In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander, 2008
Armstrong, 2005, Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology, Educational Review, 57, 457, 10.1080/00131910500279551
Arvaja, 2009, Collaborative learning and computer-supported collaborative learning environments
Baines, 2007, Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment, British Educational Research Journal, 33, 663, 10.1080/01411920701582231
Baines, 2009, Improving pupil group work interaction and dialogue in primary classrooms: Results from a year-long intervention study, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 95, 10.1080/03057640802701960
Barnes, 2008, Exploratory talk for learning, 1
Barron, 2003, When smart groups fail, The Journal of Learning Science, 12, 307, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
Blatchford, 2003, Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8
Bruner, 1986
Cazdan, 2001
Cogill, J. (2003). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching? <http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_Interactive_whiteboards_in_the_primary_school.pdf> Retrieved 04.05.09.
Dawes, 2004, Talk and learning in classroom science, International Journal of Science Education, 26, 677, 10.1080/0950069032000097424
Dawes, 2008
Dawes, 2008, Encouraging students’ contributions to dialogue during science, School Science Review, 90, 1
DCSF (2008). The Assessment for Learning Strategy. <http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publications&ProductId=DCSF-00341-2008> Retrieved 07.04.09.
DfES, 2004
Edwards, 1990
Esarte-Sarries, 2003, Scratching the surface: A typology of Interactive Teaching
Galton, 1999, Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976–96, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 23, 10.1080/0141192990250103
Glover, 2005, The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 155, 10.1080/14759390500200199
Gott, 1995
Hennessy, 2006, Integrating technology into the teaching and learning of school science: A situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research, Studies in Science Education, 42, 1, 10.1080/03057260608560219
Hennessy, 2009, Intermediate theory’ building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies, Teachers College Record, 111, 1753, 10.1177/016146810911100701
Hennessy, 2007, Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 283, 10.1080/17439880701511131
Higgins, 2007, Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 213, 10.1080/17439880701511040
Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H., et al. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: Final report by the University of Newcastle for the Department of Education and Skills. <http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/univ_newcastle_evaluation_whiteboards.pdf> Retrieved 07.04.09
Howe, 2003, Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 51, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00073-9
Howe, 2007, Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning, Learning and Instruction, 17, 549, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004
Jewitt, 2007, Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teacher design of texts for interactive white boards in the secondary school classroom, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 303, 10.1080/17439880701511149
John, 2005, Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT, Educational Review, 57, 405, 10.1080/00131910500278256
Kennewell, 2007, The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 227, 10.1080/17439880701511073
Kress, 2001
Kutnick, 2008, Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity, Learning and Instruction, 18, 83, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.12.002
Laurillard, 2004, Re-thinking the teaching of Science
Leach, 2004, Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing on the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning
Linn, 2000, WISE science, Educational Leadership, 58, 29
Looi, 2010, Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness, Computers and Education, 54, 14, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.003
Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7
Mercer, 2000
Mercer, 2005, Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137, 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
Mercer, 2004, Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science, British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359, 10.1080/01411920410001689689
2008
Mercer, 2007
Mercer, 2006, Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems, Language and Education, 20, 507, 10.2167/le678.0
Mercer, 1999, Is ‘exploratory talk’ productive talk?
Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levačić, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. DfES Research Paper 816, London.
Noffke, 2005, Action research, 89
Nordkvelle, 2005, Visions for ICT, ethics and the practice of teachers, Education and Information Technologies, 10, 21, 10.1007/s10639-005-6745-6
Osbourne, 2002, EPSE project 3: Teaching pupils ‘ideas-about-science’, School Science Review, 84, 29
Piaget, 1969
Reznitskaya, 2009, Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 29, 10.1080/03057640802701952
Rogoff, 1995, Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, 139
Rojas-Drummond, 2003, Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2
Rojas-Drummond, 2003, Talking for reasoning among Mexican primary school children, Learning and Instruction, 13, 653, 10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00003-3
Rudd, T. (2007). Interactive whiteboards in the classroom. Bristol: Futurelab Report: IWBs 2007.
Skidmore, 2006, Pedagogy and dialogue, Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 503, 10.1080/03057640601048407
Smith, 2006, Impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher–pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies, British Educational Research Journal, 32, 443, 10.1080/01411920600635452
Somekh, 2007
Tharp, 1988
Vygotsky, 1962
Wall, 2005, ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 851, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00508.x
Warwick, 2008, Primary teachers’ understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children’s collaborative learning and knowledge-building, Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 269, 10.1080/17439880802496935
Warwick, 2006, Using data comparison and interpretation to develop procedural understandings in the primary classroom: Case study evidence from action research, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 443, 10.1080/09500690500277896
Webb, 2009, The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1, 10.1348/000709908X380772
Wegerif, 2007
Wegerif, 2008, Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue, British Educational Research Journal, 34, 347, 10.1080/01411920701532228
Wegerif, 2004
Wegerif, 1998, Software design to support discussion in the primary curriculum, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 199, 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.143057.x
Wellington, 2005, Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004, Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 25, 10.1080/02635140500068419
Wood, 1976, Role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yoon, 2005, Teacher understandings of technology affordances and their impact on the design of engaging learning experiences, Educational Media International, 42, 297, 10.1080/09523980500237716