Understanding the dynamics of technological configurations: A conceptual framework and the case of Smart Homes

Baldwin, 2000 Clark, 1985, The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution, Res. Policy, 14, 235, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1 Henderson, 1990, Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and failures of established firms, Admin. Sci. Quart., 35, 9, 10.2307/2393549 Murmann, 2006, Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change, Res. Policy, 35, 925, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011 2003 Fleck, 1993, Configurations: crystallizing contingency, Int. J. Hum. Factor. Man., 3, 15, 10.1002/hfm.4530030104 Molina, 1999, Understanding the role of the technical in the build-up of sociotechnical constituencies, Technovation, 19, 1, 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00093-5 Abernathy, 1978, Patterns of industrial innovation, Technol. Rev., 80, 41 Anderson, 1990, Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change, Admin. Sci. Quart., 35, 604, 10.2307/2393511 Rosenkopf, 1994, The coevolution of technology and organization, 403 Utterback, 1993, Innovation, competition, and industry structure, Res. Policy, 22, 1, 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90030-L Brusoni, 2006, Making design rules: a multidomain perspective, Organ. Sci., 17, 179, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0180 Christensen, 1995, Explaining the attacker's advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network, Res. Policy, 24, 233, 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00764-K Baldwin, 2006, How user innovations become commercial products: a theoretical investigation and case study, Res. Policy, 35, 1291, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012 Stankiewicz, 2000, The concept of ‘design space’, 234 Ulrich, 1995, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Res. Policy, 24, 419, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 Ernst, 2005, Limits to modularity: reflections on recent developments in chip design, Industry and Innovation, 12, 303, 10.1080/13662710500195918 Baldwin, 2006, Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems, 1 2003 Langlois, 2003, The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism, Ind. Corp. Change, 12, 351, 10.1093/icc/12.2.351 Sanchez, 1996, Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design, Strategic Manage. J., 17, 63, 10.1002/smj.4250171107 Sturgeon, 2002, Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization, Ind. Corp. Change, 11, 451, 10.1093/icc/11.3.451 Hoetker, 2006, Do modular products lead to modular organizations?, Strategic Manage. J., 27, 501, 10.1002/smj.528 Brusoni, 2001, Unpacking the black box of modularity: technologies, products and organizations, Ind. Corp. Change, 10, 179, 10.1093/icc/10.1.179 Pavitt, 2003, Specialization and systems integration — where manufacture and service still meet, 78 Prencipe, 2003, Corporate strategy and systems integration capabilities — managing networks in complex systems industries, 114 Mitchell, 1983, Case and situation analysis, Sociol. Rev., 31, 187, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1983.tb00387.x Yin, 1993 Peine, 2006 Peine, 2008, Technological paradigms and complex technical systems - the case of smart homes, Res. Policy, 37, 508, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.009 Travi, 2001 Miles, 1992, The shape of things to consume, 68 Moran, 1993 Tidd, 1995, Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks — the case of home automation, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 12, 307, 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00026-P Gann, 1999 Harper, 2003, Inside the Smart Home: ideas, possibilities and methods, 1 Aldrich, 2003, Smart Homes: past, present and future, 17 Miles, 1993, Bringing computer power to the consumer market, Technol. Anal. Strateg., 5, 151, 10.1080/09537329308524126 Allen, 1999 Langheinrich, 2005, Living in a smart environment — implications for the coming ubiquitous information society, Telecommunications Review, 15, 132 K. Konrad. Innovationfeldanalyse Smart Building: Gebäudevernetzung — Katalysator für eine Restrukturierung der Versorungsregime, Report to the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), available at: http://mikrosysteme.org/documents/IMV_Bericht_AP_510_smart_building.pdf (2006). Meyer, 2001 Cheverst, 2003, Design with care — technology, disability and the home, 163 Rosenthal, 2006, Ethnographies at the front end: designing for enhanced customer experience, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 23, 215, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00195.x Tolmie, 2003, Towards the unremarkable computer: making technology at home in domestic routines, 183 Glatzer, 1998 Heimer, 1995, The genesis of intelligent home technology, 105 Suarez, 2004, Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework, Res. Policy, 33, 271, 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.001 Barlow, 2003, Smart Home, dumb suppliers? The future of Smart Homes markets, 247 Mattern, 2005, Ubiquitous computing: scenarios from an informatised world, 145 Barlow, 2006, Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: experiences of ‘Telecare’, Technovation, 26, 396, 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.010 Brady, 2005, Can integrated solutions business models work in construction?, Build. Res. Inf., 33, 571, 10.1080/09613210500285064 The Economist, The Digital Home — Science Fiction?, September 2005. Gesellschaft für Konsumforschung, Smart Home 2004, Nuremberg, 2005. VDI/VDE-IT, and Prognos, Anforderungen an die Technologie - und Wirtschaftspolitik durch die Konvergenz der elektronischen Medien, Report, available at: http://www.vdivde-it.de/publikationen/studien_html (2004). Aarts, 2002, Ambient intelligence, 235 2003 Brown, 2008, Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: the case of zero energy residential building, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 75, 107, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.014 Heusinger, 2005 Hughes, 2000, Patterns of home life: informing design for domestic environments, Personal Technologies, 4, 25, 10.1007/BF01613596 J. Fleck. Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in robotics, Edinburgh University PICT Working Paper No. 4 (1988). Fleck, 1994, Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology, Res. Policy, 23, 637, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90014-0 Fleck, 2000, Artefact-activity: the coevolution of artefacts, knowledge and organization in technological innovation, 248 Fleck, 1994, Continuous evolution — corporate configurations of information technology, 178 Fleck, 1995, Configurations and standardizations, 38 DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, Am. Sociol. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 Cawson, 1995 Haddon, 1998, The role of paradigms in the development of household technologies, 58 Molina, 1995, Sociotechnical constituencies as processes of alignment: the rise of a large-scale European information technology initiative, Technol. Soc., 17, 385, 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00016-K Molina, 1997, Insights into the nature of technology diffusion and implementation: the perspective of sociotechnical alignment, Technovation, 17, 601, 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00076-X A. Peine, The sources of use information - a review of relevant literature and an exploration into innovation and aging, European University Institute Working Papers, MWP 2007/26 (2007). Hippel, 2005 Lüthje, 2004, Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer good field — an empirical study of sport-related product consumers, Technovation, 24, 683, 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00150-5 2005 D. Prendergast, and S. Roberts. Practice, systems and technology for elders, Paper presented at the HCI 2006 Conference, London, available at: http://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/~jag76/hci_workshop06/prendergast_et_al.pdf (2006). Rosenkopf, 1998, The coevolution of community networks and technology: lessons from the flight simulation industry, Ind. Corp. Change, 7, 311, 10.1093/icc/7.2.311