In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard

Computers & Education - Tập 55 - Trang 350-362 - 2010
Paul Warwick1, Neil Mercer1, Ruth Kershner1, Judith Kleine Staarman2
1University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 8PQ, UK
2University of Exeter, Graduate School of Education, St. Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander, 2008 Armstrong, 2005, Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology, Educational Review, 57, 457, 10.1080/00131910500279551 Arvaja, 2009, Collaborative learning and computer-supported collaborative learning environments Baines, 2007, Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment, British Educational Research Journal, 33, 663, 10.1080/01411920701582231 Baines, 2009, Improving pupil group work interaction and dialogue in primary classrooms: Results from a year-long intervention study, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 95, 10.1080/03057640802701960 Barnes, 2008, Exploratory talk for learning, 1 Barron, 2003, When smart groups fail, The Journal of Learning Science, 12, 307, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 Blatchford, 2003, Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8 Bruner, 1986 Cazdan, 2001 Cogill, J. (2003). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching? <http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_Interactive_whiteboards_in_the_primary_school.pdf> Retrieved 04.05.09. Dawes, 2004, Talk and learning in classroom science, International Journal of Science Education, 26, 677, 10.1080/0950069032000097424 Dawes, 2008 Dawes, 2008, Encouraging students’ contributions to dialogue during science, School Science Review, 90, 1 DCSF (2008). The Assessment for Learning Strategy. <http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publications&ProductId=DCSF-00341-2008> Retrieved 07.04.09. DfES, 2004 Edwards, 1990 Esarte-Sarries, 2003, Scratching the surface: A typology of Interactive Teaching Galton, 1999, Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976–96, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 23, 10.1080/0141192990250103 Glover, 2005, The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 155, 10.1080/14759390500200199 Gott, 1995 Hennessy, 2006, Integrating technology into the teaching and learning of school science: A situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research, Studies in Science Education, 42, 1, 10.1080/03057260608560219 Hennessy, 2009, Intermediate theory’ building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies, Teachers College Record, 111, 1753, 10.1177/016146810911100701 Hennessy, 2007, Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 283, 10.1080/17439880701511131 Higgins, 2007, Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 213, 10.1080/17439880701511040 Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H., et al. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: Final report by the University of Newcastle for the Department of Education and Skills. <http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/univ_newcastle_evaluation_whiteboards.pdf> Retrieved 07.04.09 Howe, 2003, Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 51, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00073-9 Howe, 2007, Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning, Learning and Instruction, 17, 549, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004 Jewitt, 2007, Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teacher design of texts for interactive white boards in the secondary school classroom, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 303, 10.1080/17439880701511149 John, 2005, Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT, Educational Review, 57, 405, 10.1080/00131910500278256 Kennewell, 2007, The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning, Learning Media and Technology, 32, 227, 10.1080/17439880701511073 Kress, 2001 Kutnick, 2008, Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity, Learning and Instruction, 18, 83, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.12.002 Laurillard, 2004, Re-thinking the teaching of Science Leach, 2004, Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing on the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning Linn, 2000, WISE science, Educational Leadership, 58, 29 Looi, 2010, Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness, Computers and Education, 54, 14, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.003 Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7 Mercer, 2000 Mercer, 2005, Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137, 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137 Mercer, 2004, Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science, British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359, 10.1080/01411920410001689689 2008 Mercer, 2007 Mercer, 2006, Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems, Language and Education, 20, 507, 10.2167/le678.0 Mercer, 1999, Is ‘exploratory talk’ productive talk? Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levačić, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. DfES Research Paper 816, London. Noffke, 2005, Action research, 89 Nordkvelle, 2005, Visions for ICT, ethics and the practice of teachers, Education and Information Technologies, 10, 21, 10.1007/s10639-005-6745-6 Osbourne, 2002, EPSE project 3: Teaching pupils ‘ideas-about-science’, School Science Review, 84, 29 Piaget, 1969 Reznitskaya, 2009, Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 29, 10.1080/03057640802701952 Rogoff, 1995, Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, 139 Rojas-Drummond, 2003, Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2 Rojas-Drummond, 2003, Talking for reasoning among Mexican primary school children, Learning and Instruction, 13, 653, 10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00003-3 Rudd, T. (2007). Interactive whiteboards in the classroom. Bristol: Futurelab Report: IWBs 2007. Skidmore, 2006, Pedagogy and dialogue, Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 503, 10.1080/03057640601048407 Smith, 2006, Impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher–pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies, British Educational Research Journal, 32, 443, 10.1080/01411920600635452 Somekh, 2007 Tharp, 1988 Vygotsky, 1962 Wall, 2005, ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 851, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00508.x Warwick, 2008, Primary teachers’ understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children’s collaborative learning and knowledge-building, Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 269, 10.1080/17439880802496935 Warwick, 2006, Using data comparison and interpretation to develop procedural understandings in the primary classroom: Case study evidence from action research, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 443, 10.1080/09500690500277896 Webb, 2009, The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1, 10.1348/000709908X380772 Wegerif, 2007 Wegerif, 2008, Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue, British Educational Research Journal, 34, 347, 10.1080/01411920701532228 Wegerif, 2004 Wegerif, 1998, Software design to support discussion in the primary curriculum, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 199, 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.143057.x Wellington, 2005, Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004, Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 25, 10.1080/02635140500068419 Wood, 1976, Role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x Yoon, 2005, Teacher understandings of technology affordances and their impact on the design of engaging learning experiences, Educational Media International, 42, 297, 10.1080/09523980500237716