AnMBR as alternative to conventional CSTR to achieve efficient methane production from thermal hydrolyzed sludge at short HRTs
Tài liệu tham khảo
Jin, 2017, Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of energy recovery from sewage sludge through different anaerobic digestion pathways, Energy, 126, 649, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.068
Appels, 2008, Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge, Prog. Energ. Combust, 4, 755, 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
Cao, 2012, Sewage sludge to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: brief overview and energy efficiency assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 1657, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.014
Xue, 2015, Effects of thermal hydrolysis on organic matter solubilization and anaerobic digestion of high solid sludge, Chem Eng J, 264, 174, 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.005
Brooks, 1968, Heat treatment of activated sludge, Water Pollut Control, 592
Machenbach, 2000, Enhanced stabilization of sewage sludge through thermal hydrolysis – three years of experience with full scale plant, Water Sci Technol, 42, 89, 10.2166/wst.2000.0178
Skouteris, 2012, Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: a review, Chem Eng J, 198–199, 138, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.070
Mei, 2016, Recover energy from domestic wastewater using anaerobic membrane bioreactor: operating parameters optimization and energy balance analysis, Energy, 98, 146, 10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.011
Yurtsever, 2017, Impact of SRT on the efficiency and microbial community of sequential anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of textile industry wastewater, Chem Eng J, 314, 378, 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.156
Xia, 2016, An enhanced anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating bamboo industry wastewater by bamboo charcoal addition: performance and microbial community analysis, Bioresour Technol, 220, 26, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.057
Chang, 2014, Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for waste water treatment, Adv Chem Eng Sci, 4, 56, 10.4236/aces.2014.41008
Qiao, 2013, Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds with and without waste activated sludge as co-substrate using a submerged AnMBR: system amendments and membrane performance, Bioresour Technol, 150, 249, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.002
Ng, 2015, Evaluation of system performance and microbial communities of a bioaugmented anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating pharmaceutical wastewater, Water Res, 81, 311, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.033
Lee, 2011, Effects of solids retention time on methanogenesis in anaerobic digestion of thickened mixed sludge, Bioresour Technol, 102, 10266, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.079
Kim, 2013, Absolute dominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in full-scale anaerobic sewage sludge digesters, J Environ Sci, 25, 2272, 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60299-X
Fitamo, 2017, Microbial population dynamics in urban organic waste anaerobic co-digestion with mixed sludge during a change in feedstock composition and different hydraulic retention times, Water Res, 118, 261, 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.012
Karakashev, 2006, Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of methanosaetaceae, Appl Environ Microbiol, 72, 5138, 10.1128/AEM.00489-06
Qiao, 2013, Pilot-scale experiment on thermally hydrolyzed sludge liquor anaerobic digestion using a mesophilic expanded granular sludge bed reactor, Water Sci Technol, 68, 948, 10.2166/wst.2013.333
APHA, 1995
Ahring, 1995, Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors, Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 67, 91, 10.1007/BF00872197
Hutnan, 1999, Methanogenic and non-methanogenic activity of granulated sludge in anaerobic baffled reactor, Chem Paper, 53, 374
Magoc, 2011, FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies, J. Bioinformactics, 27, 2957, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507
Caporaso, 2010, QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data, J. Nature Methods, 7, 335, 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Wang, 2007, Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy, Appl Environ Microbiol, 73, 5261, 10.1128/AEM.00062-07
Pérez-Elvira, 2012, Continuous thermal hydrolysis and anaerobic digestion of sludge. Energy integration study, Water Sci Technol, 65, 1839, 10.2166/wst.2012.863
Ren, 2018, Continuous energy recovery and nutrients removal from molasses wastewater by synergistic system of dark fermentation and algal culture under various fermentation types, Bioresour Technol, 252, 110, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.092
Ren, 2018, Favorable energy conversion efficiency of coupling dark fermentation and microalgae production from food wastes, Energ. Cconvers. Manag, 166, 156, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.032
Ahring, 1995, Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digesters, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 43, 559, 10.1007/BF00218466
Algapani, 2018, Long-term bio-H2 and bio-CH4 production from food waste in a continuous two-stage system: energy efficiency and conversion pathways, Bioresour Technol, 248, 204, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.164
Mulat, 2014, Quantifying contribution of synthrophic acetate oxidation to methane production in thermophilic anaerobic reactors by membrane inlet mass spectrometry, Environ Sci Technol, 48, 2505
Westerholm, 2016, Biogas production through syntrophic acetate oxidation and deliberate operating strategies for improved digester performance, Appl Energy, 179, 124, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.061
Isa, 1993, Methanogenic activity test for study of anaerobic processes, Indian J. Enviorn. Hlth, 35, 1
Effebi, 2011, Acidogenic and methanogenic activities in anaerobic ponds, J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2, 2229
Soto, 1993, Methanogenic and non methanogenic activity tests theoretical basis and experimental set up, Water Res, 27, 1361, 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90224-6
Lerm, 2012, Archaeal community composition affects the function of anaerobic codigesters in response to organic overload, Waste Manag, 32, 389, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.013
Dohanyos, 2004, Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sludge, Water Sci Technol, 49, 89, 10.2166/wst.2004.0616
Ersahin, 2016, Gas-lift anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactors for high strength synthetic wastewater treatment: effect of biogas sparging velocity and HRT on treatment performance, Chem Eng J, 305, 46, 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.003