What are digital media?

Discourse, Context and Media - Tập 41 - Trang 100502 - 2021
John A. Bateman1
1Faculty of Linguistics and Literary Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adami, 2015, A Social Semiotic Perspective on Digital Mobility, Media Education, 6, 184 Adlington, 2019, The Multimodal Blog: Co-Authored Texts in the Primary and Middle Years Classroom, 128 Anstey, 2018 2015 Aufderheide, 1993 Barthes, 1977 Bateman, 2008 Bateman, 2016, Methodological and theoretical issues for the empirical investigation of multimodality Bateman, 2017, Triangulating transmediality: a multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres, Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 160, 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.009 Bateman, John A.. 2021. Dimensions of Materiality: Towards an External Language of Description for Empirical Multimodality Research. In: Pflaeging, Jana, Wildfeuer, Janina, Bateman, John A. (Eds.), Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 35–64. Bateman, 2017, Multimodality – Foundations Bawden, 2001, Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts, Journal of Documentation, 57, 218, 10.1108/EUM0000000007083 Berry, 2011 Bezemer, 2020, Exploring reading in social semiotics: theory and methods, Education, 3 Bezemer, 2016 Bogost, 2005, Procedural Literacy: Problem Solving with Programming, Systems & Play. Telemedia, 52, 32 Bolter, 1999 Bordwell, 2007 Borgo, 2010, Ontological Foundations of DOLCE, 279 Bucher, Hans-Jürgen. 2011. Multimodales Verstehen oder Rezeption als Interaktion. Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen einer systematischen Analyse der Multimodalität. In Hans-Joachim Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.), Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele, 123–156. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. Bucher, Hans-Jürgen. 2019. Politische Meinungsbildung in sozialen Medien? Interaktionsstrukturen in der Twitter-Kommunikation. In Konstanze Marx & Axel Schmidt (eds.), Interaktion und Medien. Interaktionsanalytische Zugänge zu medienvermittelter Kommunikation (OraLingua 16), 287–318. Heidelberg: Winter. Bucher, 2011, The relevance of attention for selecting new content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print- and online media, Communications. The European Journal of Communications Research, 31, 347 Buckingham, David. 2010. Defining Digital Literacy. What Young People Need to Know About Digital Literacy. In Ben Bachmair (ed.), Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen: Die deutschsprachige und britische Diskussion, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Burn, 2014, The kineikonic mode: towards a multimodal approach to moving-image media, 375 Carmi, 2020, Rhythmedia: A Study of Facebook Immune System, Theory, Culture & Society, 37, 119, 10.1177/0263276420917466 Carmi, Elinor, Simeon J. Yates, Eleanor Lockley & Alicja Pawluczuk. 2020. Data citizenship: rethinking data literacy in the age of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation. Internet Policy Review: Journal on internet regulation 9(2). Online. 2021 Christie, 1997 Cloonan, 2011, Creating multimodal metalanguage with teachers, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10, 23 Cope, 1997, Multiliteracies, education and the new communications environment: A response to Vaughan Prain, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 469 Cope, 2000, Designs for social futures, chap. 10, 203 Cope, 2009, Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164, 10.1080/15544800903076044 Couldry, Nick & Andreas Hepp. 2017. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity. Dondis, 1972 Eisenlauer, 2014, Facebook as a third author—(semi-)automated participation framework in social network sites, Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 73, 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006 Eisenlauer, 2020, The EFL-YouTube remix: Empowering multimodal and computational literacies for EFL purposes, Journal of Visual Literacy, 10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826220 Elleström, 2014 Eseht-Alkalai, 2004, Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93 Flewitt, 2006, Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: Education research assumptions and methodological practices, Visual Communication, 5, 25, 10.1177/1470357206060917 Gee, 1996 Goodman, 1969 Hattwig, Denise, Kaila Bussert, Ann Medaille & Joanna Burgess. 2013. Visual Literacy Standards in Higher Education: New Opportunities for Libraries and Student Learning. portal: Libraries and the Academy 13(1). 61–89. Haugeland, John. 1991. Representational Genera. In William M. Ramsay ad Stephen P. Stich & David E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, 61–90. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hayles, 2004, Print is Flat, Code is Deep: The Importance of Media-Specific Analysis, Poetics Today, 25, 67, 10.1215/03335372-25-1-67 Herring, Susan C. 2013. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2011, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Ingold, 1993, Technology, language, intelligence: A reconsideration of basic concepts, 449 Jenkins, 2008 Jensen, 2010 Jewitt, 2002, The move from page to screen: the multimodal reshaping of school English, Visual Communication, 1, 171, 10.1177/147035720200100203 Jewitt, 2008, Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms, Review of Research in Education, 32, 241, 10.3102/0091732X07310586 Jewitt, 2017, A Multimodal Perspective on Touch, Communication, and Learning, 106 Jewitt, Carey. 2017b. Multimodal discourses across the curriculum. In Steven L. Thorne & Stephan May (eds.), Language, Education and Technology, vol. 9 Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 31–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing 3rd edn. Jewitt, 2003 Johannessen, 2019, Accelerating semogensis: an ecosocial approach to photography, Visual Communication Jones, 2012 Kay, 1977, Personal dynamic media, Computer, 10, 31, 10.1109/C-M.1977.217672 Kellner, 2005, Towards Critical Media Literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 369 Kress, 1997 Kress, 2003 Kress, 2014, What is mode?, 60 Kress, 2000 Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. [1990, 1996] 2006. Reading Images: the grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge. First published with Deakin University Press (Geelong, Victoria, Australia) in 1990 in the series Sociocultural aspects of language and education. Lankshear, 2007, Sampling ”the New” in New Literacies, 1 Licklider, 1968, 21 Lim, 2018, Developing a systemic functional approach to teach multimodal literacy, Functional Linguistics, 5 Lim, 2017, Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts, 175 Lim, 2018, Developing Multimodal Literacy Through Teaching the Critical Viewing of Films in Singapore, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62, 291, 10.1002/jaal.882 Livingston, 2004, Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies, The Communication Review, 7, 3, 10.1080/10714420490280152 Manovich, 2001 Manovich, 2013 Masterman, 1985 Mateas, 2005, Procedural Literacy: Educating the New Media Practitioner, On The Horizon, 13, 101, 10.1108/10748120510608133 Mills, 2010, A Review of the ”Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies, Review of Educational Research, 80, 246, 10.3102/0034654310364401 Mills, Kathy Ann & Len Unsworth. 2017. Multimodal literacy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford University Press. URL http://education.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-232. Monaco, 2009 Moschini, 2018, Social semiotics and platform studies: an integrated perspective for the study of social media platforms, Social Semiotics, 28, 623, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504714 Murray, 1997 Nake, 1994, Human-computer interaction: signs and signals interfacing, Languages of Design, 2, 193 Nake, 2001, Human-computer interaction viewed as pseudo-communication, Knowl.-Based Syst., 14, 441, 10.1016/S0950-7051(01)00140-X New London Group, 1996, A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60, 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u Pangrazio, 2019, ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data, New Media & Society, 21, 419, 10.1177/1461444818799523 Papacharissi, 2015 Petroni, 2011 Poulsen, 2018, Studying social media as semiotic technology: a social semiotic multimodal framework, Social Semiotics, 28, 700, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1505689 Prince, 2007 Reinhardt, 2019, Digital Literacies as Emergent Multifarious Repertoires, 208 Schmidt, 2019, Multimodality as a challenge: Youtube data in linguistic corpora Semali, 2003, Writing with Visual Languages: Making the Case for Critical Media Literacy, The Clearing House, 76, 271, 10.1080/00098650309602018 Sindoni, 2013, Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach, vol. 7 Sindoni, 2014, Through the looking glass: a social semiotic and linguistic perspective on the study of video chats, Text & Talk, 34, 325, 10.1515/text-2014-0006 Sindoni, Maria Grazia, Elisabetta Adami, Styliani Karatza, Ivana Marenzi, Ilaria Moschini, Sandra Petroni & Marc Rocca. 2019. The Common Framework of Reference for Intercultural Digital Literacies. Tech. Rep. 2016–1-IT02-KA203-024087 EU-MADE4LL EU Project. http://www.eumade4ll.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/cfridil-framework-linked-fin1.pdf. Sless, 1981 Stjernfelt, 2000, Diagrams as Centerpiece of a Peircean Epistemology, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 36, 357 Street, 2014, Multimodality and New Literacy Studies, 227 1993 Street, 2005, At Last: Recent Applications of New Literacy Studies in Educational Contexts, Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 417 Unsworth, 2006, Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5, 55 Unsworth, 2014, Towards a metalanguage for multimedia narrative interpretation and authoring pedagogy, 1 van Leeuwen, 2020, The new visuality of writing, 64 van Leeuwen, 2013, David Byrne really does love Powerpoint: art as research on semiotics and semiotic technology, Social Semiotics, 23, 409, 10.1080/10350330.2012.738998 Vee, 2017 Walsh, 2011 Wellman, 2004, The three ages of internet studies: ten, five and zero years ago, New Media & Society, 6, 123, 10.1177/1461444804040633 Zhao, 2014, Semiotic technology and practice: a multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint, Text & Talk, 34, 349, 10.1515/text-2014-0005