A methodology for the selection of knowledge management (KM) tools

N. Patel1, V. Hlupic1
1Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex

Tóm tắt

As a result of the increasing popularity of knowledge management numerous knowledge management tools have appeared on the software market. Therefore, selecting a tool that suitably meets their requirements is difficult and confusing for many organisations. Consequently a methodology is designed that describes the issues and factors that should be taken into consideration during the selection of a knowledge management tool.

Từ khóa

#Knowledge management #Design methodology #Software tools #Isolation technology #Management information systems #Humans #Organizational aspects #Information technology #Guidelines

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1108/13673279910275611 10.1111/1468-2419.00130 sharland, 1991, Package Evaluation A Practical Guide to Selecting Applications and Systems Software stewart, 2000, Software preserves knowledge, people pass it on, Fortune, 142, 390 patel, 2000, The design of a framework for knowledge management tool evaluation, Proceedings of First European Conference on Knowledge Management Bled Slovenia, 223230 ruggles, 1997, Knowledge Tools Using Technology to Manage Knowledge Better curry, 1983, How to Find and Buy Good Software A Guide for Business and Professional People angus, 1998, Knowledge management: Great concept...but what is it?, InformationWeek, 58 10.1111/1467-6486.00269 10.1109/52.136163 10.1108/03074809910290486 jackson, 1999, Process to Product Creating Tools for Knowledge Management duffy, 2001, The tools and technologies needed for knowledge management, Information & Management, 35, 64 davenport, 1998, Working Knowledge How Organisations Manage What They Know mcdonald, 1996, Evaluating primary health care software packages, ITCH '96 (A Conference Addressing Information Technology Issues in Community Health) Victoria Conference Centre Victoria Canada martin, 1983, Buying software off the rack, Harvard Business Review, 61, 32