Who does the moose belong to? – Legitimation of collective psychological ownership

Journal of Rural Studies - Tập 86 - Trang 236-246 - 2021
Anne Matilainen1, Merja Lähdesmäki1
1University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Beggan, 1994, Association as a psychological justification for ownership, J. Psychol., 128, 365, 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712741 Belk, 1988, Possessions and the extended self, J. Consum. Res., 15, 139, 10.1086/209154 Bengston, 2011, The diverse values and motivations of family forest owners in the United States: an analysis of an open-ended question in the National Woodland Owner Survey, Small-scale Forestry, 10, 339, 10.1007/s11842-010-9152-9 Berger, 1998, The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders, Am. Socio. Rev., 379, 10.2307/2657555 Bergman, 2006, Moose hunting, forestry, and wolves in Sweden, Alces Boman, 2011, Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited, Environ. Resour. Econ., 50, 515, 10.1007/s10640-011-9480-z Boon, 2004, An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners, Scand. J. For. Res., 19, 45, 10.1080/14004080410034056 Brown, 2006, The role of moral values in contemporary common property enactment, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 60, 89, 10.1080/00291950500535293 Brown, 2014, Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings, J. Organ. Behav., 35, 318, 10.1002/job.1869 Dziki-Michalska, 2019, Increase in the moose (Alces alces L. 1758) population size in Poland: causes and consequences, Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci.-Sggw. Anim. Sci, 58, 203 Erkama, 2010, Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: a rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case, Organ. Stud., 31, 813, 10.1177/0170840609346924 Etzioni, 1991, The socio-economics of property, J. Soc. Behav. Pers., 6, 465 Frey, 1997 Furby, 1991, Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: a personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress, J. Soc. Behav. Pers., 6, 457 Gamborg, 2016, Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners, and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study, Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 21, 328, 10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906 Gibson, 2007, Collective cognition in action: accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace, Acad. Manag. Rev., 32, 438, 10.5465/amr.2007.24351397 Goguen, 2018, Wild-harvested venison yields and sharing by Michigan deer hunters, Hum. Dimen. Wildl., 23, 197, 10.1080/10871209.2017.1409372 Hall, 2005, Qualitative research in family business studies: the usefulness of the interpretive approach Huber, 2012, On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster, Reg. Stud., 46, 1169, 10.1080/00343404.2011.569539 Hybels, 1995, On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: a critical review and integrative theoretical model, vol. 1995, 241 Ingemarsson, 2006, A typology of Small-scale private forest owners in Sweden, Scand. J. For. Res., 21, 249, 10.1080/02827580600662256 Jacoby, 2001 Jussila, 2005 Kankainen, 2014, Hirvenlihan arvo metsästä kulutukseen, Riista- ja kalatalous tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 2014/4 Karppinen, 2010, “Semmonen niinku metsäkansa”: suurten ikäluokkien perijät tulevaisuuden metsänomistajina [“Kind of forest people”: inheritors of the postwar baby-boom generation as the future forest owners], Metsätieteen Aikakauskirja, 1, 19 Karppinen, 2020 Keskinarkaus, 2009 Kuuluvainen, 2014, Effects of gender and length of land tenure on timber supply in Finland, J. For. Econ., 20, 363 La Mela, 2014, Property rights in conflict: wild berry-picking and the Nordic tradition of allemansrätt, Scand. Econ. Hist. Rev., 62, 266, 10.1080/03585522.2013.876928 Lähdesmäki, 2019, Stakeholder salience for small businesses: a social proximity perspective, J. Bus. Ethics, 158, 373, 10.1007/s10551-017-3707-z Leppänen, 2015, Metsämaan omistus 2013, Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus, 2015, 10 Ljung, 2012, Eat prey and love: game-meat consumption and attitudes toward hunting, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 36, 669, 10.1002/wsb.208 Ljung, 2015, Game meat consumption feeds urban support of traditional use of natural resources, Soc. Nat. Resour., 28, 657, 10.1080/08941920.2014.933929 Luke Marescotti, 2019, Discovering market segments for hunted wild game meat, Meat Sci., 149, 163, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.019 Martinaityte, 2020, Is the project ‘mine’or ‘ours’? A multilevel investigation of the effects of individual and collective psychological ownership, J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 93, 302, 10.1111/joop.12300 Matala, 2015, Hirvi metsätalouden säätelijänä, 247 Matala, 2019, Hirvituhotilanne 2018, 56 Matilainen, 2019 Matilainen, A., Luomala, H., Lähdesmäki, M., Viitaharju, L., Kurki, S., forthcoming. Resenting the Hunters, but Appreciating the Prey? - Identifying Moose Meat Consumer Segments. Matilainen, 2017, “I feel it is mine!”–Psychological ownership in relation to natural resources, J. Environ. Psychol., 51, 31, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.002 Mattsson, 1990, Hunting in Sweden: extent, economic values and structural problems, Scand. J. For. Res., 5, 563, 10.1080/02827589009382639 Mattsson, 2014, More or less moose: how is the hunting value affected?, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 170, 10.1080/02827581.2014.881545 Milner, 2005, Hunting moose or keeping sheep?-Producing meat in areas with carnivores, Alces, 41, 49 Mitchell, 1997, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts, Acad. Manag. Rev., 22, 853, 10.2307/259247 Øian, 2016, Property and possession: hunting tourism and the morality of landownership in rural Norway, Soc. Nat. Resour., 29, 104, 10.1080/08941920.2015.1041658 Patton, 2002 Peltola, 2014 Peng, 2015, Job-and organization-based psychological ownership: relationship and outcomes, J. Manag. Psychol., 10.1108/JMP-07-2012-0201 Pierce, 2010, Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: construct introduction and elaboration, J. Organ. Behav., 31, 810, 10.1002/job.628 Pierce, 2011 Pierce, 2004, The psychology of ownership and worker-owner productivity, Group Organ. Manag., 29, 588, 10.1177/1059601103254270 Pierce, 2001, Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations, Acad. Manag. Rev., 26, 298, 10.2307/259124 Pierce, 2003, The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research, Rev. Gen. Psychol., 7, 84, 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 Pohja-Mykrä, 2018, Current status and development prospects of business models related to the wilderness economy, Publications of the Government ́s analysis, assessment and research activities 40/2018 Preston, 2020, This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership, J. Environ. Psychol., 70, 101443, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101443 Rantanen, 2011, F-CPO: a collective psychological ownership approach to capturing realized family influence on business, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 139, 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.005 Rämö, 2009, 47 Sandström, 2013, Conflict resolution through ecosystem-based management: the case of Swedish moose management, Int. J. Commons, 10.18352/ijc.349 Selby, 2007 Shanley, 2012, From conflict of use to multiple use: forest management innovations by small holders in Amazonian logging frontiers, For. Ecol. Manag., 268, 70, 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.041 Shu, 2018, Solving stewardship problems with increased psychological ownership, 227 Sidanius, 2001 Spannring, 2019, Leaving the Meatrix? Transformative learning and denialism in the case of meat consumption, Environ. Educ. Res., 25, 1190, 10.1080/13504622.2018.1455076 Stein, 2001, The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation, Discourse Process, 32, 113, 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02 Storaas, 2001, The economic value of moose in Norway-a review, Alces, 37, 97 Suchman, 1995, Managing legitimacy: strategies and institutional approaches, Acad. Manag. Rev., 20, 571, 10.2307/258788 Toivonen, 2009 Tomasevic, 2018, Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries, Meat Sci., 142, 5, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016 Tõnisson, 2003, Monitoring of moose-forest interactions in Estonia as a tool for game management decisions, Alces, 39, 255 Törrönen, 2002, Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewing using stimulus texts, Qual. Res., 2, 343, 10.1177/146879410200200304 Tyler, 2006, Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 375, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 Vaara, 2010, A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions, Organ. Sci., 21, 3, 10.1287/orsc.1080.0394 Vaismoradi, 2016, Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis, J. Nurs. Educ. Pract., 6, 100 Van Eemeren, 2009, The study of argumentation, 109 Van Leeuwen, 2007, Legitimation in discourse and communication, Discourse Commun., 1, 91, 10.1177/1750481307071986 Verkuyten, 2017, Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 12, 1021, 10.1177/1745691617706514 Von Essen, 2015, The radicalisation of rural resistance: how hunting counterpublics in the Nordic countries contribute to illegal hunting, J. Rural Stud., 39, 199, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.001 Watts, 2017, Hunting cultures and the ‘northern periphery’: exploring their relationship in Scotland and Finland, J. Rural Stud., 54, 255, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.017 Wennberg DiGasper, 2008 Wiklund, 2014, Game meat as a resource in Sweden–with particular focus on moose (Alces alces), Trends in game meat hygiene: From forest to fork, 305, 26 Wilkes-Allemann, 2015, Conflict situations and response strategies in urban forests in Switzerland, Scand. J. For. Res., 30, 204, 10.1080/02827581.2014.1002217 Zelditch, 2001, Processes of legitimation: recent developments and new directions, Soc. Psychol. Q., 64, 4, 10.2307/3090147