Ambiguous Findings on Radiographs

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology - Tập 50 - Trang 4-10 - 2021
Sachin S. Kumbhar1, Akshay D. Baheti2, Malak Itani3, Rahul Nikam4
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
2Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO
4Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington DE

Tài liệu tham khảo

Buckle, 2013, Now you see it, now you don't: Visual illusions in radiology, Radiographics, 33, 2087, 10.1148/rg.337125204 Keats, 1981, Some new normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease, Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 10, 1 Brady, 2017, Error and discrepancy in radiology: Inevitable or avoidable?, Insights Imaging, 8, 171, 10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1 Berlin, 2000, Pitfalls of the vague radiology report, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 174, 1511, 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741511 Kim, 2014, Fool me twice: Delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 202, 465, 10.2214/AJR.13.11493 Lee, 2017, Radiology reports: What YOU think you're saying and what THEY think you're saying, Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 46, 186, 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.11.005 Gunn, 2016, Differing interpretations of report terminology between primary care physicians and radiologists, J Am Coll Radiol, 13, 1525, 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.016 Kushner, 2005, American College of R. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline, J Am Coll Radiol., 2, 15, 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.005