Adverse rotorcraft pilot couplings—Past, present and future challenges

Progress in Aerospace Sciences - Tập 62 - Trang 1-51 - 2013
Marilena D. Pavel1, Michael Jump2, Binh Dang-Vu3, Pierangelo Masarati4, Massimo Gennaretti5, Achim Ionita6, Larisa Zaichik7, Hafid Smaili8, Giuseppe Quaranta4, Deniz Yilmaz1, Michael Jones2, Jacopo Serafini5, Jacek Malecki9
1Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS, Delft, The Netherlands
2Univ. of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, L69 3GH Liverpool, United Kingdom
3ONERA, Base Aerienne 701, FR-13661 Salon de Provence, France
4Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, I-20156 Milano, Italy
5Università Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 79, I-00146 Roma, Italy
6STRAERO, B-dul Iuliu Maniu 220, Bucharest, Romania
7NLR, Anthony Fokkerweg 2, NL-1059 CM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
8PZL-Swidnik, Al. Lotnikow Polskich 1, 21045 Swidnik, Poland
9TsAGI, Zhukovsky str., 140180 Zhukovsky, Russian Federation

Tài liệu tham khảo

Padfield, 2005, The birth of flight control: an engineering analysis of the Wright Brothers’ 1902 glider, The Aeronautical Journal, 107, 697, 10.1017/S0001924000013464 McRuer DT, Droste, 1997 Reichert, 1981, Helicopter vibration control—a survey, Vertica, 5, 1 Hansford Robert E, Vorwald John. Dynamic workshop on rotor vibratory loads. In: Proceedings of the 52nd forum of the American Helicopter Society. Washington, DC; June 4–6, 1996. Kufeld Robert M, Bousman William G. High load conditions measured on a UH-60A in manoeuvring flight. In: Proceedings of the 51st Forum of the American Helicopter Society. Texas; May 9–11, 1995. Datta Anubhav, Chopra Inderjit. Validation and understanding of UH-60A vibration loads in steady flight. In: Proceedings of the 58th American Helicopter Society conference. Montreal, Canada; 11–14 June 2002. Loewy Robert G. Helicopter vibrations: a technological perspective. Alexander A. Nikolsky lecture. In: 40th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Arlington, VA; May 1984. Borshchevskiy, 1958, The effect of vibrations of certain types of modern helicopters and airplanes, Voyenno Meditsinslciy Zhurnal, Military Medical Journal Hornick Richard J.Vibration. In: Bioastronautics data book. NASA SP-3006; 1973 [Chapter 7]. Mitchell DG, Klyde DH. Identifying a PIO signature—new techniques applied to an old problem. In: AIAA 2006–6495 presented at the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit. Keystone, Colorado; 21–24 August 2006. Ionita, 2012, Triggering event—a key factor in adverse aircraft–rotorcraft pilot couplings, INCAS Bulletin, 4, 3, 10.13111/2066-8201.2012.4.3.1 Yamauchi GK, Young A. A status of NASA rotorcraft research, NASA TP-2009-215369, September 2009. Strehlow Henning. GARTEUR Helicopter Exploratory Group EG-22 Pilot activated oscillations—rotorcraft pilot coupling. GARTEUR EG report. April 2004 Tischler, 1990, System identification requirements for high-bandwidth rotorcraft flight control system design, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 13, 835, 10.2514/3.25409 Tischler, 1991, Flying quality analysis and flight evaluation of a highly augmented combat rotorcraft, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, 954, 10.2514/3.20736 Anon. Aeronautical design standard ADS33E-PRF, performance specification, handling qualities requirements for military rotorcraft. US Army AMCOM. Redstone, Alabama; March 21, 2000. Pavel MD, Dang Vu B, Goetz J, Jump M, Dieterich O, Haverdings H. Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: Prediction and suppression of rigid body RPC. In: Proceedings of the 34th European rotorcraft forum. Liverpool, UK; 2008. Pavel MD, et al. Present and future trends in rotorcraft pilot couplings (RPCs)—a retrospective survey of recent research activities within the European Project ARISTOTEL. In: Proceedings of the 36th European rotorcraft forum. Gallarate, Italy; 13–14 September 2011. Pavel MD, et al. A retrospective survey of adverse rotorcraft pilot couplings in European perspective. In: Proceedings of the AHS 68th annual forum and technology display. Fort Worth, Texas, USA; 1–3 May 2012. GARTEUR FM-AG12. Evaluation of prominent PIO susceptibility criteria. GARTEUR/TP-120-01. October 1999. GARTEUR FM AG-12. PIO handbook. GARTEUR/TP-120-10. January 2002. GARTEUR FM AG-12. Analysis of non-linear pilot-vehicle systems using modern control theory, TP-120-02. 2000. GARTEUR FM-AG12. Investigation of methods for on-line PIO detection, TP-120-09. 2002. GARTEUR FM-AG13. GARTEUR handbook of mental workload measurement. GARTEUR TP 145. July 2003. GARTEUR FM-AG15. Pilot-in-the-loop oscillations analysis and test techniques for their prevention—phase II. Workshop, Saab AB, Sweden; May 10, 2007. GARTEUR FM-AG12. A state-space approach for stability analysis of a combat aircraft in presence of rate limits involving pilot induced oscillations. TP-120-11, September 2002. Dieterich O, Götz J, DangVu B, Haverdings H, Masarati P, Pavel M, et al. Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: recent research activities in Europe. In: Proceedings of the 34th European rotorcraft, forum. Liverpool, UK; 16–19 September 2008. Serafini J, Gennaretti M, Masarati P, Quaranta G, Dieterich O. Aeroelastic and biodynamic modelling for stability analysis of rotorcraft-pilot coupling phenomena. In: Proceedings of the 34th European rotorcraft forum. Liverpool, UK; 2008. Jump M, Hodge S, Dang B, Vu P, Masarati G, Quaranta M, et al. Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: the construction of the test campaigns at the University of Liverpool. In: Proceedings of the 34th European rotorcraft forum. Liverpool, UK; 2008 AGARD. AGARD flight mechanics panel on handling qualities of unstable highly augmented aircraft. AGARD AR-279; May 1991. AGARD. AGARD flight mechanics panel on active control technology: applications and lessons learned. AGARD CP-560; January 1995. AGARD. AGARD FVP workshop pilot induced oscillations. AGARD-AR-335; February 1995. AGARD. Flight control design – best practices. RTO-TR-029; December 2000. McRuer DT. Pilot-induced oscillations and human dynamic behaviour. NASA CR-4683; 1995. Shafe M, Steinmetz P. Pilot induced oscillations: status at the end of the century. NASA/CD-2001-210389/VOL 1–3. Edwards, California: NASA Dryden FRC; 2001. Ali SF, A low cost simulation system to demonstrate pilot induced oscillation phenomenon. NAG2-4006. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center; March 31, 1995. Anon. MIL-STD-1797A. Department of Defense Interface Standard, Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft. MIL-STD-1797A, January 1990; Notice of Change, 28 June 1995. Padfield, 2007 Hamel Peter G. Rotorcraft-pilot coupling—a critical issue for highly augmented helicopters? In: AGARD-FVP Symposium on advances in rotorcraft technology. Ottawa, Canada; AGARD-CP-592. Paper no. 21, 27–30 May 1996. McRuer, 1967, A review of quasi-linear pilot models, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, 231, 10.1109/THFE.1967.234304 Gibson, 1999 McRuer, 1992 Smith Ralph. Observations on PIO. AGARD-AR 335 1995. Transport Safety Board of Canada. A 319 encounter with wake turbulence. Aviation investigation report A08W007. 10 January 2000. EASA A08W007. Hess, 2003 Kulberg E, Elgerona Per-Olof. SAAB experience with PIO. AGARD AR-335. Cooper GE, Harper RP Jr. The use of pilot ratings in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. NASA TM D-5133; 1969. Hodgkinson, John, Aircraft handling qualities, Blackwell Science, 1999 Padfield, 1998, The making of helicopter flying qualities; a requirements perspective, The Aeronautical Journal of RaeS, 102, 409, 10.1017/S0001924000027627 Mitchell, 2004, Evolution, revolution and challenges of handling qualities, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 27, 12, 10.2514/1.3252 Padfield Gareth D. Rotorcraft handling qualities engineering, managing the tension between safety and performance. In: Proceedings of the 68th American Helicopter Society Annual forum, Alexander Nikolsky lecture. Forth Worth, Texas; May 1–3, 2012. Hess, 1997, Unified theory for aircraft handling qualities and adverse aircraft pilot coupling, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 20, 1141, 10.2514/2.4169 Höhne G. Roll ratcheting—cause and analysis [PhD dissertation]. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft und Raumfahrt. Forschungsberichte; 2001. Höhne G. A biomechanical pilot model for prediction of roll racketing. In: Proceedings of the AIAA conference on guidance, navigation and control, AIAA paper 1999-4092, 1999. p. 187–96. Klyde DH, Mitchell DG. A PIO case study—lessons learned through analysis. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit. San Francisco; August 15–18, 2005. Norton WJ. Aeroelastic pilot-in-the-loop oscillations. Presented at AGARD flight vehicle pannel workshop on pilot induced oscillations. AGARD-AR-335; February 1995. Klyde DH, McRuer DT, Myers TT. Unified pilot-induced oscillation theory, vol. I: PIO analysis with linear and nonlinear effective vehicle characteristics, including rate limiting. Flight Dynamics Directorate Wright Laboratory, Air Force Base Ohio, WL-TR-96-3028, December 1995. Smith GW, Montgomery T. Biomechanically induced and controller coupled oscillations experienced on F-16XL aircraft during roll maneuvres, NASA TM-4752. Washington; 1996. Prouty RW, Helicopter aerodynamics, ray prouty's rotor and wing columns 1979–1992. Phillips Business Information; 2004. Lawrence Ben, Padfield Gareth D. A handling qualities analysis of the Wright brothers 1902 glider. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference. Austin, Texas; 11–14 August 2003 McRuer Duane. PIO—a historical perspective. AGARD-AR-335. In: Flight vehicle integration panel workshop on pilot induced oscillations. February 1995. Connor RD. Wrecked rotors: understanding rotorcraft accidents, 1935–1945. In: Proceedings of the 66th Annual forum and technology display of the American Helicopter Society. Phoenix, Arizona; May 11–13, 2010. Hohenemser Kurt H. Hingeless rotorcraft flight dynamics. AGARD-AG-197. 1974. Ockier Carl J. Pilot Induced oscillations in helicopters—three case studies. DLR report Institutsbericht IB 111-96/12. Bouwer, 2004, vol. 147, 617 Tischler MB, Fletcher JW, End Morri PM. Application of flight control system methods to an advanced combat rotorcraft. In: Paper presented at the Royal Aeronautical Society conference on helicopter handling qualities and control. London (UK); November 1988. Walden R Barry. A retrospective survey of pilot-structural coupling instabilities in naval rotorcraft. In: Proceedings of the 63rd annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Virginia Beach, VA; May 1–3, 2007. Miller DG, White F. A treatment of the impact of rotor-fuselage coupling on helicopter handling qualities. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 43rd annual forum. St. Louis, MO; May 1987. Lantzsch Robin, Jens Wolfram, Hamers Mario. Increasing handling qualities and flight control performance using an air resonance controller. In: Proceedings of the 64th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Montreal, Canada; April 29–May 1, 2008. Dryfoos James, Mayo John, Kothmann Bruce. An approach to reducing rotor-body coupled roll oscillations on the RAH-66 Comanche using modified roll rate feedback. In: Proceedings of the 55th AHS forum proceedings. Montreal, Canada; May 1999. Pavel MD, Padfield GD. Understanding the peculiarities of rotorcraft–pilot couplings. In: Proceedings of the 64th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Montreal; May 2008. Pavel Marilena D. Modelling lead–lag dynamics for rotorcraft-pilot-couplings investigation. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 66th annual forum & technology display. Phoenix Arizona; May 11–13, 2010. Glusman SI, Landis KH, Dabundo C. Handling qualities evaluation of the ADOCS primary flight control system. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 42nd annual forum. June 1986. Bilger, 1982, Results of structural dynamic testing of the XV-15 tilt rotor research aircraft, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 27, 10.4050/JAHS.27.58 Felker, 1987, Nonlinear behavior of an elastomeric lag damper undergoing dual-frequency motion and its effect on rotor dynamics, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 34, 10.4050/JAHS.32.45 Alansky I, Faull R, Skonieczny J. Handling qualities of the SH-60B SEAHAWK®. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 37th annual forum. New Orleans, LA; May 1981. Kaplita Thaddeus T,Driscoll, Joseph T, Diftler, Myron A, Hong Steven W. Helicopter simulation development by correlation with frequency sweep flight test data. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 45th annual forum. Boston, MA; May 1989. Brack RA. The arrival of the tiltrotor. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 61st annual forum. Grapevine, TX; June 2005. Mayo JR. The involuntary participation of a human pilot in a helicopter collective control loop. In: Proceedings of the 15th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; September 1989. Parham TJ, Popelka D, Miller DG, Frobel AT. V-22 pilot-in-the-loop aeroelastic stability analysis. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 47th annual forum. Phoenix, AZ; May 1991. Dabundo C, White J, Joglekar M. Flying Qualities evaluation of the V22 tiltrotor. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 47th annual forum. Phoenix, AZ; May 1991. Curtiss HC, Jr. Rotorcraft stability and control: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Alexander A. Nikolsky lecture, American Helicopter Society international 56th annual forum. Virginia Beach, VA; May 2–4, 2000. Kuczynsky, 1980, The influence of engine/fuel control design on helicopter dynamics and handling qualities, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 25, 26, 10.4050/JAHS.25.26 Fu KH, Kaletka J. Frequency domain identification of Bo-105 derivative models with rotor degrees of freedom. In: Proceedings of the16th European rotorcraft forum. Glasgow, England; September 1990, paper no III.10.3. Heffley RK, Bourne S, Curtiss HC, Hindson WS, Hess RA. Study of helicopter roll control effectiveness. NASA contractor report, 177404. 1986. Dryfoos JB, Kothmann BD. An approach to reducing rotor-body coupled roll oscillations on the RAH-66 Comanche using modified roll rate feedback. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 55th annual national forum proceedings. Montreal, Canada; May 1999. p. 1127–40. Hendrick Russell, Ramohalli Gautham, Yanke David, Fortenbaugh Robert, Freeman Thomas. Advanced flight control development for single-pilot attack helicopters. In: Proceedings of the 42nd annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Washington, DC; June 1986. Ellis, 1953, Effects of articulated rotor dynamics on helicopter automatic control system requirements, Aeronautical Engineering Review, 12 Curtiss, 1988, Stability and Control Modelling, V m/M, 12, 381 Landis Kenneth H, Glusman Steven I. Development of ADOCS controllers and control laws. vol. I, executive summary; vol. 2, literature review and preliminary analysis; vol. 3, simulation results and recommendations. (D210-12323-I, -2, -3, Boeing Vertol Company; NASA contract NAS2-I0880.) USAAVSCOM TR84-A-7, also NASA CR-177339. 1985. Tischler, 1989, Assessment of digital flight-control technology for advanced combat rotorcraft, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 34, 66, 10.4050/JAHS.34.66 Tischler MB. Digital control of highly augmented combat rotorcraft, NASA TM-88346. May 1987. Chen, 1986, Influence of high-order dynamics on helicopter flight-control system bandwidth, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 9, 190, 10.2514/3.20089 Hoh RH, Heffley RK, Mitchell DG. Development of handling qualities criteria for rotorcraft with externally slung loads, NASA-CR-2006, 213488. October 2006. Masarati P, Quaranta G, Gennaretti M, Serafini J. An investigation of aeroelastic rotorcraft–pilot interaction, European rotorcraft forum. Gallarete, VA, Italy; September 13–15, 2011. Paper no. 112. Serafini J, Molica Colella M, Gennaretti M. A finite-state aeroelastic model for rotorcraft pilot assisted oscillations analysis. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 4–7 September 2012. Prouty RW. Helicopter performance, stability and control, PWS engineering. 1986. Young, 1964, A theory of rotor blade motion stability in powered flight, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 9, 12, 10.4050/JAHS.9.12 Smith RH. A theory for longitudinal short-period pilot induced oscillations, AFFDL TR-77-57. June 1977. McRuer DT, Krendel ES. Mathematical models of human pilot behaviour, AGARD AG-118. January 1974. Tustin, 1947, The nature of the human operator's response in manual control and its implications for controlled design, Journal of IEE, 94, 190 Gerlach, 1977 Duda, 1997, Prediction of pilot in the loop oscillations due to rate saturation, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 20, 581, 10.2514/2.4080 McRuer DT, Krendel ES. The human operator as a servo system element, Journal of Franklin Institute 1959; 267(5):381 [and No. 6. p. 511, June 1959]. Elkind, 1964, A survey of the development of models for the human controller McRuer, 1967, A review of quasi-linear pilot models, IEEE Transactions, HFE-8, 231 Mariano Valeria, Guglieri G, Ragazzi A. Application of pilot induced oscillations prediction to rotorcraft. In: Proceedings of the 37th European rotorcraft forum, Gallarate, September 13–15, 2011. Muscarello V, Masarati P Quaranta G. Multibody analysis of rotorcraft pilot coupling. In: Proceedings of the second joint international conference on multibody system dynamics—IMSD 2012. Stuttgart, Germany; May 29–June 1, 2012. Hess Ronald A. Modelling biodynamic interference in helicopter piloting tasks. In: Proceedings of the AHS aeromechanics specialists’ conference. San Francisco, CA; January 20–22, 2010. Smith R. A unifying theory for pilot opinion rating. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on manual control. No. NASA TM X-73, NASA; May 1976. pp. 542–58. Hosman, 1996 Innocenti M. The optimal control pilot model and application. AGARD lecture series no. 157 advances in flying qualities, No. AGARD-LS-157. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation; 1988. Goto N, Chatani K, Fujita S. H-infinity-model of the human pilot controlling unstable aarcraft. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vancouver 1; 1995 Lone Mohammad, Cook Alastair K. Review of pilot modelling techniques. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition. Orlando, Florida; 4–7 January 2010. AIAA 2010-297. Cardullo F, Zaychik K, George G. A conspectus on operator modelling: past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the AIAA modelling and simulation conference and exhibit, No. AIAA-2006-6625, AIAA. Keystone, Colorado; August 2006. Hess, 1987, Feedback Control models—manual control and tracking, 1250 Mitchell DG. Identifying the pilot in pilot induced oscillations. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, AIAA-2000-3985. Denver; 14–17 August 2000. Bjorkman, EA, Bennett, RL, Eidsaune, DW, Miyamoto, S., Wilkinson, OC. NT-33 pilot induced oscillations prediction evaluation. USAFTPS-TR-85B-S4, June 1986. Mitchell DG, Stadler BK. Simulation investigation of category I and II PIO. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, AIAA-99-403. Portland; August 1999. Nieuwenhuizen F, Beykirch KA, Mulder M, Bülthoff HH. Identification of pilot control behaviour in a roll-lateral helicopter hover task. In: Proceedings of the AIAA modelling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit, Hilton Head (SC), No. AIAA-2007-6799, August 2007. Zaal MT, Sweet BT. Estimation of time-varying pilot model parameters. In: Proceedings of the AIAA modelling and simulation technologies conference. Portland, Oregon; 8–11 August 2011. Zaal PMT. Pilot control behavior discrepancies between real and simulated flight caused by limited motion stimuli [PhD thesis]. Delft University of Technology, 2011. Zaal, 2009, Identification of multimodal pilot control behaviour in real flight, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 33, 1418, 10.2514/1.44648 Pool Daan M, Objective evaluation of flight simulator motion cuing fidelity through a cybernetic approach [PhD thesis]. Delft University of Technology, 2012. Klyde DH, Schulze PC, Thompson PM, Liang CL. Use of wavelet scalograms to characterize rotorcraft pilot–vehicle system interactions. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 66th annual forum. Phoenix, 11–13 May, 2010. Hess RA. A preliminary study of human pilot dynamics in the control of time-varying systems. In: Proceedings of the AIAA 2011-6554, AIAA modelling and simulation technologies conference. Portland, Oregon; 8–11 August 2011. Yilmaz D, Pavel MD, Jones M, Jump M, Lu L. Identification of pilot control behavior during possible rotorcraft pilot coupling events. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; September 4–7, 2012. Venrooij J, Yilmaz D, Pavel MD, Quaranta G, Jump M, Mulder M. Measuring biodynamic feedthrough in helicopters. In: Proceedings of the 37th European rotorcraft forum. 13–15 September 2011. Venrooij J, Pavel MD. A practical biodynamic feedthrough model for helicopters. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 4–7 September 2012. Masarati P, Quaranta G, Gennaretti, M, Serafini J. Aeroservoelastic analysis of rotorcraft pilot coupling: a parametric study. In: Proceedings of the AHS 2010 American Helicopter Society 66th annual forum. Phoenix, AR, USA; September 2010. Masarati, 2013, Experimental and numerical helicopter pilot characterization for aeroelastic rotorcraft pilot couplings analysis, Proceedings of the IMechE, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 227, 124, 10.1177/0954410011427662 Quaranta G, Masarati P, Venrooij J. Robust stability analysis: a tool to assess the impact of biodynamic feedthrough on rotorcraft. In: Proceedings of the AHS 2012 American Helicopter Society 68th annual forum. Forth Worth, TX, USA; May 2012. Gibson JC, Hess RA. Stick and Feel System Design. AGARD-332. March 1997 Parham T, Jr., Corso LM. Aeroelastic and aeroservoelastic stability of the BA 609. In: Proceedings of the 25th European rotorcraft forum. Rome, Italy; September 14–16, 1999. Jex HR. Problems in modelling man-machine control behavior in biodynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual conference on manual control. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA June 2–4, 1971. p. 3–13. Allen RW, Jex HR, Magdaleno RE. Manual control performance and dynamic response during sinusoidal vibration, AMRL-TR 73-78. October 1973. Idan M, Merhavt SJ. Effects of biodynamic coupling on the human operator model, AIAA 89-3518. Levison WE, Harrah CB. Biomechanical and performance response of man in six different directional axis vibration environments, AM&TR77-71. September 1977. Levison WH. Model for human controller performance in vibration environments, aviation, space and environmental medicine, January 1978. p. 321–7. Jex HR, Magdaleno RE. Biomechanical models for vibration feed-through of hands and head for semisupine pilot, aviation, space and environmental medicine. January 1978. p. 304–16. Riedel SA, Magdaleno RE, Jex HR. User's guide to BIODYN-80: an interactive simulation package for modelling biodynamic feedthrough to a pilot's hands, head and eyes, system technology Inc. Technical report no. 1146-1. December 1980 Gabel, 1968, Test approaches to external sling load instabilities, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 13, 44, 10.4050/JAHS.13.44 Allen MG. AFTI/F-16 pilot coupled roll oscillation. In: Proceedings of the AIAA 83-2282-CP, AIAA guidance and control conference. Gatlinburg, Tennessee; August 1983. Kaplita TT, Driscoll JT, Diftler MA, Hong SW. Helicopter simulation development by correlation with frequency sweep flight test data. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 45th annual forum. Boston, MA; May 1989. Johnston DE, Magdaleno RE, Independent assessment of the C/MH-53E technical evaluation program. Technical report no. 1251-1R, Systems Technology, Inc.; September 1990. Ingle SJ, Weber TL, Miller DG. Concurrent Handling qualities and aeroservoelastic specification compliance for the RAH-66 comanche. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Aeromechanical specialist conference. San Francisco, California; January 1994. Gray WR. Boundary avoidance tracking: a new pilot tracking model. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit. San Francisco; AIAA 2005-5810. 2005. Gray WP. A boundary avoidance tracking flight test technique for performance and workload assessment. In: Proceedings of the 38th symposium of society of experimental test pilots. San Diego; 2007. Gray WR. A generalised handling qualities flight test technique utilizing boundary avoidance tracking. US Air Force T&E Days, Los Angeles; AIAA 2008-1648. 2008. Warren, RD, An investigation of the Effects of Boundary Avoidance on Pilot Tracking, Thesis Depart of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology, AFIT/GAE/ENY/06-S11, 2006 Magdaleno Raymond E, McRuer Duane T, George P Moore. Small perturbation dynamics of the neuromuscular system in tracking tasks. NASA CR-1212. 1968. TR-154-1. Magdaleno Raymond E, Duane T McRuer. Experimental validation and analytical elaboration for models of the pilot's neuromuscular subsystem in tracking tasks, NASA CR-1757. 1971. Venrooij J, Abbink DA, Mulder M, van Paassen MM, Mulder M. Biodynamic feedthrough is task dependent. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems man and cybernetics (SMC). Istanbul, Turkey; October 10–13 2010. p. 2571–8. Zanoni A, Masarati P, Quaranta G. Rotorcraft pilot impedance from biomechanical model based on inverse dynamics. Presented at IMECE 2012. Houston, Texas; November 9–15, 2012. Masarati P., Quaranta G. Coupled bioaeroservoelastic rotorcraft-pilot simulation, In: ASME 9th multibody system and nonlinear dynamics conference, Portland, OR, USA; August 4–7, 2013. DETC2013-12035. Dotter JD: An analysis of aircraft handling quality data obtained from boundary avoidance tracking flight test techniques [Thesis]. Department of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology, AFIT/GAE/ENY/07-M24, 2007. Blake RD. Boundary avoidance tracking: consequences (and uses) of imposed boundaries on pilot-aircraft performance [Thesis]. Department of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology. 2009. Niewind, 2011, Investigations on boundary avoidance tracking and pilot inceptor workload, CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2, 147, 10.1007/s13272-011-0037-1 de Groot S, Pavel M. 2006. New insights into pilot behaviour during hazardous rotorcraft pilot induced oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 62nd American Helicopter Society annual forum. May 9–11, 2006. Brinkerink Nico, Pavel Marilena D. Capturing the switch between point tracking and boundary avoiding pilot behaviour in a PIO event. In: Proceedings of the rotorcraft handling qualities conference, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; November 4–6, 2008. Jump, 2006, Investigation of the flare manoeuvre using optical tau, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 29, 1189, 10.2514/1.20012 Padfield, 2012, Optical tau in boundary-avoidance tracking—a new perspective on pilot-induced oscillations, AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 35, 80, 10.2514/1.54065 Lee, 1998, Guiding movement by coupling taus, Ecological Psychology, 10, 221, 10.1207/s15326969eco103&4_4 Lee, 1999, Sensory and intrinsic coordination of movement, Proceedings of Biological Sciences, 266, 2029, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0882 Lee DN. Tau in action in development, action as an organizer of learning and development. In: Rieser JJ, Lockman JJ, Nelson CA, editors, Proceedings of the 33rd volume in the Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Minnesota; 2005. p. 3–50. Padfield, 2003, How do helicopter pilots know when to stop, turn or pull up?, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 48, 108, 10.4050/JAHS.48.108 Padfield, 2007, How long do pilots look forward? prospective visual guidance in terrain-hugging flight, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 52, 134, 10.4050/JAHS.52.134 van der Weerd, 2000 Rodchenko, 2003, Handling qualities criterion for roll control of highly augmented aircraft, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 26, 928, 10.2514/2.6920 Hoh RE, Hodgkinson J. Bandwidth—a criterion for highly augmented airplanes. AGARD CP-333. April 1982. Smith RE. Effects of control system dynamics on fighter approach and landing longitudinal flying qualities, AFFDL-TR-87-122. Buffalo; 1978. Bjorkman EA. Flight test evaluation of techniques to predict longitudinal pilot-induced oscillations, AFIT-GAE-AA-86J-1. Wright Patterson AFB; 1986. Lindsey SW. Prediction of longitudinal pilot-induced oscillation using the optimal control model, AFIT-GAE-ENY/90M-1. Wright Patterson AFB; 1989. Mitchell D, Hoh R, Aponso B, Klyde D. Proposed incorporation of mission-oriented flying qualities into MIL STD-1797A. WL-TR-95-3049. Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio; 1994. Dang-Vu B, Pavel MD, Yilmaz D, Lu L, Jones M, Jump M. Report demonstrating the results of the helicopter rigid-body model validation exercise, ARISTOTEL ACPO-GA-2010-266073, Deliverable 4.9. December 2012. Mitchell DG, Klyde DH. A critical examination of PIO prediction criteria. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, Boston, MA; August 1998 Mitchell DG, Hoh RH, Aponso BL, Klyde DH. The measurement and prediction of pilot-in-the-loop oscillations. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference proceedings, Scottsdale, AZ; August 1994 Smith RH. A theory for longitudinal short-period pilot-induced oscillations. AFFDL-TR-77-57. Dayton; 1977. Smith RH, Geddes ND. Handling quality requirements for advanced aircraft design: longitudinal mode. AFFDL-TR-78-154. Dayton; 1978. Smith RH. The Smith-Geddes Handling Qualities Criteria. 1994 SAE Aerospace Atlantic Conference. Dayton; 1994. Neal, 1971, a flying qualities criterion for the design of fighter flight control systems, Journal of Aircraft, 8, 803, 10.2514/3.59174 Bailey RE, Bidlack TJ. A quantitative criterion for pilot-induced oscillations: time domain Neal-Smith criterion. AIAA-96-3434-CP. Duda H. Effects of rate limiting elements in flight control systems—a new PIO-criterion. In: Proceedings of the AIAA-95-3204, AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference. Baltimore, MD; 7–10 August 1995. Duda, 1997, Prediction of pilot-in-the-loop oscillations due to rate saturation, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 20, 581, 10.2514/2.4080 Duda, 1998, Flight control system design considering rate saturation, Elsevier Science Ltd., Aerospace Science and Technology, 4, 265, 10.1016/S1270-9638(98)80004-7 Ossmann D, Heller M, Brieger O. Enhancement of the nonlinear OLOP-PIO-criterion regarding phase-compensated rate limiters. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit. Honolulu, Hawaii; 18–21 August 2008. AIAA 2008-6207. Mehra RK, Kessel WC, Carrol JV. Global stability and control analysis of aircraft at high angle of attack. Scientific Systems Inc.; AD-AO 51850-SSI-TR-77-1. 1977. Mehra RK, Prasanth RK. Bifurcation and limit cycle analysis of non-linear pilot. AIAA paper 98-4249. 1998. Halanay A., Ionita A., Safta C.A.., Hopf bifurcations through delay in pilot reaction in a longitudinal flight, Nonlinear Dynamics, 60, 413-423, 2010 Guicheteau, Ph. Application of the bifurcation theory to the study of combat aircraft departure. AGARD CP-319. Paper no. 17, 1981. Zagaynov GI, Goman MG. Bifurcation analysis of critical aircraft flight regimes. ICAS-80-4.2.1. 1984. Planeaux JB, Beck JA, Baumann DD. Bifurcation analysis of a model fighter aircraft with control augmentation. AIAA paper 90-2836. 1990. Lowenberg, 1991 Fan, 1991, Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36, 25, 10.1109/9.62265 G. Ferreres, 2003, Robustness analysis of flexible structures: practical algorithms, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 13, 715, 10.1002/rnc.742 Doyle, 1982, Analysis of Feedback systems with structured uncertainties, IEE Proceedings, 129, 25 Ferreres, 1998, Nonlinear analysis in the presence of parametric uncertainties, International Journal of Control, 69, 695, 10.1080/002071798222631 Tierno, 1997, Describing function analysis in the presence of uncertainty, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 20, 25, 10.2514/2.4140 Megretski, 1997, System analysis via integral quadratic constraints, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 819, 10.1109/9.587335 Rantzer Anders, Megretski Alexandre. System analysis via integral quadratic constraints, part II. Technical report ISSN 0280-5316, Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden; September 1997. Graham, 1961 Cavallo, 1992, Robust flight control systems: a parameter space design, AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 15, 1207, 10.2514/3.20970 Ioos, 1981 Marsden, 1976 Bailey RE, Smith RE. Suppression filters during the fighter approach and landing task. NASA CR-163116. March 1982. Powers B. Space shuttle pilot-induced-oscillations research testing. AGARD 262. 1984. Mitchell DG. PIO detection with a real-time oscillation verifier (ROVER). In: Viewgraphs presented at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, April 8, 1999. NASA/CP-2001-210389/vol. 2. Mitchell DG, Klyde DH. Recommended practices for exposing pilot-induced oscillations or tendencies in the development process. AIAA 2004-6810, California, November 2004. Mitchell DG, Hoh RH. Development of methods and devices to predict and prevent pilot-induced oscillations, AFRL-VA-WP-TR-2000-3046. December 2000. Mitchell DG, Arencibia AJ, Munoz S. Real-time detection of pilot-induced oscillations. In: Proceedings of the AIAA-04-4700 atmospheric flight mechanics conference, Providence, RI; 16–19 August 2004. Suliman Shafiek MT, Yilmaz Deniz, Pavel Marilena D. Harmonizing real-time oscillation verifier (ROVER) with handling qualities assessment for enhanced rotorcraft pilot couplings detection. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; September 2012. Jones, 2012, A new method for near real-time rotorcraft pilot coupling detection and identification, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 35, 80 Jones DA. Suppression of pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). Ohio: Air Force Institute of Technology; March 2002. Jones M, Jump M, Lu L, Yilmaz D, Pavel MD. Using the phase-aggression criterion to identify rotorcraft pilot coupling events. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. ERF, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; September 2012. Jones M, Jump M. Prediction of rotorcraft pilot-induced oscillations using the phase-aggression criterion. In: Proceedings of the 69th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society. Phoenix, Arizona; 2013. Stephane Mallat A. Wavelet tour of signal processing: The sparse way, 3rd edition, Kindle Edition, 2008. Daubechies, 1992 Jones JG, Watson GH. Multiresolution analysis using adaptive wavelets. In: Szu HH, editor. Wavelet applications. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 2242. Orlando, FL, USA; 1994. p. 119–29. Watson, 1993, Positive wavelet representation of fractal signals and images, 117 Foster, 1989, Analysis of atmospheric turbulence measurements by spectral and discrete-gust methods, Aeronautical Journal, 93, 162, 10.1017/S000192400001695X Klyde DH, Schulze PC, Thompson PM, Liang CY. Use of wavelet scalograms to characterize rotorcraft pilot–vehicle system interactions. In: Proceedings of the 66th American Helicopter Society. Phoenix, AZ; May 11, 2010. Lu Linghai, Jump Michael, Jones Michael. Tau coupling investigation using positive wavelet analysis. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; September 2012 Muscarello V, Masarati P, Quaranta G. Robust aeroservoelastic analysis for the investigation of rotorcraft pilot couplings. Presented at CEAS 2011. Venice, Italy; 24–28 October 2011. Quaranta G, Tamer A, Muscarello V, Masarati P, Gennaretti M, Serafini J, et al. Evaluation of rotary wing aeroelastic stability using robust analysis. In: Proceedings of the 38th ERF. Amsterdam, NL; September 4–7, 2012. Ferguson Samuel W; Clement, Warren F; Cleveland, WB; and Key, David L, Assessment of simulation fidelity using measurements of piloting technique in flight. In: 40th annual meeting of the American Helicopter Society. Arlington, VA; 1984. p. 67–92. Kullberg E, Elgcrona P. SAAB experience with PIO. Flight vehicle integration panel workshop on pilot induced oscillations. Report no. AGARD-AR-335, paper no. 9. 1995. Kullberg Bjorn. HQDT, a method for predicting handling qualities in high performance aircraft. Defence Material Administration Testing Directorate; 1995. Jones M, Jump M. Generic research simulator requirements for prediction of adverse rotorcraft pilot couplings in heave axis. In: Proceedings of the AHS 68th annual forum and technology display. Fort Worth, Texas, USA; 1–3 May 2012. Von Grunhagen Wolfgang, Thorben Schonenberg, Lantzsch Robin, Lusardi Jeff A, Lee David, Fischer Heiko. Handling qualities studies into the interaction between active sidestick parameters and helicopter response types. In: Proceedings of the 38th European rotorcraft forum. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; September 2012. Jex HR. Problems in modelling man–machine control behavior in biodynamic environments. NASA CP-281. 1971. p. 3–13. Aponso, BL, Johnston, DE, Johnson, WA, Magdaleno, RE. Identification of higher-order helicopter dynamics using linear modelling methods. In: Proceedings of the 47th annual forum. AHS, Phoenix; May 6–8, 1991. p. 137–53. Johnson Donald E, Magdaleno Raymond E. Independent assessment of C/MH-53E technical evaluation program (TEP). Systems Technology, Inc.; TR-1251-1 R, September 1990. Buchacker E. Experience with SIFT flight-test-techniques at the German Air Force Flight Test Center “AGARD-CP-333. Paper 24. June 1982. Blanken, 1994, Investigation of the effects of bandwidth and time delay on helicopter roll-axis handling qualities, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 39, 24, 10.4050/JAHS.39.24 Cameron Neil, Padfield Gareth D. Handling qualities degradation in tilt-rotor aircraft following flight control system failures. In: Proceedings of the 30th European rotorcraft forum. Marseilles; September 14–16, 2004. Tischler Mark B, Ivler Christina M, Hossein Mansur M, Cheung Kenny K, Berger Tom. Berrios Marcos. Handling-qualities optimization and trade-offs in rotorcraft flight control design. In: Proceedings of the RAeS rotorcraft handling-qualities conference, University of Liverpool, UK; 4–6 November 2008. Kessler, Ch. Active rotor control for helicopters: motivation and survey on higher harmonic control. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 2011;1:3-22. Kessler, Ch. Active rotor control for helicopters: individual blade control and swashplateless rotor designs. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 2011;1:23-54. Pew, 2008, More than 50 years of history and accomplishments in human performance model development, Journal of Human Factors, 50, 489, 10.1518/001872008X288493 Karem AE. Optimum speed rotor. Patent application publication. US 2001/0001033 A1. 2001. ACARE. European Aeronautics: a vision for 2020. Report group of personalities. January 2001. Little ME. Longbow Apache Flight control system development and flight test. In: Paper presented at the American Helicopter Society 52nd annual forum. Washington, DC; June 4–6, 1996. Anon. Attack reconnaissance helicopter operations. FM 3-04.126 Headquarters, Department of the U.S. Army, Washington; February 2007. Sections 33–44. Shimanski, Charley. Accidents in mountain rescue operations. Mountain Rescue Association; 2008. Christensen K, Koelzer H, Hollifield P, Wiggins L, Olmstead M. A method to determine maximum flight control authority through hardover failure testing. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 65th annual forum. Texas, US; May 2009. Anon. Flightpath 2050 Europe's vision for aviation. Report of the High level group on aviation research, European Union; 2011. Antifora A, Toulmay F. Clean sky—the Green rotorcraft integrated technology demonstrator—state of play three years after kick-off. In: Proceedings of the 37th European rotorcraft forum. Milano, Italy; September 13–15, 2011. Paper no. 206. McGuire DP. Fluidelastic dampers and isolators for vibration control in helicopters. In: Proceedings of the 50th annual forum of American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC; May 11–13, 1994. Hoh RH. Dynamic requirements in the new handling qualities specification for us military rotorcraft, from helicopter handling qualities and flight control RAS . In: Proceedings of the international conference. London; 1988. Olson John R Scott Mark W. Helicopter design for maneuverability and agility. In: Proceedings of the 45th annual forum of American Helicopter Society. Boston, MA; May 22–24, 1989. Hoh Roger H, Smith James C, Hinton David A. The effects of display and autopilot functions on pilot workload for single pilot instrument flight rule (SPIFR) operations. NASA CR-4073. June 1987. Taylor Robert M, Brown Lex, Dickson Blair. From safety net to augmented cognition: using flexible autonomy levels for on-line cognitive assistance and automation. In: Paper presented at the RTO HFM symposium on “spatial disorientation in military vehicles: causes, consequences and cures”. La Coruña, Spain; 15–17 April 2002 [published in RTO-MP-086].