The Importance of Consistent Global Forest Aboveground Biomass Product Validation

Geophysical surveys - Tập 40 - Trang 979-999 - 2019
L. Duncanson1, J. Armston1, M. Disney2, V. Avitabile3, N. Barbier4, K. Calders5, S. Carter6, J. Chave7, M. Herold6, T. W. Crowther8, M. Falkowski9, J. R. Kellner10,11, N. Labrière7, R. Lucas12, N. MacBean13, R. E. McRoberts14, V. Meyer15, E. Næsset16, J. E. Nickeson17, K. I. Paul18, O. L. Phillips19, M. Réjou-Méchain4, M. Román20, S. Roxburgh18, S. Saatchi15, D. Schepaschenko21, K. Scipal22, P. R. Siqueira23, A. Whitehurst24, M. Williams25
1Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, USA
2Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK
3European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
4AMAP, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier University, Montpellier cedex 5, France
5CAVElab – Computational and Applied Vegetation Ecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
6Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
7Laboratoire Evolution et Diversit. Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, Universit. Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse cedex 9, France
8Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
9Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
10Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, Providence, USA
11Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, USA
12Earth Observation and Ecosystem Dynamics Research Group, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences (DGES), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
13Department of Geography, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
14USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Saint Paul, St Paul, USA
15Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA
16Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway
17NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, USA
18CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia
19School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
20Earth from Space Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, USA
21International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
22European Space Agency ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
23Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 201 Marcus Hall, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
24Arctic Slope Federal Technical Services, Laurel, USA
25School of GeoScience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Tóm tắt

Several upcoming satellite missions have core science requirements to produce data for accurate forest aboveground biomass mapping. Largely because of these mission datasets, the number of available biomass products is expected to greatly increase over the coming decade. Despite the recognized importance of biomass mapping for a wide range of science, policy and management applications, there remains no community accepted standard for satellite-based biomass map validation. The Committee on Earth Observing Satellites (CEOS) is developing a protocol to fill this need in advance of the next generation of biomass-relevant satellites, and this paper presents a review of biomass validation practices from a CEOS perspective. We outline the wide range of anticipated user requirements for product accuracy assessment and provide recommendations for the validation of biomass products. These recommendations include the collection of new, high-quality in situ data and the use of airborne lidar biomass maps as tools toward transparent multi-resolution validation. Adoption of community-vetted validation standards and practices will facilitate the uptake of the next generation of biomass products.

Tài liệu tham khảo