Performance of two clinical decision rules for knee radiography

The Journal of Emergency Medicine - Tập 15 - Trang 459-463 - 1997
Peter B. Richman1, Charles F. McCuskey1, Ashraf Nashed2, Susanna Fuchs3, Richard Petrik1, Michael Imperato1, Judd E. Hollander1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, U.S.A.
2Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, U.S.A.
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Stiell, 1993, Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: Refinement and prospective validation, JAMA, 269, 1127, 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127 Stiell, 1995, Use of radiography in acute knee injuries: Need for clinical decision rules, Acad Emerg Med, 2, 966, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03123.x Stiell, 1995, Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries, Ann Emerg Med, 26, 405, 10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70106-0 Bauer, 1995, A clinical decision rule in the evaluation of acute knee injuries, J Emerg Med, 13, 611, 10.1016/0736-4679(95)00064-H Anis, 1995, Cost effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules, Ann Emerg Med, 26, 422, 10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70108-7 Stiell, 1996, Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries, JAMA, 275, 611, 10.1001/jama.1996.03530320035031 Stiell, 1996, The “real” Ottawa ankle rules [letter to the editor], Ann Emerg Med, 27, 103, 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70309-8