Off-pump Revascularization with Bilateral versus Single Mammary Arteries—A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon - Tập 68 Số 08 - Trang 687-694 - 2020
Thomas Puehler1, Armin Zittermann2, Mohamad Dia3, Eric Emmel2, Mustafa Gerçek3, Jochen Börgermann3, Kavous Hakim‐Meibodi2, Jan Gummert2
1Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
2Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
3Herzzentrum Duisburg, Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Coronary artery bypass grafting is the first-line therapy for severe multivessel coronary artery disease. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcome in patients undergoing isolated off-pump surgery with the single or bilateral internal mammary artery (SIMA or BIMA) approach. Methods We performed a propensity score-matched analysis in 1,852 consecutive patients, aged 50 to 70 years, who underwent myocardial revascularization at our institution between July 2009 and August 2016. Primary end point was the probability of survival. Results Mean follow-up was 36.3 (range: 0.1–89.6) months. The probability of survival in the SIMA and BIMA groups was 98.6 and 99.0% at year 1, 92.0 and 92.5% at year 5, and 85.6 and 81.6% at year 7, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of mortality for the BIMA group versus the SIMA group of 0.98 (95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.64–1.52; p = 0.94). There was evidence for interaction between diabetes and study group on mortality risk (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.07–6.23; p = 0.034). Freedom from mediastinitis/wound infection was higher in the SIMA group than in the BIMA group (99.5 and 96.9%, respectively; HR of an event = 6.39, 95% CI: 2.88–14.18; p < 0.001). The corresponding values in the subgroups of diabetic patients were 98.6 and 90.9%, respectively (HR = 6.45, 95% CI: 2.24–18.58; p = 0.001). Mediastinitis/wound infection was associated with increased mortality risk (HR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.29–6.78; p = 0.010). Conclusion Overall, our data indicate similar probability of survival up to a maximum follow-up of 7 years by off-pump surgery with the SIMA or BIMA approach. However, in diabetic patients, the clinical outcome indicates caution regarding the use of the BIMA approach.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

S Windecker, 2014, 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Eur Heart J, 35, 2541, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278

A J Epstein, 2011, Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008, JAMA, 305, 1769, 10.1001/jama.2011.551

T Palmerini, 2017, Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients, Am Heart J, 190, 54, 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005

A M Calafiore, 2004, Late results of first myocardial revascularization in multiple vessel disease: single versus bilateral internal mammary artery with or without saphenous vein grafts, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 26, 542, 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.028

F D Loop, 1998, Coronary artery surgery: the end of the beginning, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 14, 554, 10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00249-8

M Di Mauro, 2015, Bilateral internal mammary artery for multi-territory myocardial revascularization: long-term follow-up of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 47, 698, 10.1093/ejcts/ezu247

S N Buttar, 2017, Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis, Heart, 103, 1419, 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310864

S Srivastava, 2006, Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients, Ann Thorac Surg, 81, 800, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.044

G Yi, 2014, Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach, Circulation, 130, 539, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255

D P Taggart, 2015, Effects of on-pump and off-pump surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Trial, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 47, 1059, 10.1093/ejcts/ezu349

S V Deo, 2015, Are two really always better than one? Results, concerns and controversies in the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Surg, 16, 163, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.008

M Y Emmert, 2012, Total arterial off-pump surgery provides excellent outcomes and does not compromise complete revascularization, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 41, e25, 10.1093/ejcts/ezr225

S Raza, 2014, Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 148, 1257, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.058

C Dai, 2013, Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and risk of sternal wound infection: evidence from observational studies, Ann Thorac Surg, 95, 1938, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.12.038

D Navia, 2014, Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 147, 632, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.012

S V Deo, 2013, Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients, Ann Thorac Surg, 95, 862, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.068

J Börgermann, 2012, Clampless off-pump versus conventional coronary artery revascularization: a propensity score analysis of 788 patients, Circulation, 126, S176, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084285

U Fuchs, 2005, Clinical outcome of patients with deep sternal wound infection managed by vacuum-assisted closure compared to conventional therapy with open packing: a retrospective analysis, Ann Thorac Surg, 79, 526, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.032

D P Taggart, 2010, Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART), Eur Heart J, 31, 2470, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318

D P Taggart, 2016, Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts, N Engl J Med, 375, 2540, 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021

J P DeSimone, 2018, Coronary revascularization with single versus bilateral mammary arteries: is it time to change?, Ann Thorac Surg, 106, 466, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.089

C Locker, 2012, Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease, Circulation, 126, 1023, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624

A Iribarne, 2018, Should diabetes be a contraindication to bilateral internal mammary artery grafting?, Ann Thorac Surg, 105, 709, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.054

M P Sá, 2015, Skeletonized versus pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: outcomes and concerns analyzed through a meta-analytical approach, Int J Surg, 16, 146, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.019

U Benedetto, 2016, Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 152, 270, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.056

S G Raja, 2015, Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in diabetics: outcomes, concerns and controversies, Int J Surg, 16, 153, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.004

E T Martin, 2016, Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 37, 88, 10.1017/ice.2015.249

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Tập 68 Số 08

687-694

Thông tin tác giả