A methodology for the selection of knowledge management (KM) tools
ITI 2002. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (IEEE Cat. No.02EX534) - Trang 369-374 vol.1
Tóm tắt
As a result of the increasing popularity of knowledge management numerous knowledge management tools have appeared on the software market. Therefore, selecting a tool that suitably meets their requirements is difficult and confusing for many organisations. Consequently a methodology is designed that describes the issues and factors that should be taken into consideration during the selection of a knowledge management tool.
Từ khóa
#Knowledge management #Design methodology #Software tools #Isolation technology #Management information systems #Humans #Organizational aspects #Information technology #GuidelinesTài liệu tham khảo
10.1108/13673279910275611
10.1111/1468-2419.00130
sharland, 1991, Package Evaluation A Practical Guide to Selecting Applications and Systems Software
stewart, 2000, Software preserves knowledge, people pass it on, Fortune, 142, 390
patel, 2000, The design of a framework for knowledge management tool evaluation, Proceedings of First European Conference on Knowledge Management Bled Slovenia, 223230
ruggles, 1997, Knowledge Tools Using Technology to Manage Knowledge Better
curry, 1983, How to Find and Buy Good Software A Guide for Business and Professional People
angus, 1998, Knowledge management: Great concept...but what is it?, InformationWeek, 58
10.1111/1467-6486.00269
10.1109/52.136163
10.1108/03074809910290486
jackson, 1999, Process to Product Creating Tools for Knowledge Management
duffy, 2001, The tools and technologies needed for knowledge management, Information & Management, 35, 64
davenport, 1998, Working Knowledge How Organisations Manage What They Know
mcdonald, 1996, Evaluating primary health care software packages, ITCH '96 (A Conference Addressing Information Technology Issues in Community Health) Victoria Conference Centre Victoria Canada
martin, 1983, Buying software off the rack, Harvard Business Review, 61, 32