Global emissions effects of CDM projects with relative baselines

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 34 - Trang 533-548 - 2012
Jon Strand1,2, Knut Einar Rosendahl3
1Development Research Group, Environment and Energy Team, The World Bank, Washington, DC 20433, USA
2Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Norway
3Research Department, Statistics Norway, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akita, J., Imai, H., Niizawa, H., 2007. Ex-Post CDM Baselines, Self-Leakage and counterproductive CDM. Working Paper, University of Kyoto. Akita, J., Imai, H., Niizawa, H., 2008. The Impact of Ex-Ante versus Ex-Post CDM Baselines on a Monopoly Firm. Working Paper, University of Kyoto. Bohm, 1994, On the feasibility of joint implementation of carbon emissions reductions, 181 Dutschke, 1998, Interest groups and efficient design of the clean development mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol, International Journal for Sustainable Development, 1, 24, 10.1504/IJSD.1998.004207 Ellis, 1999 Fischer, 2005, Project-based mechanisms for emissions reductions: balancing trade-offs with baselines, Energy Policy, 33, 1807, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.016 Flues, 2010, What determines UN approval of greenhouse gas emission reduction projects in developing countries? An analysis of decision making of the CDM executive board, Public Choice, 145, 1, 10.1007/s11127-009-9525-9 Fudenberg, 1992 Germain, 2007, How to design and use the clean development mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol? A developing country perspective, Environmental and Resource Economics, 38, 13, 10.1007/s10640-006-9066-3 Green, J., 2010. Implementing an Effective E+/E− Policy. Presentation in the World Bank, May 4, 2010. Greiner, 2003, Defining investment additionality for CDM projects—practical approaches, Energy Policy, 31, 1007, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00142-8 Hagem, 1996, Joint implementation under asymmetric information and strategic behavior, Environmental and Resource Economics, 8, 431, 10.1007/BF00357412 Hagem, 2009, The clean development mechanism versus international permit trading: the effect of technological change, Resource and Energy Economics, 31, 1, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.10.002 Laffont, 1993 Lazarus, 2000 Michaelowa, 1998, Joint implementation: a baseline issue, Global Environmental Change, 8, 81, 10.1016/S0959-3780(97)00022-8 Michaelowa, 2011, Waking up the sleeping giant: how the new Benchmark methodology can boost CDM in the building sector, Trading Carbon Magazine, 5, 32 Michaelowa, A., Purohit, P., 2007. Additionality determination of Indian CDM Projects. Can Indian CDM Project Developers Outwit the CDM Executive Board? Climate Strategies, Discussion Paper CDM-1, London. Morse, R.K., 2010. Strengthening the CDM through E+/E− reform. Presentation in the World Bank, May 4, 2010. OECD, 2001 Probase, 2003. Procedures for Accounting and Baselines for JI and CDM Projects: Final Report, Groningen. Rosendahl, 2011, Leakage from the clean development mechanism, The Energy Journal, 32, 27 Schneider, 2007 Schneider, 2011, Perverse incentives under the CDM: an evaluation of HFC-23 destruction projects, Climate Policy, 11, 851, 10.3763/cpol.2010.0096 Strand, 2011, Carbon offsets with endogenous environmental policy, Energy Economics, 32, 371, 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.11.006 UNEP, 2005 UNFCCC, 2011 Walker, 1994, On the efficiency and effectiveness of JI in stabilising CO2 emissions, OPEC Bulletin, 63, 16 Wirl, 1998, Joint Implementation: strategic reactions and possible remedies, Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 203, 10.1023/A:1008272620797 World Bank, 2010