Mixing effect on volume growth of Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris is modulated by stand density

Forest Ecology and Management - Tập 292 - Trang 86-95 - 2013
Sonia Condés1, Miren Del Rio2,3, Hubert Sterba4
1Dept. Economía y Gestión Forestal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2Dept. Selvicultura y Gestión de Sistemas Forestales INIA-CIFOR, Ctra. A Coruña, km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute UVa-INIA, Spain
4Dept. of Forest and Soil Sciences, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter Jordanstrasse 82, Vienna, Austria

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amoroso, 2006, Comparing productivity of pure and mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantations in the Pacific Northwest, Can. J. For. Res., 36, 1484, 10.1139/x06-042 Assmann, 1970 Bartelink, 2000, A growth model for mixed forest stands, For. Ecol. Manage., 134, 29, 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00243-1 Belote, 2011, Forest productivity and tree diversity relationships depend on ecological context within mid-Atlantic and Appalachian forests, For. Ecol. Manage., 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.010 Bristow, 2006, Improving productivity in mixed-species plantations, For. Ecol. Manage., 233, 193, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.010 Brown, 1992 Callaway, 1997, Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities, Ecology, 78, 1958, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:CAFASA]2.0.CO;2 Cannell, 1992 Cavard, 2011, Importance of mixedwoods for biodiversity conservation: evidence for understory plants, songbirds, soil fauna, and ectomycorrhizae in northern forests, Environ. Rev., 19, 142, 10.1139/a11-004 Erskine, 2005, Growth performance and management of a mixed rainforest tree plantation, New Forests, 29, 117, 10.1007/s11056-005-0250-z Forrester, 2004, Growth dynamics in a mixed-species plantation of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii, For. Ecol. Manage., 193, 81, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.024 Garber, 2004, Stand productivity and development in two mixed-species spacing trials in the central Oregon Cascades, For. Sci., 50, 92 Goulding, 1972 Griess, 2011, Growth performance, windthrow, and insects: meta-analyzes of parameters influencing performance of mixed-species stands in boreal and northern temperate biomes, Can. J. For. Res., 41, 1141, 10.1139/x11-042 Hébert, 2005, Estimation de l’accroissement et de la production forestière à l’aide de placettes permanentes concentriques, Ann. For. Sci., 62, 229, 10.1051/forest:2005014 Holmgren, 1997, The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities, Ecology, 78, 1966, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1966:TIOFAC]2.0.CO;2 Huang, 1993, An index of site productivity for uneven-aged or mixed-species stands, Can. J. For. Res., 23, 558, 10.1139/x93-074 Jogiste, 2000, A basal area increment model for Norway spruce in mixed stands in Estonia, Scand. J. For. Res., 15, 97, 10.1080/02827580050160529 Kelty, M.J., 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty M.J., L.B.C., Oliver C.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (The Netherlands), pp. 125–41. Kelty, 2006, The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry, For. Ecol. Manage., 233, 195, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011 Kelty, 1995, Plot designs for the analysis of species interactions in mixed stands, Commonw. For. Rev., 74, 322 Kira, 1953, Intraspecific competition among higher plants. I. Competition–yield–density interrelationship in regularly dispersed populations, J. Inst. Polytechn., Osaka City Univ., Ser. D, 4, 1 Meier, E.S., Edwards Jr., T.C., Kienast, F., Dobbertin, M., Zimmermann, N.E., 2011. Cooccurrence patterns of trees along macroclimatic gradients and their potential influence on the present and future distribution of Fagus sylvatica L.J. Biogeogr. Milios, 2004, The influence of stand development process on the height and volume growth of dominant Fagus sylvatica L. sl trees in the central Rhodope Mountains of north-eastern Greece, Forestry, 77, 17, 10.1093/forestry/77.1.17 MMA, 2002 Navarra, 2000 Perot, 2012, Mixture enhances productivity in a two-species forest: evidence from a modeling approach, Ecol. Res., 27, 83, 10.1007/s11284-011-0873-9 Porté, 2002, Modeling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management, Ecol. Model., 150, 141, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00476-8 Pretzsch, H., 1999. Modeling growth in pure and mixed stands: a historical overview. In: Olsthoorn, A.F.M., Bartelink, H.H., Gardiner, J.J., Pretzsch, H., Hekhuis, H.J., Franc, A. (Ed.), Management of Mixed-species Forest: Silviculture and Economics. Vol. 15. DLO Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. IBN Sci. Contrib. pp. 102–107. Pretzsch, 2005, A re-evaluation of Reineke’s rule and stand density index, For. Sci., 51, 304 Pretzsch, 2010, Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient, Ann. For. Sci., 67, 1, 10.1051/forest/2010037 Pretzsch, H., Dieler, J., Seifert, T., Rötzer, T., 2012. Climate effects on productivity and resource-use efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in stands with different spatial mixing patterns. Trees-Struct. Funct., 1–18. Pretzsch, 2009, Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level, Eur. J. For. Res., 128, 183, 10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9 Prodan, 1959, Umrechnung von Massen in Flächenanteile, Forstarchiv, 30, 110 R, D.C.T., 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Reineke, 1933, Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests, J. Agric. Res., 46, 627 Río, 2001, Analysis of diameter–density relationships and self-thinning in non-thinned even-aged Scots pine stands, For. Ecol. Manage., 142, 79, 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00341-8 Río, 2009, Comparing volume growth in pure and mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica, Ann. For. Sci., 66, 502, 10.1051/forest/2009035 Rothe, 2001, Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis, Can. J. For. Res., 31, 1855, 10.1139/x01-120 Ruiz de la Torre, 1979, Arboles y arbustos de la España peninsular, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes Scherer-Lorenzen, 2005 Sterba, 1987, Estimating potential density from thinning experiments and inventory data, For. Sci., 33, 1022 Sterba, 1998, The precision of species proportion by area when estimated by angle counts and yield tables, Forestry, 71, 25, 10.1093/forestry/71.1.25 Tilman, 1988 Vallet, 2011, Silver fir stand productivity is enhanced when mixed with Norway spruce. evidence based on large scale inventory data and a generic modeling approach, J. Veg. Sci., 22, 932, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01288.x Vanclay, 1988, Assessing site productivity of indigenous cypress pine forest in southern Queensland, Commonw. Forest Rev., 67, 53 Vilà, 2005, Confounding factors in the observational productivity–diversity relationship in forests, Forest Divers. Funct., 65, 10.1007/3-540-26599-6_4 Vila, 2007, Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests, Ecol. Lett., 10, 241, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01016.x