequencing and the adding-up property in contingent valuation of endangered species: are contingent non-use values economic values?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 419, 10.1007/s10640-004-9458-1 Walsh, 1989, Issues in non-market valuation and policy application: a retrospective glance, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1, 178 Walsh, 1990, Nonmarket values from two decades of research on recreation demand, vol. 5, 167 Woodward, 2001, The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 37, 257, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7