Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE

Casari, M., Ham, J., & Kagel, J. (2007). Selection bias, demographic effects and ability effects in common value auctions experiments. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1278–1304.

Cleave, B., Nikiforakis, N., & Slonim, R. (2013). Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. Experimental Economics, 16(3), 372–382.

Coutts, L. M., & Schneider, F. W. (1975). Recruitment of experimental subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 142.

Dixon, P. N. (1978). Subject recruitment incentives, personality factors, and attitudes towards experimentation in a simultaneous intentional-incidential learning task. Journal of General Psychology, 99, 99–105.

Falk, A., Meier, S., & Zehnder, C. (2013). Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(4), 839–852.

Harrison, G., Lau, M., & Rutström, E. (2009). Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70, 498–507.

Jackson, J. M., Procidano, M. E., & Cohen, C. J. (1989). Subject pool sign-up procedures: a threat to external validity. Social Behavior and Personality, 17, 29–43.

Jung, J. (1969). Current practices and problems in the use of college students for psychological research. The Canadian Psychologist, 10, 280–290.

Krawczyk, M. (2011). What brings subjects to the lab? Experimental Economics, 14(4), 482–489.

Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Rush, M. C., Phillips, J. S., & Panek, P. E. (1978). Subject recruitment bias: the paid volunteer subject. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 443–449.

Saunders, D. M., Fisher, W. A., Hewitt, E. C., & Clayton, J. P. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: recruitment procedures and responses to erotica. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1703–1712.

Senn, C. Y., & Desmarais, S. (2001). Are our recruitment practices for sex studies working across gender? The effect of topic and gender of recruiter on participation rates of university men and women. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 111–117.

Silverman, I., & Margulis, S. (1973). Experiment title as a source of sampling bias in commonly used ‘subject pool’ procedures. The Canadian Psychologist, 14, 197–201.

Slonim, R., Wang, C., Garbarino, E., & Merrett, D. (2013). Opting-in: participation bias in economic experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 90, 43–70.

Wagner, M. E., & Schubert, D. S. P. (1976). Increasing volunteer representativeness by recruiting for credit or pay. The Journal of General Psychology, 94, 85–91.