Incidence of reoperation and wound dehiscence in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocations: comparison between osteotomy versus soft tissue procedures

Wiley - Tập 26 - Trang 897-902 - 2016
Youichi Yasui1,2, Khushdeep S. Vig1,3, Ichiro Tonogai1,4, Chun Wai Hung1,5, Christopher D. Murawski1,6, Masato Takao2, Hirotaka Kawano2, John G. Kennedy1
1Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
3Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
5New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA
6University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA

Tóm tắt

There is a lack of substantial clinical evidence endorsing the clinical outcomes of osteotomy for peroneal tendon dislocations. The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative reoperation rates following osteotomy techniques and soft tissues procedures using large database in order to investigate the efficacy of bony techniques. Patients who underwent osteotomy and soft tissue procedures for peroneal tendon dislocations were identified and subsequently analysed using the United Healthcare Orthopedic and the Medicare datasets (PearlDiver Patient Record Database, PearlDiver Technologies Inc., Fort Wayne, IN). The investigated period was from 2005 to 2012. The annual incidence, gender distribution, and incidences of reoperation and wound dehiscence following primary operative procedures were determined in these cohorts. Of 6122 patients who received operative treatment for peroneal tendon dislocations, 1416 patients (23.1%) received the osteotomy technique, while 4706 (76.9%) were treated with the soft tissue techniques. The incidence of these operative procedures did not change significantly over the time periods of each database. In both databases, reoperation rates were 2.8% (40/1416) for osteotomy patients and 3.4% (158/4706) for soft tissue repair patients, with no statistical difference (2.8 vs. 3.4%. odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6–1.2, [n.s.]) between them. Based on both databases, wound dehiscence occurred in 2.6% (37/1416) of the osteotomy patients and 2.3% (110/4706) of soft tissue repair patients with no statistical difference (2.6 vs. 2.3%, odds ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.6, [n.s.]) between the groups. The results of this study show that osteotomy techniques were frequently performed for patients with peroneal tendon dislocations. Nevertheless, osteotomy techniques for peroneal tendon dislocations are not associated with a lower risk of reoperation. In conclusion, soft tissue procedures offer a satisfactory method of treating peroneal tendon dislocations without any additional risk of reoperation when compared to osteotomy techniques that have potentially greater complication rates. III.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adachi N, Fukuhara K, Tanaka H, Nakasa T, Ochi M (2006) Superior retinaculoplasty for recurrent dislocation of peroneal tendons. Foot Ankle Int 27:1074–1078 Beck E (1981) Operative treatment of recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 98:247–250 Cho J, Kim JY, Song DG, Lee WC (2014) Comparison of outcome after retinaculum repair with and without fibular groove deepening for recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Foot Ankle Int 35:683–689 De Das S, Balasubramaniam P (1985) A repair operation for recurrent dislocation of peroneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:585–587 Eckert WR, Davis EA Jr (1976) Acute rupture of the peroneal retinaculum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:670–672 Escalas F, Figueras JM, Merino JA (1980) Dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Long-term results of surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:451–453 Ferran NA, Oliva F, Maffulli N (2006) Recurrent subluxation of the peroneal tendons. Sports Med 36:839–846 Jones EB (1931) Operative treatment of chronic dislocation of the peroneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg 14:574 Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Sward L (1996) Recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6:242–246 Kelly RE (1920) An operation for chronic dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Br J Surg 7:502–504 Kennedy JG, van Dijk PA, Murawski CD, Duke G, Newman H, DiGiovanni CW, Yasui Y (2016) Functional outcomes after peroneal tendoscopy in the treatment of peroneal tendon disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1148–1154 Kollias SL, Ferkel RD (1997) Fibular grooving for recurrent peroneal tendon subluxation. Am J Sports Med 25:329–335 Larsen E, Flink-Olsen M, Seerup K (1984) Surgery for recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Acta Orthop Scand 55:554–555 Lui TH (2006) Endoscopic peroneal retinaculum reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:478–481 Maqdes A, Steltzlen C, Pujol N (2016) Endoscopic fibular groove deepening for stabilisation of recurrent peroneal tendons instability in a patient with open physes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4210-2 Martens MA, Noyez JF, Mulier JC (1986) Recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Results of rerouting the tendons under the calcaneofibular ligament. Am J Sports Med 14:148–150 Mason RB, Henderson JP (1996) Traumatic peroneal tendon instability. Am J Sports Med 24:652–658 Ogawa BK, Thordarson DB (2007) Current concepts review: peroneal tendon subluxation and dislocation. Foot Ankle Int 28:1034–1040 Porter D, McCarroll J, Knapp E, Torma J (2005) Peroneal tendon subluxation in athletes: fibular groove deepening and retinacular reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 26:436–441 Raikin SM (2009) Intrasheath subluxation of the peroneal tendons. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):146–155 Sarmiento A, Wolf M (1975) Subluxation of peroneal tendons. Case treated by rerouting tendons under calcaneofibular ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:115–116 Saxena A, Ewen B (2010) Peroneal subluxation: surgical results in 31 athletic patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 49:238–241 Selmani E, Gjata V, Gjika E (2006) Current concepts review: peroneal tendon disorders. Foot Ankle Int 27:221–228 Stein RE (1987) Reconstruction of the superior peroneal retinaculum using a portion of the peroneus brevis tendon. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:298–299 Steinbock G, Pinsger M (1994) Treatment of peroneal tendon dislocation by transposition under the calcaneofibular ligament. Foot Ankle Int 15:107–111 Tomihara T, Shimada N, Yoshida G, Kaneda K, Matsuura T, Satake S (2010) Comparison of modified Das De procedure with Du Vries procedure for traumatic peroneal tendon dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1059–1063 van Dijk PA, Gianakos AL, Kerkhoffs GM, Kennedy JG (2016) Return to sports and clinical outcomes in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocation: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1155–1164 van Dijk PA, Lubberts B, Verheul C, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GM (2016) Rehabilitation after surgical treatment of peroneal tendon tears and ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1165–1174 van Dijk PA, Madirolas FX, Carrera A, Kerkhoffs GM, Reina F (2016) Peroneal tendons well vascularized: results from a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1140–1147 Walther M, Morrison R, Mayer B (2009) Retromalleolar groove impaction for the treatment of unstable peroneal tendons. Am J Sports Med 37:191–194 Zoellner G, Clancy W Jr (1979) Recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:292–294 Zhenbo Z, Jin W, Haifeng G, Huanting L, Feng C, Ming L (2014) Sliding fibular graft repair for the treatment of recurrent peroneal subluxation. Foot Ankle Int 35:496–503