Social determinants of facial displays
Tóm tắt
A primary function of facial displays is to communicate messages to others. Bavelas and Chovil (1990) proposed an Integrated Message Model of language in which nonverbal acts such as facial displays and gestures that occur in communicative (particularly face-to-face) interactions are viewed as symbolic messages that are used to convey meaning to others. One proposition of this model is that these nonverbal messages will be shaped by the social components of the situation. The present study attempted to delineate more precisely the components of sociality that explicitly affect the use of facial displays in social situations. Frequency of motor mimicry displays in response to hearing about a close-call experience was examined in four communicative situations. In one condition, participants listened to a tape-recording of an individual telling about a close-call event. In two interactive but nonvisual conditions, participants listened to another person over the telephone or in the same room but separated by a partition. In the fourth condition, participants listened to another person in a face-to-face interaction. The frequency of listeners' motor mimicry displays was found to vary monotonically with the sociality of the four conditions. Actual presence and visual availability of the story-teller potentiated listener displays. The results support the proposition that facial displays are mediated by the extent to which individuals can fully interact in communicative situations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., MacInnis, S., & Mullett, J. (1986a). Experimental methods for studying “elementary motor mimicry”.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10 102–119.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986b). “I show how you feel.” Motor mimicry as a communicative act.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 322–329.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1987). Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. In N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (Eds.),Empathy and its development (pp. 317–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (1990).So you think language is verbal? An integrated message model of verbal and nonverbal communication. Manuscript in preparation.
Brightman, V., Segal, A., Werther, P., & Steiner, J. (1975). Ethological study of facial expression in response to taste stimuli.Journal of Dental Research, 54, L141.
Chovil, N. (1989)Communicative functions of facial displays in conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Darwin, C. (1965).The expression of emotion in man and animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Originally published 1872)
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 19 (pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969a). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32 88–105.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969b). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior—Categories, origins, usage, and coding.Semiotica, 1 49–98.
Ekman, P. (Ed.), (1982).Emotion in the human face (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emde, R. N. (1984). Levels of meaning for infant emotions: A bisocial view. In In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 129–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Emde, R. N., Gaensbauer, T. J., & Harmon, R. J. (1976).Emotional expression in infancy. New York: International Universities Press.
Fridlund, A. J. (in press). Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage.Biological Psychology.
Fridlund, A. J. (1991). The sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 229–240.
Fridlund, A. J., Sabini, J. P., Hedlund, L. E., Schaut, J. A., Shenker, J. I., & Knauer, M. J. (1990). Audience effects on solitary faces during imagery: Displaying to the people in your head.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14 113–137.
Fridlund, A. J., Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1987). Facial expressions of emotion: Review of literature, 1970–1983. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication (2nd ed., pp. 143–224). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoffman, M. L. (1982). The measurement of empathy. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in infants and children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Izard, C. E. (1971).The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kleck, R. E., Vaughan, R. C., Cartwright-Smith, J., Vaughan, K. B., Colby, C. Z., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1976). Effects of being observed on expressive, subjective, and physiological responses to painful stimuli.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 1211–1218.
Kraut, R. E., & Johnson, R. E. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 853–863.
Malatesta, C. Z. (1985). Human infant: Emotional expression development. In G. Zivin (Ed.),The development of expressive behavior (pp. 183–219). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy.Journal of Personality, 40 525–543.
Solano, C. H. (1989).The state of social psychology: Issues, themes, and controversies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sorce, J., & Emde, R. N. (1981). Mother's presence is not enough: Effect of emotional availability on infant exploration.Developmental Psychology, 17 737–745.
Tomkins, S. (1982). Affect theory. In P. Ekman (Ed.),Emotion in the human face (pp. 353–395). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevarthen, C. (1984). Emotions in infancy: Regulators of contact and relationships with persons. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 129–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.