Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Journal of Arthroplasty - Tập 31 Số 1 - Trang 152-155 - 2016
Bryan D. Haughom1, Darren R. Plummer1, Mario Moric1, Craig J. Della Valle1
1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kurtz, 2007, Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the united states from 2005 to 2030, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 4, 780, 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

Sanchez-Sotelo, 2006, Hospital cost of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2, 290, 10.2106/JBJS.D.02799

Enocson, 2009, Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up, Qual Life Res, 9, 1177, 10.1007/s11136-009-9531-x

Malkani, 2010, Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the medicare population, J Arthroplasty, 6, 21, 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.014

Meek, 2006, Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 9–18

Phillips, 2003, Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1, 20, 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00004

Bozic, 2009, The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1, 128, 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155

Bartz, 2000, The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 9, 1300, 10.2106/00004623-200009000-00010

Burroughs, 2005, Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes, J Arthroplasty, 1, 11, 10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.008

Cross, 2012, Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear, HSS J, 3, 270, 10.1007/s11420-012-9287-7

Allen, 2014, Do larger femoral heads improve the functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty?, J Arthroplasty, 2, 401, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.017

Cuckler, 2004, Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 8, 41, 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.006

Hoell, 2014, The minimal invasive direct anterior approach in combination with large heads in total hip arthroplasty—is dislocation still a major issue? A case control study, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, 80, 10.1186/1471-2474-15-80

Jameson, 2011, Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement: a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England, J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 7, 876, 10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.26657

Lachiewicz, 2006, Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 153–155

Lachiewicz, 2013, Low early and late dislocation rates with 36- and 40-mm heads in patients at high risk for dislocation, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2, 439, 10.1007/s11999-012-2379-3

Stroh, 2013, Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads, J Arthroplasty, 8, 1415, 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.017

Adam, 2012, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 3, 296, 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005

Bensen, 2014, Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, Int Orthop, 6, 1241, 10.1007/s00264-013-2276-8

Boyer, 2012, Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips, Int Orthop, 3, 511, 10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4

Combes, 2013, Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 12, 3891, 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3

Epinette, 2014, Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients?, J Arthroplasty, 6, 1323, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.011

Jiang, 2011, A systematic review of modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty in active young patients, J Arthroplasty, 3, 419, 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.008

Marshall, 2014, Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 7, 2217, 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3

Park, 2014, Total hip arthroplasty using large-diameter metal-on-metal articulation in patients with neuromuscular weakness, J Arthroplasty, 4, 797, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.012

Philippot, 2009, The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years, Int Orthop, 4, 927, 10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9

Prudhon, 2013, Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up, Int Orthop, 12, 2345, 10.1007/s00264-013-2067-2

Sanders, 2013, The use of a dual-mobility concept in total hip arthroplasty patients with spastic disorders: no dislocations in a series of ten cases at midterm follow-up, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 7, 1011, 10.1007/s00402-013-1759-9

Stuchin, 2008, Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 52–56

Tarasevicius, 2013, A comparison of outcomes and dislocation rates using dual articulation cups and THA for intracapsular femoral neck fractures, Hip Int, 1, 22, 10.5301/HIP.2013.10632

Hailer, 2012, The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Acta Orthop, 5, 442, 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919

Berry, 2004, The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1, 9, 10.2106/00004623-200401000-00003

Kim, 2009, Influence of patient-, design-, and surgery-related factors on rate of dislocation after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 8, 1258, 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.017

Krenzel, 2010, High preoperative range of motion is a significant risk factor for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 6, 31, 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.007

von Knoch, 2002, Late dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 11, 1949, 10.2106/00004623-200211000-00007

Zwartele, 2004, Increased risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: a prospective observational study of 410 hips, Acta Orthop Scand, 6, 684, 10.1080/00016470410004049

Rathi, 2013, The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 8, E53

Amlie, 2010, Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head, J Orthop Traumatol, 2, 111, 10.1007/s10195-010-0097-8

Berry, 2005, Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 11, 2456, 10.2106/JBJS.D.02860

Callaghan, 2001, Prevention of dislocation after hip arthroplasty: lessons from long-term followup, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 393, 157, 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00018

Hedlundh, 1996, Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 333, 226, 10.1097/00003086-199612000-00024

Ho, 2012, Reducing the rate of early primary hip dislocation by combining a change in surgical technique and an increase in femoral head diameter to 36 mm, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 7, 1031, 10.1007/s00402-012-1508-5

Howie, 2012, Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 12, 1095, 10.2106/JBJS.K.00570

Khatod, 2006, An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 19–23

Kostensalo, 2013, Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Acta Orthop, 4, 342, 10.3109/17453674.2013.810518

Lombardi, 2011, Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 6, 1547, 10.1007/s11999-010-1605-0

Peters, 2007, Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 6, 140, 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.019

Singh, 2013, Head size and dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty, Indian J Orthop, 5, 443, 10.4103/0019-5413.118198

Wang, 2012, Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty among patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, J Arthroplasty, 5, 764, 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.021

Brown, 2014, Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences, Iowa Orthop J, 1–15

Elkins, 2014, Stability and trunnion wear potential in large-diameter metal-on-metal total hips: a finite element analysis, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2, 529, 10.1007/s11999-013-3244-8

Molli, 2011, Metal-on-metal vs metal-on-improved polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 6, 8, 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.029