Bipolar versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Djavan, 2002, The urologist view of BPH progression: results of an international survey, Eur Urol, 41, 490, 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00065-9 Abrams, 2009, Evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men, J Urol, 18, 1779, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.127 Verhamme, 2002, Incidence and prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care—the Triumph project, Eur Urol, 42, 323, 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00354-8 Wei, 2008, Urologic Diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia, J Urol, 179, S75, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.141 Reich, 2006, Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures for BPH, Eur Urol, 49, 970, 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.072 de la Rosette, 2009, Tailoring treatment in benign prostatic hyperplasia management, Curr Opin Urol, 19, 1, 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831743e7 Rassweiler, 2006, Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention, Eur Urol, 50, 969, 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.042 Reich, 2008, Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients, J Urol, 180, 246, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058 Mamoulakis, 2009, Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: the “golden standard” reclaims its leading position, Curr Opin Urol, 19, 26, 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328320a61a Higgins JPT, Altman DG, eds; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.1. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/. Updated September 2008. Higgins, 2003, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, BMJ, 327, 557, 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 Rassweiler, 2007, Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate-technical modifications and early clinical experience, Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 16, 11, 10.1080/13645700601159410 Ho, 2008, Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: a new reference standard?, Curr Opin Urol, 18, 50, 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f194db Faul, 2008, Clinical and technical aspects of bipolar transurethral prostate resection, Scand J Urol Nephrol, 42, 318, 10.1080/00365590802201300 Issa, 2008, Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: bipolar versus monopolar TURP, J Endourol, 22, 1587, 10.1089/end.2008.0192 de la Rosette, 2008, Minimally invasive treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms, Urol Clin North Am, 35, 505, 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.05.001 Lourenco T, Pickard R, Vale L, et al. Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2008;30;337:a449. Lourenco T, Armstrong N, N’Dow J, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Southampton, UK: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; 2008. http://www.hta.ac.uk/1468. Singh, 2005, Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study, J Endourol, 19, 333, 10.1089/end.2005.19.333 Tefekli, 2005, A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison, J Urol, 174, 1339, 10.1097/01.ju.0000173075.62504.73 de Sio, 2006, Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial, Urology, 67, 69, 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.033 Nuhoğlu, 2006, Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: results of 1-year follow up, Int J Urol, 13, 21, 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01218.x Seckiner, 2006, A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP, Urol Int, 76, 139, 10.1159/000090877 Kim, 2006, Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A comparative study with monopolar transurethral resection, Korean J Urol, 47, 493, 10.4111/kju.2006.47.5.493 Yang, 2004, Gyrus plasmasect: is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate?, Urol Int, 73, 258, 10.1159/000080838 Patankar, 2006, PlasmaKinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate, J Endourol, 20, 215, 10.1089/end.2006.20.215 Abascal Junquera, 2006, Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: preoperative analysis of the results, Actas Urol Esp, 30, 661, 10.1016/S0210-4806(06)73515-X Akçayöz, 2006, Comparison of transurethral resection and plasmakinetic transurethral resection applications with regard to fluid absorption amounts in benign prostate hyperplasia, Urol Int, 77, 143, 10.1159/000093909 Lin, 2006, Comparison between monopolar and bipolar TURP in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1-year report, Mid-Taiwan J Med, 11, 143 Erturhan, 2007, Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 10, 97, 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500907 Ho, 2007, A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system, Eur Urol, 52, 517, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038 Rose, 2007, Transurethral resection of bladder tumors and prostate enlargement in physiological saline solution (TURIS). A prospective study [in German], Urologe A, 46, 1148, 10.1007/s00120-007-1391-9 Michielsen, 2007, Bipolar transurethral resection in saline-an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction?, J Urol, 178, 2035, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.038 Iori, 2008, Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: clinical and urodynamic evaluation, Urology, 71, 252, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.064 Bhansali, 2009, Management of large (>60g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate, J Endourol, 23, 141, 10.1089/end.2007.0005 Autorino, 2009, Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate, Eur Urol, 55, 922, 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.028 Wu, 2005, Therapeutic efficacy of bipolar plasmakinetic technique compared with transurethral resection on benign prostate hyperplasia [in Chinese], Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 85, 3365 Yoon, 2006, Transurethral resection of the prostate with a bipolar tissue management system compared to conventional monopolar resectoscope: one-year outcome, Yonsei Med J, 47, 715, 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.5.715 Uria, 2005, Transurethral resection with saline solution: a technological achievement not yet assimilated by the urological community, Arch Esp Urol, 58, 335 Gilleran, 2006, Rapid communication: bipolar PlasmaKinetic transurethral resection of the prostate: reliable training vehicle for today's urology residents, J Endourol, 20, 683, 10.1089/end.2006.20.683 Issa, 2004, Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st century, Urology, 64, 298, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.023 Starkman, 2005, Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications, BJU Int, 95, 69, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x Wendt-Nordahl, 2004, The Vista system: a new bipolar resection device for endourological procedures: comparison with conventional resectoscope, Eur Urol, 46, 586, 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.018 Wendt-Nordahl, 2005, New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation, J Endourol, 19, 1203, 10.1089/end.2005.19.1203 Huang, 2007, Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: pathologic study in canines, Urology, 70, 180, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.051 Qu, 2007, Use of a novel ex-vivo model to compare the hemostatic properties of plasmakinetic resection, transurethral vaporization resection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate, Urology, 70, 1034, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.015 Huang, 2008, Comparison of the microvessel diameter of hyperplastic prostate and the coagulation depth achieved with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. A pilot study on hemostatic capability, Scan J Urol Nephrol, 42, 265, 10.1080/00365590701702168 Qu, 2008, The hemostatic properties of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate: comparison with conventional resectoscope in an ex vivo study, Urol Int, 80, 292, 10.1159/000127344 Ho H, Lim KB. Re: Bipolar transurethral resection in saline-an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction? Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, et al. J Urol 2007; 178:2035–2039. J Urol 2008; 179:2482–3. Reich, 2007, Editorial comment on: a prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system, Eur Urol, 52, 523, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.040