Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix

2010

Aragon, 2012, A social capital approach for network policy learning: the case of an established cluster initiative, European Urban and Regional Studies

Aranguren, 2008

Aranguren, 2013, Nested Methodological Approaches for Cluster Policy Evaluation: An Application to the Basque Country, Regional Studies

Aranguren, 2013, La evaluación como herramienta para transformar las políticas de competitividad, Economía Industrial, 387, 159

Arnold, 2004, Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations, Research Evaluation, 13, 3, 10.3152/147154404781776509

Bach, 2002, Rationale for science & technology policy

Bennet, 1992, The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change, Policy Sciences, 25, 275, 10.1007/BF00138786

Bilbao-Osorio, 2009

Borrás, 2008

Borrás, 2009

Borrás, 2011, Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies, Science and Public Policy, 38, 725, 10.3152/030234211X13070021633323

Carlsson, 1997, In search of a useful technology policy – general lessons and key issues for policy makers

Chaminade, 2009, Designing innovation policies for development: towards a systemic experimentation-based approach

Clarysse, 2009, Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: a learning perspective, Research Policy, 38, 1517, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003

Cooke, 1992, Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe, Geoforum, 23, 365, 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9

Cooke, 1998

Cooke, 1997, Regional systems of innovation: Institutions and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26, 475, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

Cooke, 2000

Cooksy, 2005, Quality, context and use: issues in achieving the goals of metaevaluations, American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 31, 10.1177/1098214004273252

Covarrubias, 2013

De La Maza-y-Aramburu, 2012, Where is the value of cluster associations for SMEs, Intangible Capital, 8, 472, 10.3926/ic.346

Diez, 2002, Evaluating new regional policies: Reviewing the theory and practice, Evaluation, 8, 285, 10.1177/135638902401462439

Edler, 2008, Improving policy understanding by means of secondary analyses of policy evaluation, Research Evaluation, 17, 175, 10.3152/095820208X331667

Edquist, 2001, Innovation policy – a systemic approach

Edquist, 2008

European Commission, 2012

Flanagan, 2011, Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation, Research Policy, 40, 702, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005

Garcia, 2010

Georghiou, 2002

Howlett, 2005, What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes, and policy-implementation styles

Imam, 2007, Introduction

Koschatzky, 2007, Which side of the coin? The regional governance of science and innovation, Regional Studies, 48, 1115, 10.1080/00343400701530857

Koschatzky, 2010, A new challenge for regional policy-making in Europe? Chances and risks of the merger between cohesion and innovation policy, European Planning Studies, 18, 7, 10.1080/09654310903343492

Kuhlmann, 2001, Future governance of innovation policy in Europe-three scenarios, Research Policy, 30, 953, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00167-0

Kuhlmann, 2003, Evaluation as a source of strategic intelligence

Laranja, 2008, Policies for science, technology and innovation: translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting, Research Policy, 37, 823, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006

Lundvall, 1997

Lundvall, 2005, Science, technology, innovation and knowledge policy

Magro, E., 2012. Evaluation in a systemic world: the role of regional science and technology policy. PhD thesis, University of Deusto. Published at www.orkestra.deusto.es.

Malerba, 2010, Increase learning, break knowledge, lock-ins and foster dynamic complementarities: evolutionary and system perspectives on technology policy in industrial dynamics

Metcalfe, 1995, Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 25

Molas-Gallart, 2006, Toward theory-led evaluation: the experience of European science, technology and innovation policies, American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 64, 10.1177/1098214005281701

Morgan, 2004, The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 3, 10.1093/jeg/4.1.3

Mundell, 1962, The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability, IMF Staff Papers, March, 70, 10.2307/3866082

Nauwelaers, 2003, Towards a new paradigm for innovation policies?

Nauwelaers, 2008, Innovation policy, innovation in policy: policy learning within and across systems and clusters

Nauwelaers, 2009

Navarro, 2009

Navarro, 2010

OECD, 2010

OECD, 2011, 10.1787/9789264097377-en

Pitelis, 2006

Scholte Jan, 2000

Scott Allen, 1998

Smith, 2000, Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy, Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 73, 10.1080/146324400363536

Smits, 2004, The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation, 1, 4, 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621

Sonnichsen, 1999, Building evaluation capacity within organizations

Storper, 1997

Tödling, 1999, Innovation systems in regions of Europe: a comparative perspective, European Planning Studies, 7, 699, 10.1080/09654319908720549

Tödling, 2005, One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional policy approach, Research Policy, 34, 1203

Uyarra, 2010, From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 681, 10.1068/c0961

Walendowski, 2011