Loss of NFAT5 results in renal atrophy and lack of tonicity-responsive gene expression

Cristina López-Rodrı́guez1, Christopher L. Antos1,2, John M. Shelton1, James A. Richardson1, Fangming Lin1, Tatiana I. Novobrantseva1, Roderick T. Bronson1, Peter Igarashi1, Anjana Rao1, Eric N. Olson1
1Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and Center for Blood Research, Institute for Biomedical Research, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston MA 02115; Departments of Molecular Biology, Pathology, Internal Medicine (Nephrology), and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9148; and Department of Pathology, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA 01536
2Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology

Tóm tắt

The transcription factor NFAT5/TonEBP, a member of the NFAT/Rel family of transcription factors, has been implicated in diverse cellular responses, including the response to osmotic stress, integrin-dependent cell migration, T cell activation, and the Ras pathway in Drosophila . To clarify the in vivo role of NFAT5, we generated NFAT5-null mice. Homozygous mutants were genetically underrepresented after embryonic day 14.5. Surviving mice manifested a progressive and profound atrophy of the kidney medulla with impaired activation of several osmoprotective genes, including those encoding aldose reductase, Na + /Cl -coupled betaine/γ-aminobutyric acid transporter, and the Na + /myo-inositol cotransporter. The aldose reductase gene is controlled by a tonicity-responsive enhancer, which was refractory to hypertonic stress in fibroblasts lacking NFAT5, establishing this enhancer as a direct transcriptional target of NFAT5. Our findings demonstrate a central role for NFAT5 as a tonicity-responsive transcription factor required for kidney homeostasis and function.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.437

10.1042/bj3130697

10.1016/0955-0674(95)80002-6

Guyton A. C. & Hall J. E. (1996) in Textbook of Medical Physiology (Saunders Philadelphia) pp. 349–366.

10.1073/pnas.96.13.7214

10.1073/pnas.101602398

10.1101/sqb.1999.64.517

10.1038/nsb749

10.1073/pnas.96.5.2538

10.1007/s00424-002-0849-2

10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00165-0

10.1681/ASN.V12112221

10.4049/jimmunol.165.9.4884

10.1038/ncb816

10.1093/genetics/156.3.1219

10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00984.x

10.1016/S0022-2275(20)32400-7

Conner D. A. (2000) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology eds. Ausubel F. M. Brent R. Kingston R. E. Moore D. D. Seidman J. Smith J. A. & Struhl K. (Wiley Hoboken N.J.) pp. 23.2.1–23.2.7.

10.1074/jbc.272.26.16431

Michea, L., Ferguson, D. R., Peters, E. M., Andrews, P. M., Kirby, M. R. & Burg, M. B. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 278, F209–F218.

10.1038/362065a0

10.1074/jbc.M008216200

10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00747.x

10.1006/bbrc.2000.3648