A Re-examination of the Effects of Biased Lineup Instructions in Eyewitness Identification

Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizing facial memory: Criterion effects in verbal overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 739–755. Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629–654. Clark, S. E., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law & Human Behavior, 25, 199–216. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Culter, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281–290. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987a). The reliability of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233, 258. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987b). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629–637. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., O’Rourke, T. E., & Martens, T. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behaviour, 1, 113–134. Devenport, J. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). The effect of authority and social influence on eyewitness suggestibility and person recognition. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 11, 35–40. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818–835. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. Technical Note AFCRC-TN-58-51, Hearing and Communication Laboratory, Indiana University. Fleet, M. L., Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1987). The confidence-accuracy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 171–187. Foster, R. A., Libkuman, T. M., Schooler, J. W., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Consequentiality and eyewitness person identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 107–121. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford, England: Wiley. Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, B. L. (1978). False positive identification. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 18, 255–262. Hosch, H. M. Leippe, M. R., Marcioni, P. M., & Cooper, D. S. (1984). Victimization, self-monitoring, and eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 280–288. Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1995). Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 327–334. Iglewicz, B., & Hoaglin, D. C. (1993). How to detect and handle outliers. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality Control Press. Kassin, S. M., Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, V. L. (1989). The “general acceptance” of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089–1098. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405–416. Kohnken, G., & Maas, A. (1988). Eyewitness testimony: False alarms on biased instructions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 363–370 Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., Nosworthy, G. J., Fulford, J. A., Hector, J., LeVan, V. Y., & Seabrook, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796–802. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Malpass, R. S., Devine, P. G., & Bergen, G. T. (1980). Eyewitness identification: Realism vs. the laboratory. Unpublished manuscript. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981a). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482–489. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981b). Realism and eyewitness identification research. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 347–358. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photospreads. In G. L. Wells, & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mosteller, F., & Hoaglin, D. C. (1991). Preliminary examination of data. In D. C. Hoaglin, R. Mosteller, & J. W. Tukey (Eds.), Fundamentals of exploratory analysis of variance (pp. 40–49). New York: Wiley. Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the Witness Stand. New York: Doubleday. Murdock, B. B., Jr., & Y Dufty, P. O. (1972). Strength theory and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 284–290. Navon, D. (1992). Selection of lineup foils by similarity to suspect is likely to misfire. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 575–593. Norman, D. A., & Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Strength theory of decision rules and latency in short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 192–208. O’Rourke, T. E., Penrod, S. D., Cutler, B. L., & Stuve, T. E. (1989). The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 385–395. Paley, B., & Geiselman, R. E. (1989). The effects of alternative photospread instructions o suspect identification performance. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 3–13. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518–535. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: Sage. Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183–192. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday. Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283–297. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life, Vol. I. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. Tukey, J. W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In I. Olkin, J. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madoo, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 448–485). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980). Why do eyewitnesses make so many mistakes? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 362–366. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553–571. Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2002). Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 155–167. Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, pp. 277–295. Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1986). Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 320–329. Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & Burger, M. A. (1993). How police officers construct lineups: A national survey. (pp. 640–644), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). A national survey of U.S. police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 10, 69–82.