Unilateral effects of partial acquisitions: consistent calculation of GUPPI under horizontal merger guidelines within the EU

Economia e Politica Industriale - Tập 44 - Trang 315-325 - 2016
Panagiotis N. Fotis1, Michael L. Polemis2, Konstantinos Eleftheriou2
1Hellenic Competition Commission, Athens, Greece
2Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece

Tóm tắt

We derive a consistent formula of the Gross Upward Pricing Pressure Index (GUPPI) with Council Regulation Horizontal Merger Guidelines (2004) by: (i) expressing the amount of acquired equity stake as a function of the market share of the victim firm and (ii) assuming a logit demand function. The results show that the anti-competitive effects of partial acquisitions are higher in this case than under partial acquisitions with constant equity stakes and that competition authorities should be skeptical when they use traditional screening indicators in order to estimate the unilateral effects of partial acquisitions in Bertrand markets with differentiated products.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amundsen, E. S., & Bergman, L. (2002). Will cross-ownership re-estabish market power in the Nordic power market? The Energy Journal, 23(2), 73–95. Anderson, P. S., & de Palma, A. (1990). The logit as a model of product differentiation: Further results and extensions. Discussion Paper No 913, Northwestern University. Bresnahan, T. F., & Salop, S. C. (1986). Quantifying the competitive effects of production joint ventures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4(2), 155–175. Brito, D. L., Cabral, L., & Vasconcelos, H. (2014a). Divesting ownership in a rival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 34, 9–24. Brito, D., Ribeiro, R., & Vasconcelos, H. (2014b). Measuring unilateral effects in partial horizontal acquisitions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 33, 22–36. Brito, D., Osorio, A., Ribeiro, R., & Vasconselos, H. (2015). Unilateral effects screens for partial horizontal acquisitions: The generalized HHI and GUPPI (pp. 1–47). Mimeo (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2627103). Clayton, J. M., & Jorgensen, N. B. (2005). Optimal cross holding with externalities and strategic interactions. Journal of Business, 78(4), 1505–1522. Deneckere, R., & Davidson, C. (1985). Incentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(4), 473–486. Dietzenbacher, E., Smid, B., & Volkerink, B. (2000). Horizontal integration in the Dutch financial sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1223–1242. Department of Justice (DoJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines (available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/merger-review/100819hmg.pdf). Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1990). Asset ownership and market structure in oligopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(2), 275–292. Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2010). Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics (Policies and Perspectives), 10(1), 1–39. Flath, D. (1991). When is it rational for firms to acquire silent interests in rivals? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(4), 573–583. Foros, O., Kind, H. J., & Shaffer, G. (2011). Mergers and partial ownership. European Economic Review, 55(7), 916–926. Fotis, P., & Zevgolis, N. (2016). The competitive effects of minority shareholdings: legal and economic issues. Bloomsbury, Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing. Hausman, J., Moresi, S., & Rainey, R. (2011). Unilateral effects of mergers with general linear demand. Economics Letters, 111(2), 119–121. Huck, S., Konrad, K. A., & Müller, W. (2001). Big fish eat small fish: On mergers in Stackelberg markets. Economics Letters, 73, 213–217. Mathiesen, L., Øivind, A. N., & Sørgard, L. (2012). A note on upward pricing pressure: The possibility of false positives. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 8(4), 881–887. O’Brien, D., & Salop, C. S. (2000). Competitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate control. Antitrust Law Journal, 67, 559–614. Official Journal of the European Union (OJ), C 31/5. (2004). Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings. 2004/C 31/03 (available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004XC0205(02)&rid=1). Ono, H., Nakazato, T., Davis, C., & Alley, W. (2004). Partial ownership arrangements in the Japanese automobile industry; 1990–2000. Journal of Applied Economics, 7(2), 355–367. Reynolds, R. J., & Snapp, B. R. (1986). The economic effects of partial acquisitions and joint ventures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4, 141–153. Salop, C. S., Moresi, S. (2009). Updating the merger guidelines: Comments (available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_comments/horizontal-merger-guidelines-review-project-545095-00032/545095-00032.pdf). Shapiro, C. (1996). Mergers with differentiated products. Antitrust, 10(2), 23–30. Shelegia, S., & Spiegel, Y. (2012). Bertrand competition when firms hold passive ownership stakes in one another. Economics Letters, 114(1), 136–138. Shubik, M. (1980). Market structure and behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Willig, D. R. (1991). Merger analysis, industrial organization theory, and merger guidelines. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (pp. 281–332). Willig, D. R. (2011). Unilateral competitive effects of mergers: Upward pricing pressure, product quality, and other extensions. Review of Industrial Organization, 39(1–2), 19–38.