Recommendations for the analysis of individually randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm – a case of continuous outcomes
Tóm tắt
In an individually randomised controlled trial where the treatment is delivered by a health professional it seems likely that the effectiveness of the treatment, independent of any treatment effect, could depend on the skill, training or even enthusiasm of the health professional delivering it. This may then lead to a potential clustering of the outcomes for patients treated by the same health professional, but similar clustering may not occur in the control arm. Using four case studies, we aim to provide practical guidance and recommendations for the analysis of trials with some element of clustering in one arm. Five approaches to the analysis of outcomes from an individually randomised controlled trial with clustering in one arm are identified in the literature. Some of these methods are applied to four case studies of completed randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm with sample sizes ranging from 56 to 539. Results are obtained using the statistical packages R and Stata and summarised using a forest plot. The intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) for each of the case studies was small (<0.05) indicating little dependence on the outcomes related to cluster allocations. All models fitted produced similar results, including the simplest approach of ignoring clustering for the case studies considered. A partially clustered approach, modelling the clustering in just one arm, most accurately represents the trial design and provides valid results. Modelling homogeneous variances between the clustered and unclustered arm is adequate in scenarios similar to the case studies considered. We recommend treating each participant in the unclustered arm as a single cluster. This approach is simple to implement in R and Stata and is recommended for the analysis of trials with clustering in one arm only. However, the case studies considered had small ICC values, limiting the generalisability of these results.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Walters SJ. Therapist effects in randomised controlled trials: what to do about them. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19:1102–1112.
Campbell MJ, Walters SJ. How to Design, Analyses and Report Cluster Randomised Trials in Medicine and Health Related Research. West Sussex: Statistics in Practice, Wiley; 2014.
Campbell MJ, Machin D, Walters SJ. Medical Statistics. A Textbook for the Health Sciences, 4th Edition. Chester: Wiley; 2007.
Baldwin SA, Stice E, Rohde P. Statistical analysis of group-administered intervention data: Reanalysis of two randomized trials. Psychother Res. 2008; 18(4):365–76.
Baldwin SA, Bauer DJ. Evaluating models for partially clustered designs. Psychol Methods. 2011; 16:149–65.
Weatherley-Jones E, Nicholl JP, Thomas KJ, Parry GJ, McKendrick MW, Green ST, Stanley PJ, Lynch SPJ. A randomised,controlled, triple-blind trial of the efficacy of homeopathic treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2004; 56:189–97.
Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Thorpe L, Brazier J, Fitter M, Campbell MJ, Roman M, Walters SJ, Nicholl J. Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain. BMJ. 2006; 333:623.
Bauer DJ, Sterba SK, Hallfors DD. Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivar Behav Res. 2008; 43:210–36.
Bland M. Grouping in individually randomised trials. In: 4th Annual Conference on Randomised Controlled Trials in the Social Sciences, September 2009. York, UK: 2009. https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/talks/. Accessed 31 Oct 2016.
Heo M, Litwin AH, Blackstock O, Kim N, Arnsten JH. Sample size determinations for group-based randomized clinical trials with different levels of data hierarchy between experimental and control arms. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014; 0:1–15.
Galbraith S, Daniel JA, Vissel B. A study of clustered data and approaches to its analysis. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(32):10601–10608.
Faes MC, Reelick MF, Perry M, Rikkert MGO, Borm GF. Studies with group treatments required special power calculations, allocation methods, and statistical analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(2):138–46.
Moerbeek M, Wong WK. Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model. Stat Med. 2008; 27:2850–864.
Roberts C. Session 3: Design and analysis of trials of therapist treatments. In: BABCP 2010, 38th Annual Conference and Workshops: 2010. Available online at http://slideplayer.com/slide/6195114/. Accessed 31 Oct 2016.
Morrell CJ, Walters SJ, Dixon S, Collins KA, Brereton LML, Peters J, Brooker CGD. Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998; 316:1487–1497.
Morrell CJ, Spiby H, Stewart P, Walters S, Morgan A. Costs and effectiveness of community postnatal support workers: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000; 321:593–8.
Gail M, Hind D, Gossage-Worrall R, Walters S, Duncan R, Newbould L, Rex S, Jones C, Bowling A, Cattan M, Cairns A, Cooper C, Edwards R, Goyder E. ’Putting Life in Years’ (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014; 15(1):141.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
Kahan BC, Forbes G, Ali Y, Jairath V, Bremner S, Harhay MO, Hooper R, Wright N, Eldridge SM, Leyrat C. Increased risk of type i errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study. Trials. 2016; 17(1):438.
Satterthwaite FE. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biom Bull. 1946; 2(6):110–4.
Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997; 53(3):983–997.
StataCorp. Stata: Release 14. statistical software. 2015. http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/citing-software-documentation-faqs/.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015; 67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. 2015. R package version 3.1-121. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 31 Oct 2016.
Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS.Springer Science & Business Media. 2006.
Cook JA, Bruckner T, MacLennan GS, Seiler CM. Clustering in surgical trials-database of intracluster correlations. Trials. 2012; 13(1):1.
Browne WJ, Goldstein H, Rasbash J. Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Stat Model. 2001; 1(2):103–24.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473–83.